生态与农村环境学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (9): 1098-1103.doi: 10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2021.0153

• 《生物多样性公约》缔约方大会第15次会议(COP15)专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

履行《名古屋议定书》背景下病原体共享的规则、挑战与对策

张小勇   

  1. 中国社会科学院大学法学院, 北京 102488
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-15 出版日期:2021-09-25 发布日期:2021-09-18
  • 作者简介:张小勇(1974-),男,甘肃平凉人,教授,博士,主要研究方向为遗传资源法律制度。E-mail:zhang.xy@cass.org.cn
  • 基金资助:
    生态环境部生物多样性调查、观测和评估项目(2018-2019)

Rules, Challenges and Countermeasures of Sharing of Pathogens in the Context of the Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol

ZHANG Xiao-yong   

  1. School of Law, University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 102488, China
  • Received:2021-03-15 Online:2021-09-25 Published:2021-09-18

摘要: 及时共享病原体对于尽早识别病原体、开展风险评估、启动循证干预措施以及开发诊断工具、疫苗和药品至关重要。《名古屋议定书》的谈判过程显示,病原体在其范围之内。《名古屋议定书》的序言段落明确提及了病原体,不仅如此,其关于获取和惠益分享的一般规则以及特殊考虑的规则适用于病原体。随着《名古屋议定书》进入履约阶段,病原体共享面临着不同方面的挑战。履行《名古屋议定书》造成了某些病原体共享延迟或受限的后果。《名古屋议定书》与世界卫生组织《共享流感病毒以及获取疫苗和其他惠益的大流行性流感防范框架》的关系至今未获得明确界定。技术的发展使得数字序列信息有取代有形材料的趋势,而《名古屋议定书》在规制数字序列信息的利用上存在严重漏洞。为了应对这些挑战,缔约方不仅要在国内层面上引入特殊的措施、程序和安排,而且要在集体协商决策的基础上推出切实有效的对策。通过这些努力,未来病原体共享将会在公共卫生防范和应对过程中发挥更加有力的作用。

关键词: 《名古屋议定书》, 获取和惠益分享, 病原体共享, 数字序列信息

Abstract: Timely sharing of pathogens is critical for pathogens early identification, risk assessment, evidence-based interventions initiation, and subsequent development of diagnostic tools, vaccines and medicines. The negotiating history of the Nagoya Protocol indicates that the pathogens falls within the scope of the Nagoya Protocol. The preamble of the Nagoya Protocol explicitly refers to pathogens, and not only that, but its general rules on access and benefit-sharing as well as special considerations also apply to pathogens. The issue of pathogen sharing faces different aspects of challenges as the Nagoya Protocol requires states' compliance. Since the Nagoya Protocol takes the bilateral approach to the access and benefit-sharing, the implementation of the Nagoya Protocol has resulted in the delay or limit of sharing of certain pathogens, such as for seasonal influenza virus. The relationship between the Nagoya Protocol and the Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework for the Sharing of Influenza Viruses and Access to Vaccines and other Benefits has not yet been clearly defined, thereby producing legal uncertainty surrounding the sharing of influenza viruses with human pandemic potential. The tendency that the use of digital sequence information presumably substitutes the physical materials has emerged as a result of technology developments, but the Nagoya Protocol leaves a major gap in regulating the use of digital sequence information, especially for the sharing of benefits arising from the use of digital sequence information. The Contracting Parties should introduce special measures, procedures and arrangements at the domestic level, such as fast-track procedure for access to pathogens. At the same time, the Contracting Parties should put forward effective countermeasures based on collective consultative decision-making in order to respond to the challenges. In the future, the sharing of pathogen will play stronger role in the public health preparedness and response through the efforts made by the Contracting Parties.

Key words: Nagoya Protocol, access and benefit-sharing, sharing of pathogen, digital sequence information

中图分类号: