不同改良剂材料对双季稻田砷污染阻控的影响

doi:10.11934/j.issn.1673-4831.2017.11.011

生态与农村环境学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (11): 1035-1041.doi: 10.11934/j.issn.1673-4831.2017.11.011

不同改良剂材料对双季稻田砷污染阻控的影响

柳开楼^1,2, 胡惠文¹, 周利军¹, 陈燕¹, 余跑兰¹, 叶会财¹, 徐小林¹, 胡志华¹, 黄庆海¹, 李大明¹, 余喜初¹, 谭武贵³

1. 江西省红壤研究所/国家红壤改良工程技术研究中心/农业部江西耕地保育科学观测实验站, 江西南昌 331717;
2. 中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所/农业部植物营养与肥料重点实验室, 北京 100081;
3. 农业部植物营养与生物肥料重点实验室/湖南泰谷生物科技股份有限公司, 湖南长沙 410006

收稿日期:2016-11-25 出版日期:2017-11-25 发布日期:2017-11-24
通讯作者: 黄庆海,E-mail:hqh0791@vip.sina.com E-mail:hqh0791@vip.sina.com
作者简介:柳开楼(1984-),男,河南滑县人,助理研究员,博士生,研究方向为土壤培肥与改良。E-mail:liukailou@126.com
基金资助:
江西省自然科学基金（20151BAB214008）；农业部植物营养与肥料学科群2014年开放基金；国家公益性行业（农业）科研专项（201203030）

Effect of Soil Amendments Controlling Arsenic Contamination in Paddy Field Under Double Rice Cropping Systems

LIU Kai-lou^1,2, HU Hui-wen¹, ZHOU Li-jun¹, CHEN Yan¹, YU Pao-lan¹, YE Hui-cai¹, XU Xiao-lin¹, HU Zhi-hua¹, HUANG Qing-hai¹, LI Da-ming¹, YU Xi-chu¹, TAN Wu-gui³

1. Jiangxi Institute of Red Soil/National Engineering and Technology Research Center for Red Soil Improvement/Scientific Observational and Experimental Station of Arable Land Conservation in Jiangxi, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanchang 331717, China;
2. Ministry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer/Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China;
3. Ministry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Bio-fertilizer/Hunan Taigu Biotechnology Co. Ltd., Changsha 410006, China

Received:2016-11-25 Online:2017-11-25 Published:2017-11-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

探讨比表面积大、孔隙多和吸附性强的生物黑炭和生物源石灰（牡蛎壳粉）配施对酸性水稻土砷（As）污染的阻控效果，从而为该区域土壤的As污染治理提供技术参考。通过盆栽试验，比较不同有机肥（猪粪和生物黑炭）与石灰（矿物源石灰和牡蛎壳粉）配施对As污染水稻土[w（As）为40 mg·kg^-1]的阻控效果，分析了土壤有效As含量，水稻秸秆、籽粒和大米中As含量的变化，并探讨了土壤有效As含量与水稻As吸收的量化关系。结果表明：与CK处理相比，猪粪配施矿物源石灰及牡蛎壳粉条件下土壤w（有效As）降低29.1%~57.0%，生物黑炭配施矿物源石灰及生物石灰条件下土壤w（有效As）下降35.1%~65.9%；而土壤w（有效As）的降低进一步阻控了水稻秸秆、籽粒和大米中As累积。其中，生物黑炭配施牡蛎壳粉处理的效果最好，其秸秆、籽粒和大米中w（As）分别降低67.6%~68.5%、66.6%~67.8%和76.0%~76.9%。进一步分析发现，土壤有效As含量与水稻As吸收量可以用指数方程较好地拟合（R²>0.75，P<0.01）。因此，对于酸性水稻土，生物黑炭和牡蛎壳粉可以通过降低土壤有效As来快速阻控水稻秸秆、籽粒和大米对As的吸收，但当土壤w（有效As）小于30 mg·kg^-1时，施用改良剂降低土壤As含量的效果不明显。

关键词: 水稻土, 土壤As污染, 生物黑炭, 牡蛎壳, 土壤有效As

Abstract:

This paper was designed to explore effects of two soil amendments, biochar (with some pig manure) and ground oyster shell (as biological lime), on arsenic (As) pollution in paddy soil in an attempt to provide some technical reference to the region for controlling As pollution in paddy fields under the double rice cropping system. The two soil amendments are both porous and high in specific surface area and adsorption capacity. To that end, a pot experiment was conducted to compare application of biochar plus mineral lime and ground oyster shell with application of pig manure plus mineral lime and ground oyster shell in effect on As pollution. Soil available As in the pot soils and As contents in rice straw, grain and rice in different treatments were analyzed, and the relationship between soil available As with As absorption of rice quantified. Results show that compared with the soil in CK, the soil in the treatment of pig manure plus mineral lime and ground oyster shell were 29.1%-57.0% lower, and the soils in the treatment of biochar plus mineral lime and ground oyster shell were 35.1%-65.9% lower in content of soil available As. The decrease in soil available As in turn lowered the As accumulation in the crop. The straw, grain and rice in the two treatments was 67.6%-68.5%, 66.6%-67.8% and 76.0%-76.9% lower than their respective one in CK in As content. Meanwhile, it was found that the relationship between soil available As and As absorption of rice could well be fitted with an exponential equation, with R² > 0.75, and P< 0.01. Therefore, in acid paddy fields, it is feasible to reduce soil available As and then As absorption of rice through adding biochar and ground oyster shell, but the effect is not so obvious when soil available As content is lower than 30 mg·kg^-1.

Key words: paddy soil, As pollution in soil, biochar, oyster shell, soil available As

中图分类号:

X53
S156.6

柳开楼, 胡惠文, 周利军, 陈燕, 余跑兰, 叶会财, 徐小林, 胡志华, 黄庆海, 李大明, 余喜初, 谭武贵. 不同改良剂材料对双季稻田砷污染阻控的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2017, 33(11): 1035-1041.

LIU Kai-lou, HU Hui-wen, ZHOU Li-jun, CHEN Yan, YU Pao-lan, YE Hui-cai, XU Xiao-lin, HU Zhi-hua, HUANG Qing-hai, LI Da-ming, YU Xi-chu, TAN Wu-gui. Effect of Soil Amendments Controlling Arsenic Contamination in Paddy Field Under Double Rice Cropping Systems[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2017, 33(11): 1035-1041.

参考文献

[1] 张桃林,潘剑君,刘绍贵,等.集约农业利用下红壤地区土壤肥力与环境质量变化及调控:江西省南昌市郊区和余江县案例研究[J].土壤学报,2007,44(4):584-591.[ZHANG Tao-lin,PAN Jian-jun,LIU Shao-gui,et al.Changes in Soil Fertility and Environmental Quality in Red Soil Region Under Intensive Agricultural Use and Their Control:A Case Study of the Suburbs of Nanchang City and Yujiang County in Jiangxi Province[J].Acta Pedologica Sinica,2007,44(4):584-591.]
[2] 杨长明,杨林章,颜廷梅.不同养分和水分管理模式对土壤生态环境影响[J].农村生态环境,2002,18(3):11-15.[YANG Chang-ming,YANG Lin-zhang,YAN Ting-mei.Effects of Nutrient and Water Regimes on Paddy Soil Eco-Environment[J].Rural Eco-Environment,2002,18(3):11-15.]
[3] 孙华,张桃林,孙波.江西省贵溪市污灌水田重金属污染状况评价研究[J].农业环境保护,2001,20(6):405-407.[SUN Hua,ZHANG Tao-lin,SUN Bo.Assessment of Pollution of Heavy Metals on Paddy Field With Sewage Irrigation in Guixi City,Jiangxi Province[J].Agro-Environmental Protection,2001,20(6):405-407.]
[4] 康立娟,李香丹,刘景华,等.砂壤水稻土添加砷对水稻生长发育和残留的研究[J].吉林农业大学学报,1996,18(3):58-61.[KANG Li-juan,LI Xiang-dan,LIU Jing-hua,et al.Effect of Arsenic on Growth Development of Rice and Residual Rules in the Loam Paddy Soil[J].Journal of Jilin Agricultural University,1996,18(3):58-61.]
[5] 崔晓丹,王玉军,周东美.水分管理对污染土壤中砷锑形态及有效性的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2015,34(9):1665-1673.[CUI Xiao-dan,WANG Yu-jun,ZHOU Dong-mei.Influence of Wetting-Drying and Flooding Water Managements on Forms and Availability of Arsenic and Antimony in Polluted Soils[J].Journal of Agro-Environment Science,2015,34(9):1665-1673.]
[6] 王钊,杨阳,崔江慧,等.外源硅和有机质对水稻土溶液中砷形态变化的影响[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(2):183-188.[WANG Zhao,YANG Yang,CUI Jiang-hui,et al.Effects of Exogenous Silicon and Organic Matter on Arsenic Species in As-Contaminated Paddy Soil Solution During Flooded Period[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,27(2):183-188.]
[7] 李波,青长乐,周正宾,等.肥料中氮磷和有机质对土壤重金属行为的影响及在土壤治污中的应用[J].农业环境保护,2000,19(6):375-377.[LI Bo,QING Chang-le,ZHOU Zheng-bin,et al.Effects of Nitrogen,Phosphorus and Organic Matter on Heavy Metal Behavior in Soils and Its Application of Controlling Pollution[J].Agro-Environmental Protection,2000,19(6):375-377.]
[8] 高宁大,耿丽平,赵全利,等.外源磷或有机质对板蓝根吸收转运砷的影响[J].生态学报,2013,33(9):2719-2727.[GAO Ning-da,GENG Li-ping,ZHAO Quan-li,et al.Effects of Phosphate and Organic Matter Applications on Arsenic Uptake by and Translocation in Isatis indigotica[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2013,33(9):2719-2727.]
[9] BENNETT W W,TEASDALE P R,PANTHER J G,et al.Investigating Arsenic Speciation and Mobilization in Sediments With DGT and DET:A Mesocosm Evaluation of Oxic-Anoxic Transitions[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2012,46(7):3981-3989.
[10] NORTON G J,ADOMAKO E E,DEACON C M,et al.Effect of Organic Matter Amendment,Arsenic Amendment and Water Management Regime on Rice Grain Arsenic Species[J].Environmental Pollution,2013,177:38-47.
[11] 朱雁鸣,冯人伟,韦朝阳.水口山水稻土与菜地土中砷的有效性[J].生态学杂志,2012,31(10):2657-2661.[ZHU Yan-ming,FENG Ren-wei,WEI Chao-yang.Availability of Arsenic in Paddy and Vegetable Soils in Shuikoushan Mining Area of Hunan Province,South-Central China[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,2012,31(10):2657-2661.]
[12] 陈丹艳,许仙菊,栾德琴,等.几种改良剂对砷镉铅复合污染水稻土的修复[J].江苏农业学报,2011,27(6):1284-1288.[CHEN Dan-yan,XU Xian-ju,LUAN De-qin,et al.Remediation of Paddy Soil Contaminated by Arsenic,Cadmium and Lead With Amendments[J].Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2011,27(6):1284-1288.]
[13] 王永,徐仁扣.As(Ⅲ)在可变电荷土壤中的吸附与氧化的初步研究[J].土壤学报,2005,42(4):609-613.[WANG Yong,XU Ren-kou.Adsorption and Oxidation of As(Ⅲ) in Variable Charge Soils[J].Acta Pedologica Sinica,2005,42(4):609-613.]
[14] 田相伟,李元,祖艳群.土壤砷污染及其调控技术研究进展[J].农业环境科学学报,2007,26(增刊1):583-586.[TIAN Xiang-wei,LI Yuan,ZU Yan-qun.Pollution of Arsenic on Soil and Its Remediation Technology[J].Journal of Agro-Environment Science,2007,26(Suppl. 1):583-586.]
[15] 王飞,赵立欣,沈玉君,等.华北地区畜禽粪便有机肥中重金属含量及溯源分析[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(19):202-208.[WANG Fei,ZHAO Li-xin,SHEN Yu-jun,et al.Analysis of Heavy Metal Contents and Source Tracing in Organic Fertilizer From Livestock Manure in North China[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2013,29(19):202-208.]
[16] 柳开楼,李大明,黄庆海,等.红壤稻田长期施用猪粪的生态效益及承载力评估[J].中国农业科学,2013,47(2):303-313.[LIU Kai-lou,LI Da-ming,HUANG Qing-hai,et al.Ecological Benefits and Environmental Carrying Capacities of Red Paddy Field Subjected to Long-Term Pig Manure Amendments[J].China Agricultura Sinica,2014,47(2):303-313.]
[17] 颜钰,王子莹,金洁,等.不同生物质来源和热解温度条件下制备的生物炭对菲的吸附行为[J].农业环境科学学报,2014,33(9):1810-1816.[YAN Yu,WANG Zi-ying,JIN Jie,et al.Phenanthrene Adsorption on Biochars Produced From Different Biomass Materials at Two Temperatures[J].Journal of Agro-Environment Science,2014,33(9):1810-1816.]
[18] 陈玉枝,林舒.牡蛎壳与龙骨成分的分析[J].福建医科大学学报,1999,33(4):432-434.[CHEN Yu-zhi,LIN Shu.Analysis of Components in Os drconis and Oyster Shells[J].Journal of Fujian Medical University,1999,33(4):432-434.]
[19] HUANG Qing-hai,LI Da-ming LIU Kai-lou,et al.Effects of Long-Term Organic Amendments on Soil Organic Carbon in a Paddy Field:A Case Study on Red Soil[J].Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2014,13(3):570-576.
[20] 柳开楼,余跑兰,谭武贵,等.长期施用猪粪对红壤旱地和水稻土肥力和土壤As转化的影响[J].生态环境学报,2015,24(6):1057-1062.[LIU Kai-lou,YU Pao-lan,TAN Wu-gui,et al.Effect of Long-Term Application of Pig Manure on Soil Arsenic Content and Fertility of Red Upland and Paddy Soils[J].Ecology and Environmental Sciences,2015,24(6):1057-1062.]
[21] 解开治,徐培智,严超,等.不同土壤改良剂对南方酸性土壤的改良效果研究[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(20):160-165.[XIE Kai-zhi,XU Pei-zhi,YAN Chao,et al.Study the Effects of Soil Improvement on Acid Soil in the South of China[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2009,25(20):160-165.]
[22] 袁金华,徐仁扣.生物质炭对酸性土壤改良作用的研究进展[J].土壤,2012,44(4):541-547.[YUAN Jin-hua,XU Ren-kou.Research Progress of Amelioration Effects of Biochars on Acid Soils[J].Soils,2012,44(4):541-547.]
[23] 柳开楼,夏桂龙,李亚贞,等.生物黑炭用量对赣东北双季稻生长和产量的影响[J].中国稻米,2015,21(4):91-94.[LIU Kai-lou,XIA Gui-long,LI Ya-zhen,et al.Effects of Different Biochar Fertilizer Rates on Early and Late Rice Growth and Yield in Northeast Area of Jiangxi Province[J].China Rice,2015,21(4):91-94.]
[24] 罗华汉,柳开楼,余跑兰,等.牡蛎壳粉对水稻产量和土壤重金属钝化的影响[J].中国稻米,2016,22(3):30-33.[LUO Hua-han,LIU Kai-lou,YU Pao-lan,et al.Effects of Oyster Shell Powder on Rice Yield and Heavy Metal Stabilization in Paddy Soil[J].China Rice,2016,22(3):30-33.]
[25] 刘莹莹,秦海芝,李恋卿,等.不同作物原料热裂解生物质炭对溶液中Cd²⁺和Pb²⁺的吸附特性[J].生态环境学报,2012,21(1):146-152.[LIU Ying-ying,QIN Hai-zhi,LI Lian-qing,et al.Adsorption of Cd²⁺ and Pb²⁺ in Aqueous Solution by Biochars Produced From the Pyrolysis of Different Crop Feedstock[J].Ecology and Environmental Sciences,2012,21(1):146-152.]
[26] LUO Y,DURENKAMP M,NOBILI M D,et al.Short Term Soil Priming Effects and the Mineralization of Biochar Following Its Incorporation to Soils of Different pH[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2011,43(11):2304-2314.
[27] YU H Y,LI F B,LIU C S,et al.Chapter Five-Iron Redox Cycling Coupled to Transformation and Immobilization of Heavy Metals:Implications for Paddy Rice Safety in the Red Soil of South China[J].Advances in Agronomy,2016,137:279-317.
[28] 钟松雄,尹光彩,陈志良,等.水稻土中砷的环境化学行为及铁对砷形态影响研究进展[J].土壤,2016,48(5):854-862.[ZHONG Song-xiong,YIN Guang-cai,CHEN Zhi-liang,et al.Iron Induced Effects on Arsenic's Environmental Chemical Behavior in Paddy Soil:A Review[J].Soils,2016,48(5):854-862.]
[29] 郑坤,赵全利,耿丽平,等.不同水分条件下外源菌剂对污染水稻土中硅、砷有效性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(3):262-266.[ZHEN Kun,ZHAO Quan-li,GENG Li-ping,et al.Effects of Exogenous Bacterial Inoculants on Silicon and Arsenic Availability in As-Contaminated Paddy Soil Under Different Water Regimes[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,29(3):262-266.]

不同改良剂材料对双季稻田砷污染阻控的影响

Effect of Soil Amendments Controlling Arsenic Contamination in Paddy Field Under Double Rice Cropping Systems

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	何普, 刘鸿雁, 吴龙华, 牟婷婷. 高、低Cd积累水稻和小麦籽粒中Cu、Zn的富集特性[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(3): 385-391.
[2]	袁佳慧, 汪玉, 王慎强, 赵品恒, 王宏燕, 陈浩, 朱文彬. 稻麦轮作磷肥减施下水稻土磷素生物有效性特征[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(7): 599-605.
[3]	韩玮, 孙晨曦, 苏敬. 模拟增温和酸雨对水稻土酶活性及温度敏感性的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2017, 33(12): 1117-1124.
[4]	刘杰云, 邱虎森, 沈健林, 汤宏, 王聪. 不同生物质炭对稻田土壤CH₄排放的影响研究进展[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(4): 525-530.
[5]	曲晶晶, 郑金伟, 郑聚锋, 张旭辉, 李恋卿, 潘根兴, 纪雄辉, 余喜初. 小麦秸秆生物质炭对水稻产量及晚稻氮素利用率的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2012, 28(3): 288-293.
[6]	秦海芝, 刘莹莹, 李恋卿, 潘根兴, 张旭辉, 郑金伟. 人居生活废弃物生物黑炭对水溶液中Cd²⁺的吸附研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2012, 28(2): 181-186.
[7]	黄晓武, 刘杰, 张学洪, 孔淑琼, 朱义年. 不同化肥对水稻土中Cu吸附行为的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2011, 27(1): 29-33.
[8]	马良;徐仁扣. pH和添加有机物料对3种酸性土壤中磷吸附-解吸的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2010, 26(6): 596-599.
[9]	潘根兴, 张阿凤, 邹建文, 李恋卿, 张旭辉, 郑金伟. 农业废弃物生物黑炭转化还田作为低碳农业途径的探讨[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2010, 26(4): 394-400.
[10]	贾俊仙, 李忠佩, 刘明, 车玉萍. 施用氮肥对不同肥力红壤性水稻土硝化作用的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2010, 26(4): 329-333.
[11]	胡健, 康贻军, 杨连新, 朴哲, 殷士学. 水稻不同生育期土壤微生物区系对模拟Cr(Ⅵ)污水灌溉的响应[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2008, 24(4): 94-97.
[12]	张逸飞,钟文辉 , 李忠佩, 蔡祖聪. 长期不同施肥处理对红壤水稻土酶活性及微生物群落功能多样性的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2006, 22(4): 39-44.
[13]	李艳慧, 李恋卿, 潘根兴, 廖启林, 吴新民. 江苏宜兴地区农田土壤硒含量变异及其影响因素[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2006, 22(3): 61-64.
[14]	谢丹, 徐仁扣, 蒋新, 卞永荣. 2种水稻土中Cu(Ⅱ)和Pb(Ⅱ)的解吸动力学[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2006, 22(3): 65-69.
[15]	何利文, 石利利, 孔德洋, 单正军, 宗良纲. 呋喃丹和阿特拉津在土柱中的淋溶及其影响因素[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2006, 22(2): 71-74.