生态与农村环境学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (11): 1430-1440.doi: 10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2023.0441

• 区域环境与发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

资源禀赋、家乡认同与农户村域环境治理参与方式选择

李雨柯1,2, 罗小锋1,2, 唐林1,3   

  1. 1. 华中农业大学经济管理学院/湖北农村发展研究中心, 湖北 武汉 430070;
    2. 湖北生态文明建设研究院, 湖北 武汉 430070;
    3. 武汉工程大学法商学院, 湖北 武汉 430205
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-17 发布日期:2023-11-21
  • 通讯作者: 罗小锋,E-mail:luoxiaofeng@mail.hzau.edu.cn E-mail:luoxiaofeng@mail.hzau.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:李雨柯(1997-),女,安徽阜阳人,博士生,研究方向为农业资源与环境经济。E-mail:lyk@webmail.hzau.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(72073048);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2662022JGYJ001)

Resource Endowment, Hometown Identity and Farmers' Choice of Participation Methods in Village Environmental Governance

LI Yu-ke1,2, LUO Xiao-feng1,2, TANG Lin1,3   

  1. 1. College of Economics & Management, Huazhong Agricultural University/Hubei Rural Development Research Center, Wuhan 430070, China;
    2. Institute of Hubei Ecological Civilization Construction, Wuhan 430070, China;
    3. Law and Business School, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, China
  • Received:2023-05-17 Published:2023-11-21

摘要: 明晰农村居民环境治理参与方式的选择偏好,对进一步提高农户环境治理参与率,加快生态宜居和美丽乡村建设具有重要意义。基于湖北省1 168份微观调研数据,采用双变量Probit模型实证方法分析资源禀赋、家乡认同与农户村域环境治理参与方式选择之间的内在作用关系。结果表明:(1)农户村域环境治理参与方式选择存在差异,10.70%的农户倾向于仅出钱参与村域环境治理,38.36%的农户倾向于仅出力参与,19.52%的农户倾向于既出钱又出力参与。(2)受教育水平、务工收入占比越高的农户越偏好于出钱参与村域环境治理;家庭总收入、务工收入占比越低,社会网络越宽泛的农户越偏好于出力参与;家庭总收入、社会信任和社会声望水平越高的农户,越偏好于又出钱又出力的方式参与。(3)家乡认同在家庭总收入影响农户"是否愿意出钱"和劳动力数量影响农户"是否愿意出力"参与村域环境治理过程中存在正向调节作用,即家乡认同在一定程度上能够推动有能力出钱或出力参与却未参与村域环境治理的农户群体参与。对此,从提高农户家庭资源禀赋水平、培育和加强农户家乡认同感、加快农村经济发展以及制定群体差异化治理策略等方面提出推动农户参与环境治理的政策建议。

关键词: 村域环境治理, 资源禀赋, 参与方式, 家乡认同

Abstract: It is important to clarify the preferences of rural residents in their choice of environmental management methods, because it can further increase the participation rate of farmer households in environmental management and to accelerate the construction of ecologically pleasant and beautiful villages. Based on 1 168 microscopic survey data in Hubei Province, a bivariate probit model was used to empirically analyse the intrinsic role of the relationship between resource endowment, hometown identity and farmers' choice of participation methods in village environmental governance. The results show that there were differences in farmers' preferences for participation in village environmental governance, with 10.70% of the farmers preferring to participate with money, 38.36% preferring to participate with contributing efforts, and 19.52% preferring to participate with both money and contributing efforts. The higher the level of education and income from work, the more the farmers prefer to participate with money; the lower the proportion of total household income and income from work, and the wider the social network, the more the farmers prefer to participate with contributing efforts; the higher the level of total household income, social trust and social prestige, the more the farmers prefer to participate with both money and contributing efforts. There is a positive moderating effect of hometown identity in the process of total household income influencing farmers' "willingness to pay" and labour force influencing farmers' "willingness to contribute effort" to participate in village environmental management, and hometown identity can promote the participation of the groups of farmers who have the ability to contribute money or efforts to participate but have not yet done so in village environmental governance. Accordingly, policy recommendations are proposed to promote farmers' participation in environmental governance. These include improving their household resource endowment, cultivating and strengthening their sense of hometown identity, accelerating rural economic development and developing group differentiated governance strategies.

Key words: rural environmental governance, resource endowment, participation method, hometown identity

中图分类号: