生态与农村环境学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 153-160.doi: 10.11934/j.issn.1673-4831.2018.02.008

• 污染控制与修复 • 上一篇    下一篇

置入式生态滤床对低温季节重污染河水水质的改善效果

刘福兴1, 杨林章2, 王俊力1, 邹国燕1   

  1. 1. 上海市农业科学院/上海低碳农业工程技术研究中心, 上海 201403;
    2. 江苏省农业科学院, 江苏 南京 210014
  • 收稿日期:2017-04-01 出版日期:2018-02-25 发布日期:2018-02-09
  • 通讯作者: 邹国燕,E-mail:zouguoyan@263.net E-mail:zouguoyan@263.net
  • 作者简介:刘福兴(1975-),男,吉林长春人,副研究员,主要从事水环境治理和水生态修复研究。E-mail:liufuxing@126.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2017ZX07203-005)

Effects of Inserted Ecological Filter Bed Improving Water Quality of Heavily Polluted River in Low-Temperature Seasons

LIU Fu-xing1, YANG Lin-zhang2, WANG Jun-li1, ZOU Guo-yan1   

  1. 1. Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Science/Shanghai Engineering Research Centre of Low-Carbon Agriculture, Shanghai 201403, China;
    2. Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Science, Nanjing 210014, China
  • Received:2017-04-01 Online:2018-02-25 Published:2018-02-09

摘要:

在传统水平潜流人工湿地(SSFW)的基础上,设计了一种下部存在水层的置入式生态滤床系统(IEF),对比研究了IEF和SSFW在不同季度的污染物去除效果。结果表明:与SSFW相比,IEF对污染物的去除率较高,在整个实验期间对总氮(TN)、氨氮(NH3-N)、总磷(TP)和高锰酸盐指数(CODMn)的总平均去除率分别为63.6%、78.4%、64.7%和51.9%,比SSFW高出13.1%、6.9%、12.1%和7.3%。温度对SSFW的去除率影响较大,在温度较低的第4季度(10-12月),SSFW的去除率明显下降,但IEF的处理效率依然能保持较高水平,对TN、NH3-N、TP和CODMn的平均去除率达57.9%、63.0%、58.7%和51.8%,比SSFW高12.8%、11.1%、10.2%和7.2%,表明IEF能够部分解决低温季节湿地处理效率低的问题,对重污染河流水质净化具有重要的指导意义。

关键词: 置入式生态滤床, 潜流人工湿地, 水质, 温度

Abstract:

On the basis of the traditional system of horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland (SSFW), a new system, namely, inserted ecological filter bed (IEF), was developed. Comparison was made between the two systems in pollutant removing effect in different seasons. Results show that IEF was higher than SSFW in pollutant removing rate and removed total nitrogen (TN), ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N), total phosphorus (TP) and permanganate index (CODMn) by 63.6%, 78.4%, 64.7% and 51.9%, respectively, on average, during the entire experiment period, which was 13.1%, 6.9%, 12.1% and 7.3%, respectively, higher than what the latter did. Temperature was an important factor affecting pollutant removing rate of SSFW. The rate dropped significantly during the fourth season (Oct. to Dec.) of a year when temperature is low, while IEF still maintained a relative high pollutant removing efficiency in winter, removing TN, NH3-N, TP and CODMn by 57.9%, 63.0%, 58.7% and 51.8%, respectively, which was 12.8%, 11.1%, 10.2% and 7.2%, higher than what SSFW did, respectively. All the findings in this experiment indicate that IEF can solve the problem of SSFW being low in pollutant removing efficiency in the low-temperature season, and has certain important significance in guiding purification of heavily polluted rivers.

Key words: inserted ecological filter bed, subsurface flow constructed wetland, water quality, temperature

中图分类号: