太湖流域典型地区农村生活污水中污染物在表层土壤中的消减特征与测算

生态与农村环境学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 796-803.doi:

太湖流域典型地区农村生活污水中污染物在表层土壤中的消减特征与测算

万寅婧,王文林,周峰,刘波,唐晓燕,梁斌

江苏省环境工程咨询中心

收稿日期:2013-06-18 修回日期:2013-03-29 出版日期:2013-11-25 发布日期:2013-12-03
通讯作者: 唐晓燕环境保护部南京环境科学研究所 E-mail:cktangxiaoyan@163.com
作者简介:万寅婧（1981-），女，江苏常州人，工程师，硕士，主要从事环境管理研究。E-mail:wanyinjing81@163.com
基金资助:
环保公益性行业科研专项(201309035);国家国际科技合作项目(2010DFB93700);水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2012ZX07506-007);中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项

Characteristics and Estimation of Rural Sewage Pollutants Abatement inby Surface Soil of in Typica Rural Regions Typical ofof the Taihu Lake Basin

WAN Yin-Jing, WANG Wen-Lin, ZHOU Feng, LIU Bo, TANG Xiao-Yan, LIANG Bin

Jiangsu Environmental Engineering Consulting Center

Received:2013-06-18 Revised:2013-03-29 Online:2013-11-25 Published:2013-12-03
Contact: TANG Xiao-Yan Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences,Ministry of Environmental Protection E-mail:cktangxiaoyan@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 原位采集太湖流域典型平原河网地区农户化粪池排口附近的表层土壤及化粪池出水，人工模拟研究区域的典型降雨（夏季30 mm·次^-1，冬季5 mm·次^-1）、气温（夏季27 ℃，冬季5 ℃）条件以及排污负荷[TN：（2.35±0.06） g·m^-2·d^-1，NH₄⁺-N：（2.08±0.04）g·m^-2·d^-1，TP：（0.21±0.01）g·m^-2·d^-1，COD：（11.14±0.59）g·m^-2·d^-1]，并进行室内模拟土柱试验，测算不同季节（夏季和冬季）、不同天气过程（雨前、雨期和雨后）排污口表层土壤对农村生活污水各类污染物的削减率并探讨其削减规律。结果表明：在季节差异上，雨前、雨天和雨后TN削减率均表现为夏季<冬季（P<0.05或P<0.001），NH₄⁺-N削减率则均表现为夏季>冬季（P<0.01）；雨前和雨后TP削减率表现为夏季>冬季（P<0.001），COD削减率无显著季节性差异；雨天TP和COD削减率则均表现为夏季<冬季（P<0.01或 P<0.001）。在天气过程差异上，夏季土壤TN削减率表现为雨后>雨前>雨天（P <0.01），夏季TP和COD削减率表现为雨前≈雨后>雨天（P>0.05，P<0.01），而夏季NH₄⁺-N，冬季TN、NH₄⁺-N、TP和COD削减率在不同天气过程之间无显著差异（P>0.05）。据此划分，夏季雨前、雨天和雨后及冬季削减率分别为38.5%、-25.0%、46.0%和50.4%，夏季和冬季NH₄⁺-N削减率分别为91.5%和85.5%，夏季雨天、夏季其余时间及冬季TP削减率分别为63.3%、93.1%和82.7%，夏季雨天及其余时间COD削减率分别为8.2%和66.2%。

关键词: 太湖流域, 表层土壤, 生活污水, 削减率, 测算

Abstract: Samples of surface soils near the outlets of farmer household septic tanks and samples of the effluents from the tanks were collected in a plain river network region typical of the Taihu Lake Basin for use in an in-laboratory experiment with simulated rainfall (for summer, 30 mm per event and for winter 5 mm per event, typical of the region) controlled temperature (27℃ for summer and 5℃ for winter,typical of the region) and simulated pollutant load [TN: (2.35±0.06) g·m^-2·d^-1, NH₄⁺-N: (2.08±0.04) g·m^-2·d^-1, TP: (0.21±0.01) g·m^-2·d^-1, COD: (11.14±0.59) g·m^-2·d^-1] to estimate pollutants abatement rate in the polluted surface soils and to explore rules of the abatement as affected by seasons (summer and winter) and synoptic process (before the rain, during the rain, after the rain). Results show that TN abatement rates, no matter whether before the rain, in the rain, or after the rain, all showed a tendency of summer < winter (P<0.01), and on the contrary, NH₄⁺-N abatement rates all showed a reverse trend of summer > winter (P<0.01). TP abatement rates showed a tendency of summer > winter (P<0.001) before the rain and after the rain, but COD abatement rates did not differ much between summer and winter. TP and COD abatement rates in the rain both showed a tendency of summer < winter (P<0.01 or P<0.001). As to difference between weather processes, TN abatement rates in summer showed a tendency of after the rain > before the rain> in the rainy days (P<0.01), TP and COD abatement rates in summer showed a tendency of after the rain≈after the rain> in the rainy days (P>0.05, P<0.01), whereas, NH₄⁺-N abatement rates in summer did not differ much between synoptic processes and TN, NH₄⁺-N, TP and COD abatement rates in winter did not either (P>0.05). So, the TN abatement rate before the rain, in the rainy days, after the rain in summer and in winter was 38.5%, -25.0%, 46.0% and 50.4%, respectively. The NH₄⁺-N abatement rate in summer and in winter averaged 91.5% and 85.5%, respectively. The TP abatement rate in the rainy days in summer, in the rest of summer and in winter averaged 63.3%, 93.1% and 82.7%, respectively. The COD abatement rate in the rainy days in summer and in the rest of the year was 8.2% and 66.2%, respectively, on average.

Key words: Taihu Lake basin, surface soil, rural sewage, abatement rate, estimation

中图分类号:

万寅婧, 王文林, 周峰, 刘波, 唐晓燕, 梁斌. 太湖流域典型地区农村生活污水中污染物在表层土壤中的消减特征与测算[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2013, 29(6): 796-803.

WAN Yin-Jing, WANG Wen-Lin, ZHOU Feng, LIU Bo, TANG Xiao-Yan, LIANG Bin. Characteristics and Estimation of Rural Sewage Pollutants Abatement inby Surface Soil of in Typica Rural Regions Typical ofof the Taihu Lake Basin[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2013, 29(6): 796-803.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: http://www.ere.ac.cn/CN/

http://www.ere.ac.cn/CN/Y2013/V29/I6/796

[1]	刘西刚, 王勇辉, 焦黎. 夏尔希里自然保护区草地表层土壤理化性质与海拔高度的关系[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(6): 773-780.
[2]	许涓, 蒋文博, 郭瑞, 张俊, 郑洋. 国外危险废物填埋场退役资金预提留制度研究及其对中国的启示[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(7): 667-672.
[3]	郭利京, 王颖. 我国水稻生产中农药过量施用研究:基于社会和私人利益最大化的视角[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(5): 401-407.
[4]	谢林花, 吴德礼, 张亚雷. 中国农村生活污水处理技术现状分析及评价[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(10): 865-870.
[5]	潘颖, 林杰, 佟光臣, 唐鹏, 张金池, 顾哲衍. 2004-2014年太湖流域植被覆盖时空变化特征[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(1): 37-45.
[6]	邱园园, 张志勇, 张晋华, 张迎颖, 闻学政, 宋伟, 王岩, 刘海琴. 凤眼莲深度净化污水厂尾水生态工程中温室气体的排放特征[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2017, 33(4): 364-371.
[7]	方斌斌, 于洋, 姜伟立, 常闻捷, 杜明勇, 张民. 太湖流域水体和沉积物重金属时空分布特征及潜在生态风险评价[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2017, 33(3): 215-224.
[8]	李新艳, 李恒鹏, 杨桂山, 贺斌, 华梦飞, 王亮, 纪丞, 于诗赟, 庞业, 陈健. 江浙沪地区农村生活污水污染调查[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(6): 923-932.
[9]	彭兆弟, 李胜生, 刘庄, 杨汉培, 李维新, 庄巍, 李文静, 杭小帅. 太湖流域跨界区农业面源污染特征[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(3): 458-465.
[10]	邓绍坡,吴运金,龙涛,林玉锁,祝欣. 我国表层土壤多环芳烃(PAHs)污染状况及来源浅析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2015, 31(6): 866-875.
[11]	徐志荣,叶红玉,卓明,许明珠,武璐. 浙江省农村生活污水处理现状及其对策[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2015, 31(4): 473-477.
[12]	杜新, 施春红, 马方曙. 有机负荷对潮汐流人工湿地净化农村生活污水的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2015, 31(3): 380-384.
[13]	李新艳, 李恒鹏, 杨桂山, 张欢, 陈贝烨. 江苏太湖地区农村生活用水量空间差异及污水去向[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2015, 31(2): 158-165.
[14]	王守全, 袁旭音, 韩磊, 刘斌武, 罗小勇. 湖库滨岸带土地利用对潜水中氮磷削减率的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2015, 31(2): 204-210.
[15]	李静, 闵庆文, 李文华, 焦雯珺, 袁正. 太湖流域平原河网区农业污染研究——以常州市和宜兴市为例[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2014, 30(2): 167-173.