生态与农村环境学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (8): 1041-1049.doi: 10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2020.0808

• 自然保护与生态 • 上一篇    下一篇

稻-虾(克氏原螯虾)综合种养模式的碳足迹分析

刘金根1, 杨通2, 冯金飞2   

  1. 1. 苏州农业职业技术学院环境工程学院, 江苏 苏州 215008;
    2. 中国水稻研究所, 浙江 杭州 310006
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-28 出版日期:2021-08-25 发布日期:2021-08-27
  • 通讯作者: 刘金根 E-mail:jingenliu@163.com
  • 作者简介:刘金根(1969-)男,江苏盐城人,副教授,博士,主要从事生态农业和环境保护方面的教学与科研工作。E-mail:jingenliu@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(41877548);江苏省农业农村厅农业软科学研究课题(18ASS006)

Carbon Footprint Analysis of Rice-Procambarus clarkii Integrated Farming System

LIU Jin-gen1, YANG Tong2, FENG Jin-fei2   

  1. 1. Environmental Engineering Department, Suzhou Polytechnic Institute of Agriculture, Suzhou 215008, China;
    2. China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 310006, China
  • Received:2020-09-28 Online:2021-08-25 Published:2021-08-27

摘要: 探明稻-虾(克氏原螯虾)综合种养模式的碳足迹大小及其构成特征,对促进稻-虾综合种养低碳发展具有重要意义。该研究采用问卷调查法,运用碳足迹理论系统分析稻-虾生产模式碳足迹产生及其构成,并进一步分析其主要影响因素。结果表明:稻-虾生产模式下单位面积碳足迹为7 859 kg·hm-2(以CO2当量计,全文同),介于稻-麦(10 650 kg·hm-2)和单季稻生产模式(5 483 kg·hm-2)之间;单位产值和单位利润碳足迹分别为0.11和0.26 kg·元-1(以CO2当量计,全文同),分别比稻-麦和单季稻生产模式降低64.26%、60.65%和67.37%、45.02%。与稻-麦相比,稻-虾生产模式显著降低直接碳排放,间接碳排放无显著性差异;与单季稻相比,稻-虾生产模式显著提高间接碳排放,对直接碳排放无显著影响。稻-虾生产模式下,碳足迹大小与虾产量、产值和利润呈"抛物线"型变化趋势,在碳足迹为7 458、7 855和7 363 kg·hm-2时能够分别获得产量、产值和利润最大化。生产规模对稻-虾生产模式碳足迹具有显著影响,小规模(<5.00 hm2)和大规模(>20.00 hm2)生产有利于降低碳足迹、提高产值和利润。总之,相对于传统稻田生产方式,稻-虾生产模式能够有效减排增效,但应关注碳足迹与经济效益之间的权衡点,促进稻-虾生产模式的绿色高效发展。

关键词: 克氏原螯虾, 综合种养, 碳足迹, 生产规模, 温室气体

Abstract: Investigating the size and composition of carbon footprint is a key issue for the low carbon development of rice-Procambarus clarkii integrated farming system (R-P) in China. In this study, a field investigation was conducted to analyze the composition of the carbon footprint of R-P with carbon footprint theory and its major influencing factors. The results show that the carbon footprint per area of R-P was 7 859 kg·hm-2, which was between that of rice-wheat farming system(R-W, 10 650 kg·hm-2) and single rice farming system(SR, 5 483 kg·hm-2). The carbon footprint per unit output value and carbon footprint per unit profit of R-P are 0.11 and 0.26 kg·Yuan-1, which are 64.26% and 60.65% lower than that of rice-wheat farming system and 67.37% and 45.02% lower than that of single rice farming system, respectively. R-P significantly decreased direct carbon emissions, but did not affect indirect carbon emissions, compared with rice-wheat farming system. And R-P significantly increased indirect carbon emissions, but did not affect direct carbon emissions, compared with the single rice farming system. The carbon footprint of R-P showed a "parabola" trend with Procambarus clarkii yield, output value and profit. When the carbon footprint reached to 7 458, 7 855, and 7 363 kg·hm-2, the yield, output value and profit of R-P can be maximized, respectively. The scale of R-P farm has a significant impact on the carbon footprint of R-P. The small-scale (< 5.00 hm2) and large-scale (> 20.00 hm2) farm is conducive to reducing the carbon footprint and increasing output value and profits. Overall, R-P can effectively reduce emissions and increase efficiency, compared with the traditional farming systems. However, we should pay attention to the trade-off between carbon footprint and economic benefits in order to promote the green and efficient development of R-P.

Key words: Procambarus clarkii, integrated farming system, carbon footprint, production scale, greenhouse gases

中图分类号: