生态与农村环境学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (7): 885-895.doi: 10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2022.0619

• 区域环境与发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

湿地保护对农户生计结果的影响及作用机制:基于自然保护区问卷调查的实证研究

武照亮, 曹虎, 靳敏   

  1. 中国人民大学环境学院, 北京 100872
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-20 出版日期:2023-07-25 发布日期:2023-07-19
  • 通讯作者: 曹虎,E-mail:caohu@ruc.edu.cn E-mail:caohu@ruc.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:武照亮(1992-),男,山西晋中人,博士生,主要研究方向为环境社会治理、环境政策与管理、资源与环境价值评估。E-mail:2017101021@ruc.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    北京市社会科学基金重大项目(20ZDA04);国家重点研发计划(2018YFC0213702)

Influence Mechanism of Wetland Conservation on the Livelihood Outcomes of Farmers': An Empirical Study Based on the Survey of Rural Households in Natural Reserves

WU Zhao-liang, CAO Hu, JIN Min   

  1. School of Environment & Natural Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
  • Received:2022-06-20 Online:2023-07-25 Published:2023-07-19

摘要: 准确评估生态环境保护对居民生计结果的影响及作用机制,对解决保护与发展的矛盾具有重要意义。基于可持续生计模型,构建湿地保护背景下农户生计结果的分析框架,利用云南省大山包黑颈鹤自然保护区农户问卷调查数据,采用偏微分最小二乘法的结构方程模型,分析农户参与湿地保护对生计结果的影响机制。结果表明,农户参与湿地保护对家庭收入的直接效应为负,并通过"湿地保护-生计资本-生计策略-家庭收入"链条产生正向间接影响,但间接影响效应低于直接影响效应,因此农户参与湿地保护对家庭收入的总效应显著为负。农户参与湿地保护对家庭减贫和主观福祉的直接效应均为正,并通过"湿地保护-生计资本-生计策略-家庭减贫/主观福祉"链条产生正向间接影响,因此农户参与湿地保护对家庭减贫和主观福祉的总效应显著为正。相较部分退耕农户样本,湿地保护对生计结果的影响效应和显著性在全部退耕农户样本中表现更明显。基于此,针对农户生计选择和区域可持续发展提出相关建议:增强湿地保护政策与当地居民生计发展的结合力度,有效促进农户生计资本积累;积极推广经济林木种植和生态养殖业,推动集约化发展,促进农业转型;合理规划和发展生态旅游,鼓励外出务工,引入生态产业、养老产业等产业模式,号召年轻群体回乡创业等为农户提供多种就业机会,促进生计多样化发展。

关键词: 湿地保护, 可持续生计, 生计结果, 结构方程模型

Abstract: Accurately evaluating the impact and mechanism of ecological environmental protection on residents' livelihoods is of great significance for solving the conflicts between protection and development. Based on the sustainable livelihood model, this paper constructs the analysis framework of farmers' livelihood outcomes from the background of wetland conservation. Questionnaire survey data of farmers in the Dashanbao Black-necked Crane Nature Reserve in Yunnan Province were collected to estimate the influence mechanism of wetland conservation on rural households' livelihood outcomes by using the Structural Equation Model based on the partial differential least squares method. According to the results, participation in wetland conservation has a direct and negative impact on households' income, but a positive and indirect effect through the chain of "wetland conservation-livelihood capital-livelihood strategy-household income". Comparatively, the indirect effect is lower than the direct effect. Therefore, the total effect is significantly negative. Moreover, participation in wetland conservation has a direct and positive impact on households' poverty alleviation and subjective well-being, and a positive and indirect effect through the chain of "wetland conservation-livelihood capital-livelihood strategy-poverty alleviation/subjective well-being". Therefore, the total effect is significantly positive. Compared with samples partially participating in wetland restoration, the impact of wetland conservation on the livelihood outcomes is more obvious in samples returning all farmland to wetland. Based on the findings, this study proposes the following three practical suggestions regarding farmers' livelihood selection and regional sustainable development. Firstly, policymakers should promote the combination of wetland conservation policy and the livelihood development of local residents, and effectively increase the accumulation of their livelihood capital. Secondly, decision-makers should actively promote economic forest planting and ecological livestock breeding to achieve intensive development and agricultural transformation. Finally, the government should plan and develop eco-tourism, encourage migrant working, introduce ecological, pension, and other industrial models, call on young people to return to their hometown for entrepreneurial activities to provide a variety of employment opportunities for the local farmers, and promote the diversification of their livelihood strategies.

Key words: wetland conservation, sustainable livelihood, livelihood outcome, structural equation model

中图分类号: