耕地重金属污染治理生态补偿标准条件估值法研究——以广西大环江流域为例

doi:10.11934/j.issn.1673-4831.2016.04.010

生态与农村环境学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 577-581.doi: 10.11934/j.issn.1673-4831.2016.04.010

耕地重金属污染治理生态补偿标准条件估值法研究——以广西大环江流域为例

严俊¹, 张学洪¹, 蒋敏敏¹, 丁洋¹, 陈同斌², 李海翔^1,2

1. 桂林理工大学环境科学与工程学院, 广西桂林541006;
2. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所环境修复研究中心, 北京 100101

收稿日期:2015-11-02 出版日期:2016-07-25 发布日期:2016-07-26
通讯作者: 李海翔 E-mail:lihaixiang0627@163.com E-mail:lihaixiang0627@163.com
作者简介:严俊(1991-),男,广西南宁人,硕士生,研究方向为土壤修复。E-mail:yanjun0428@foxmail.com
基金资助:
广西自然科学基金重大项目（2013GXNSFEA053002）；“八桂学者”建设工程专项；广西研究生教育创新计划（YCSZ2015161）

Study on Eco-Compensation Standard for Remediation of Heavy Metal Polluted Farmland With CVM: A Case Study of the Dahuanjiang River Valley, Guangxi

YAN Jun¹, ZHANG Xue-hong¹, JIANG Min-min¹, DING Yang¹, CHEN Tong-bin², LI Hai-xiang^1,2

1. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China;
2. Center for Environmental Remediation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

Received:2015-11-02 Online:2016-07-25 Published:2016-07-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

运用条件估值法，于2015年8月对广西环江县大环江流域重金属污染地区农户受偿意愿进行调查研究。结果表明，研究区农户对当地耕地重金属污染治理项目的参与意愿与投标额度（设计补偿标准）、家庭耕地面积和耕地受污染程度呈正相关关系；农户平均受偿意愿下限为12630.75元·hm^-2·a^-1，该测算值可为当地耕地重金属污染治理生态补偿标准的确定提供理论依据。认为广西环江县大环江流域耕地重金属污染治理及其配套生态补偿项目应首先选择耕地面积较大且污染较明显地区作为项目选址。建议在今后的生态补偿研究中注意补偿标准与客观条件之间的联系，并制定出一套具有普适性的生态补偿标准研究方法。

关键词: 耕地, 重金属污染, 生态补偿标准, 条件估值法, 大环江流域

Abstract:

A field survey of willingness of farm households to get compensation of heavy metal pollution of farmlands was conducted using the contingent valuation method (CVM) in August 2015 in the Dahuanjiang River Valley in Huanjiang County, Guangxi. Results show that willingness of a farmer house hold to participate in the local soil remediation project is positively related to designed compensation standard, area of the farmland cultivated by the farmer household, and pollution degree of the farmland. On average, farmer households would accept compensation no less than 12630.75 CNY·hm^-2·a^-1, which can serve as a theoretical basis for designing of standards for ecological compensation for remediation of heavy metal polluted farm lands in the valley. It is held that the remediation of heavy metal polluted farmlands and matching eco-compensation projects should begin with regions quite large in area of markedly polluted farmland. It is, therefore, suggested that in future studies on eco-compensation, attention should be paid to the relationship between compensation standards and objective condition and formulation of a universal set of methods for studies on eco-compensation standards.

Key words: farmland, heavy metal pollution, eco-compensation standard, contingent valuation method, Dahuanjiang River Valley

中图分类号:

X196

严俊, 张学洪, 蒋敏敏, 丁洋, 陈同斌, 李海翔. 耕地重金属污染治理生态补偿标准条件估值法研究——以广西大环江流域为例[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(4): 577-581.

YAN Jun, ZHANG Xue-hong, JIANG Min-min, DING Yang, CHEN Tong-bin, LI Hai-xiang. Study on Eco-Compensation Standard for Remediation of Heavy Metal Polluted Farmland With CVM: A Case Study of the Dahuanjiang River Valley, Guangxi[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2016, 32(4): 577-581.

参考文献

[1] 宋伟,陈百明,刘琳.中国耕地土壤重金属污染概况[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(2):294-298.
[2] 环境保护部,国土资源部.全国土壤污染状况调查公报[EB/OL].(2014-04-17)[2015-11-11].http://www.sdpc.gov.cn/fzgggz/ncjj/zhdt/201404/t20140418_607888.html.
[3] 张继舟,王宏韬,倪红伟,等.我国农田土壤重金属污染现状、成因与诊断方法分析[J].土壤与作物,2012,1(4):212-218.
[4] 中国环境保护产业协会重金属防治与土壤修复专业委员会.我国重金属防治与土壤修复行业2013年发展综述[J].中国环保产业,2014(7):4-8.
[5] 蔡银莺,张安录.规划管制下农田生态补偿的研究进展分析[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(5):868-880.
[6] 李碧洁,张松林,侯成成.国内外生态补偿研究进展评述[J].世界农业,2013(2):11-15,21.
[7] 李国平,李潇,萧代基.生态补偿的理论标准与测算方法探讨[J].经济学家,2013(2):42-49.
[8] AMIMEJAD H,KHALILIAN S,ASSAREH M H,et al.Estimating the Existence Value of North Forest of Iran by Using a Contingent Valuation Method[J].Ecological Economics,2006,58(4):665-675.
[9] GVRLVK S.The Estimation of Ecosystem Services' Value in the Region of Misi Rural Development Project:Result From a Contingent Valuation Survey[J].Forest Policy and Economics,2006,9(3):209-218.
[10] 唐成,宋同清,杨钙仁,等.大环江两岸农田重金属污染现状及健康风险评价[J].农业现代化研究,2013,34(5):613-616.
[11] CUMMINGS R G,TAYLOR L O.Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods:A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method[J].The American Economic Review,1999,89(3):649-665.
[12] VENKATACHALAM L.The Contingent Valuation Method:A Review[J].Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2004,24(1):89-124.
[13] BULTE E,GERKING S,LIST J A,et al.The Effect of Varying the Causes of Environmental Problems on Stated WTP Values:Evidence From a Field Study[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2005,49(2):330-342.
[14] CARSON R T.Valuation of Tropical Rainforests:Philosophical and Practical Issues in the Use of Contingent Valuation[J].Ecological Economics,1998,24(1):15-29.
[15] TAO Zhang,YAN Hai-ming,ZHAN Jin-yan.Economic Valuation of Forest Ecosystem Services in Heshui Watershed Using Contingent Valuation Method[J].Procedia Environmental Sciences,2012,13:2445-2450.
[16] HANEMANN W M.Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments With Discrete Responses[J].American Journal of Agricultural Economics,1984,67(3):332-341.
[17] 蔡银莺,张安录.武汉城乡人群对农田生态补偿标准的意愿分析[J].中国环境科学,2011,31(1):170-176.
[18] 汪霞,南忠仁,郭奇,等.干旱区绿洲农田土壤污染生态补偿标准测算:以白银、金昌市郊农业区为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2012,26(12):46-52.

耕地重金属污染治理生态补偿标准条件估值法研究——以广西大环江流域为例

Study on Eco-Compensation Standard for Remediation of Heavy Metal Polluted Farmland With CVM: A Case Study of the Dahuanjiang River Valley, Guangxi

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘军, 张成福, 孙冬杰, 景艳宾. 草原区煤矿开采对周边旱作农田土壤养分和重金属的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(7): 909-916.
[2]	田雪, 周文君, 张正蕊, 李军娟, 高育慧. 不同时间下钝化剂对污染土壤中Cd和Pb的钝化效果[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(4): 522-528.
[3]	刘玉卿, 张华兵. 基于条件估值法(CVM)的湿地周边农户受偿意愿及影响因素研究:以江苏盐城珍禽自然保护区为例[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(11): 982-987.
[4]	吴文晖, 邹辉, 朱岗辉, 廖岳华, 潘海婷, 肖辰畅, 樊娟, 李璐. 湘中某矿区地下水重金属污染特征及健康风险评估[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(11): 1027-1033.
[5]	芮胜阳, 吴娟, 崔娜欣, 李柱, 孔令为, 成水平. 底泥氧化还原环境对苦草（Vallisneria natans）生理生态及重金属元素摄取的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2017, 33(3): 260-264.
[6]	刘俊, 朱允华, 胡劲松, 彭国文, 谢红艳, 李志良, 彭翠英. 湘江中游江段沉积物重金属污染特征及生态风险评价[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2017, 33(2): 135-141.
[7]	陆文勋, 李峥, 孙鹏举, 蔡志毅, 李杨帆, 郭青海. 基于脱钩理论的城市化水平与耕地安全水平的近程耦合关系研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2017, 33(11): 968-974.
[8]	郭连凯, 陈玉福. 平原农区农村聚落合理用地规模测算研究:以山东省禹城市为例[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2017, 33(1): 47-54.
[9]	王丽, 陈凡, 马千里, 姚玲爱, 许振成, 赵学敏, 梁荣昌. 东江惠州段鱼类重金属污染及健康风险评价[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2017, 33(1): 70-76.
[10]	简敏菲, 杨叶萍, 余厚平, 叶嘉敏, 金聪. 德兴铜矿区优势物种苎麻(Boehmeria nivea)对重金属的富集与积累特性[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(3): 486-491.
[11]	卢信, 罗佳, 严少华, 范如芹, 刘丽珠, 张振华. 水葫芦(Eichhornia crassipes)基质中铜残留对蔬菜生长和食用安全的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(3): 492-499.
[12]	童悦,毛传澡,严力蛟. 基于能值-生态足迹改进模型的浙江省耕地可持续利用研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2015, 31(5): 664-670.
[13]	马守臣, 张合兵, 马守田, 李春喜, 邵云. 不同耕作措施对采煤沉陷区坡耕地玉米产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2014, 30(2): 201-205.
[14]	杨晶, 赵云利, 甄泉, 张杰. 某污灌区土壤与蔬菜重金属污染状况及健康风险评价[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2014, 30(2): 234-238.
[15]	刘桂林, 张落成, 张倩. 1985-2010年南京市耕地变化轨迹及驱动力分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2013, 29(6): 688-694.