生态与农村环境学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 876-881.doi: 10.11934/j.issn.1673-4831.2015.06.012

• 区域环境与发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

安徽省化肥面源污染环境风险分析

刘钦普   

  1. 南京晓庄学院环境科学学院
  • 收稿日期:2015-03-05 修回日期:2015-08-31 出版日期:2015-11-25 发布日期:2015-11-26
  • 通讯作者: 刘钦普 E-mail:liuqinpu@163.com
  • 作者简介:刘钦普(1957—),男,河南许昌人,教授,博士,主要从事土地资源利用和生态经济方面的研究。E-mail:liuqinpu@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金 (41201151);江苏省生态学重点建设学科项目;南京市环境科学重点建设学科项目

Environmental Risk Analyses of Non-Point Source Pollution From Fertilization in Anhui Province, China.

LIU Qin-pu   

  1. School of Environmental Science, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University
  • Received:2015-03-05 Revised:2015-08-31 Online:2015-11-25 Published:2015-11-26

摘要:

为了深入了解化肥施用对农村生态环境的威胁,在综合考虑化肥施用强度、效率、生态安全标准、环境效应权数及作物复种指数等多种因素的基础上,构建了化肥面源污染环境风险评价指数模型,对安徽省化肥施用时空分异与面源污染环境风险进行研究。结果表明,2013年安徽省总化肥施用强度平均为853.6 kg·hm-2,化肥面源污染环境风险指数为0.72,总环境污染风险程度为中度;氮、磷、钾施用比例平均为1:0.52:0.49,氮、磷和钾3种单质肥料的环境风险指数分别为0.72、0.78和0.65,风险程度分别为中度、高度和低度,其空间分布具有明显的聚集效应。安徽省16个地级市目前普遍存在农田化肥过量施用的问题,区域差异大,分布规律比较明显。其中淮南为严重风险,蚌埠、六安、芜湖和铜陵4个地区为高度风险,其余各市为中度风险。

关键词: 面源污染, 化肥施用强度, 生态安全标准, 环境风险指数, 安徽省

Abstract:

Anhui,being one of the major agricultural provinces in China, is faced with a series of environmental problems, of which nonpoint source pollution from chemical fertilizationin farmlands is one. In order to better understand the potential threats of fertilization to the rural ecosystem and agricultural sustainable development in Anhui Province, China, environmental risk assessment (ERA) of fertilization was conducted. An index model for environmental risk assessment of nonpoint source pollution from fertilization was established and spatio-temporal variation of fertilization and environmental risk of non-point source pollution from fertilization in Anhui was analyzed. Results show that in Anhui of 2013, the total chemical fertilization intensity was 853.6 kg·hm-2 on average; the environmental risk index of the non point source pollution from chemical fertilization was 0.72; the total environmental pollution risk ranked moderate; N:P:K in fertilization was 1:0.52:0.49; the environmental risk index of N, P and K single-element fertilizers was 0.72, 0.78 and 0.65, respectively; the environmental risk of the three kinds of single-element fertilizers ranked moderate, serious and light, respectively; and their spatio-temporal distribution displayed an obvious aggregation effect. In the 16 prefecture-leveled cities, the problem of excessive fertilizationin farmlands existed universally. Though varying sharply from region to region in severity, it displayed a specific pattern of distribution. Environmental risk was very serious in Huainan, serious in Bengbu, Lu′an, Wuhu and Tongling, and moderate in the rest of the cities.

Key words: non-point source pollution, fertilization intensity, ecological safety standard, environmental risk index, Anhui Province