国外危险废物填埋场退役资金预提留制度研究及其对中国的启示

doi:10.11934/j.issn.1673-4831.2018.07.013

Abstract

Abstract:

In the 1980s, U. S., EU, Japan and other developed countries respectively established management systems of withholding decommission fund for hazardous wastes landfill sites. The experiences from developed countries show that the system can not only effectively ensured the financial sources for the closure and maintenance of decommissioned hazardous wastes landfill sites, but also successfully controll the long-term environmental risks. By studying the systems and experiences of developed countries, the paper systematically analyzed the management systems of withholding decommission fund for hazardous wastes landfill sites from the perspectives of laws and regulations, cost estimate method for the decommission fund and management systems etc.. Based on the analyses, the calculation method for the decommission fund for hazardous wastes landfill sites in China has been established and case analysis conducted. Recommendations for the improvement based on the development status of the management systems in this regard in China has been proposed:To incorporate the withholding plan into the permit management for hazardous wastes landfill sites to guarantee the implementation of decommission fund management; To conduct supervision and management based on the annual evaluation requirements for the standardized management of operators; The landfill sites operators should calculate decommission fund according to the calculation method, deposit the fund in the special account for management or transfer the fund to government designated institutions for management in the form of guaranty, and incorporate the fund into investment budget or operation costs; The landfill site operators should apply to the environment authority for decommission and get approval, then withdraw and use the decommission fund year by year based on the actual expenditure.

Key words: hazardous waste landfill site, decommission fund estimate, decommission fund withholding system

CLC Number:

XU Juan, JIANG Wen-bo, GUO Rui, ZHANG Jun, ZHENG Yang. Review on the Closure Fees Withholding System of Hazardous Waste Landfill Site in Foreign Countries and Its Inspirations for China[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2018, 34(7): 667-672.

References

[1] 中华人民共和国固体废物污染环境防治法[Z/OL].[2007-10-17].http://www.npc.gov.cn/wxzl/gongbao/2013-10/22/content_1811015.htm.
[2] 42 U.S.C.§6901 et seq.(1976),Resource Conservation and Recovery Act[Z/OL].[2017-10-17].http://www.epa.gov/rcra.
[3] 40CFR[264.143(i) & 264.145(i)],Financial Assurance for RCRA Closure and Post-Closure Care,2002[Z/OL].[2017-10-17].http://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2014-title40-vol26/xml/CFR-2014-title40-vol26-part264-subpartG.xml.
[4] 40CFR[264.143(a)-(f) and 264.145(a)-(f)],RCRA Financial Assurance:Mechanisms for Financial Assurance[Z/OL].[2017-10-17].http://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2014-title40-vol26/xml/CFR-2014-title40-vol26-part264-subpartG.xml.
[5] 40CFR(264-265),Closure and Post-Closure Care Requirements for Hazardous Waste Treatment,Storage and Disposal Facilities[Z/OL].[2017-10-17].http://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2014-title40-vol26/xml/CFR-2014-title40-vol26-part265-subpartG.xml.
[6] 40CFR 264.142(b),Applicable to Owners and Operators of Closed and Closing Hazardous Waste Management Facilities;Post-Closure Permit Requirement; Closure Process[Z/OL].[2017-10-17].http://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2014-title40-vol26/xml/CFR-2014-title40-vol26-part264-subpartG.xml.
[7] Article 23,Chapter Ⅳ,Directive 2008/98/EC on Waste and Repealing Certain Directive[Z/OL].[2017-10-17].http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32008L0098.
[8] Directive 1999/31/EC,EU Landfill Directive[Z/OL].[2017-10-17].http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:31999L0031.
[9] Environment Agency of UK.Guidance and Templates for Landfill Operators on the Technical Standards Required to Meet Environmental Protection and Permit Conditions[Z/OL].[2017-10-17].http://www.gov.uk/government/collections/environmental-permitting-landfill-sector-technical-guidance.
[10] Environment Agency of UK.Guidance of Landfill Development on Groundwater Risk Assessment for Leachate[Z/OL].[2017-10-17].http://www.gov.uk/guidance/landfill-developments-groundwater-risk-assessment-for-leachate.
[11] Environment Agency of UK.Financial Provision for Landfill[Z/OL].[2017-10-17].http://www.gov.uk/government/publications/financial-provision-for-landfill.
[12] 陈燕平,胡华龙,李治琨.日本固体废物管理与资源化技术[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2007:27-28.
[13] Ministry of Environment of Japan.Regulations of Waste Management and Public Cleansing Law[Z/OL].[2017-10-17].http://www.env.go.jp/en/index.html.
[14] KISSIDA J,SPIELER R,CASAZZA J.Cost-Effective Landfill Closure:Boston's "Menino Project"[J].Practice Periodical of Hazardous,Toxic,and Radioactive Waste Management,2001,5(1):33-39.
[15] 环境保护部办公厅.《危险废物填埋污染控制标准》(征求意见稿)及编制说明:环办函
[2015] 491号[A/OL].(2015-04-03)[2017-10-17].http://www.zhb.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgth/201504/t20150414_299049.htm.
[16] 环境保护部办公厅.环境污染强制责任保险管理办法(征求意见稿):环办政法函
[2017] 890号[A/OL].(2017-06-09)[2017-10-17].http://www.zhb.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgth/201706/t20170609_415774.htm.
[17] 徐亚,能昌信,刘玉强,等.基于环境风险的危险废物填埋场安全寿命周期评价[J].中国环境科学,2016,36(6):1802-1809.[XU Ya,NAI Chang-xin,LIU Yu-qiang,et al.Risk-Based Method to Assess the Safe Life of Hazardous Waste Landfill[J].China Environmental Science,2016,36(6):1802-1809.]
[18] 徐亚,能昌信,刘峰.填埋场长期渗漏的环境风险评价方法与案例研究[J].中国环境科学,2015,28(4):605-612.[XU Ya,NAI Chang-xin,LIU Feng.Method and Case Study to Evaluate Long-Term Environmental Risks From Landfill Leakage[J].China Environmental Science,2015,28(4):605-612.]

Review on the Closure Fees Withholding System of Hazardous Waste Landfill Site in Foreign Countries and Its Inspirations for China

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	LIN Li-mei, HAN Ya-qing. Influencing Factors and Regulatory Strategies on Large-Scale Pig Farmers' Environmentally Friendly Behaviors: An Exploratory Research Based on Grounded Theory [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2019, 35(10): 1259-1267.
[2]	JIANG Ye-lin, WANG Rang-hui, PENG Qing, LI Yan, LI Cheng, GUO Jing. Study on Landscape Changes and Carbon Budget Situation in Arid Land: A Case Study in Tarim Basin, Xinjiang [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2019, 35(7): 875-884.
[3]	ZHANG Peng, LIU Yao-yao, WANG Peng-fei, LI Shi-feng. Research on County Ecological Compensation Mechanism in the Process of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Integration: A Case Study of Dingxing County in Baoding City [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2019, 35(6): 747-755.
[4]	SHI Ma-li, WANG Na, GUO Xin-yan, SHAN Zheng-jun, WANG Ying. A Review of Discussion on the Difference of Pollutant Discharge Permit Policy for the Pesticide Industry Between China and the US [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2019, 35(2): 151-157.
[5]	WANG Xiao-jun, TIAN Jin-jia, ZHANG Xiao-tong, YU Lin-jun, DUAN Jin-ming. Research on Changes of Rural Farming Landscape Based on Villagers' Memories [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2019, 35(1): 115-120.
[6]	WU Ai-bin, ZHAO Yan-xia, SHEN Hui-tao, QIN Yan-jie, LIU Xin. Spatio-Temporal Pattern Evolution of Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2018, 34(11): 968-975.
[7]	ZHAO Ran-ran, ZHOU Jun-ying, XU Wei-li. Derivation of Aquatic Life Criteria for Malathion [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2018, 34(8): 733-738.
[8]	GU Kang-kang, YANG Qian-qian, CHENG Fan, CHU Jin-long, CHEN Xiao-hua. Spatial Differentiation of Anhui Province Based on the Relationship Between Supply and Demand of Ecosystem Services [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2018, 34(7): 577-583.
[9]	XU Meng-jia, WANG Yan, ZOU Chang-xin. Value Evaluation of Ecological Assets in Ecological Protection Redline Areas [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2018, 34(6): 528-534.
[10]	GUO Li-feng, ZHANG Hui, LIU Ming-zhe, WANG Zhen-guo, ZHANG Rui-hao. Research on Evaluation System of Ecological Benefits for Rural River Regulation [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2018, 34(5): 474-480.
[11]	LOU Yong-cai, GUO Qing-xia. Sensitivity Analysis of AnnAGNPS Model Parameters in Chakou Watershed [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2018, 34(3): 207-215.
[12]	YANG Xian-hai, LIU Hui-hui, LIU Ji-ning, WANG Lei, WANG Zhen, WU Sheng-min, SHI Li-li. Status Quo of Management of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals in Abroad and Corresponding Strategies for China [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2018, 34(2): 104-113.
[13]	MENG Xiang-hai, ZHOU Hai-chuan, ZHOU Hai-wen. Balancing of Planting-Breeding on a Region Scale and Factors Affecting Willingness of Livestock Farms for Planting-Breeding Combination: A Case Study in Jiangsu Province [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2018, 34(2): 132-139.
[14]	WANG Yong-gang, WANG Xu, LI Ming-wei, WU Juan-li, ZHANG Nan, XU Fei. Status Quo of and Problems in Delimiting of Livestock/Poultry Breeding Forbidden Zones in China [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2017, 33(7): 615-621.
[15]	HUANG Ze-ying, WANG Ji-min. Perception of Scale and Risk of Livestock Rearing and Its Impact on Perception of Epidemic Prevention Arrangement of Broiler Farms: Based on Survey of 331 Broiler Farm Households [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2017, 33(6): 499-508.