基于“问题-风险”认知体系的县域国土空间生态保护修复格局构建与对策研究

doi:10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2022.0410

Abstract

Abstract: Identifying critical areas for ecological protection and restoration and forming different remediation and restoration strategies are required for ecological protection and restoration in territorial space. However, the relationship between natural ecosystems and socioeconomic systems was seldom considered in identifying the critical areas. And the ecological risks were seldom investigated. In this study, based on ecosystem services' protection and restoration needs, a research framework for ecological protection and restoration of territorial space was established with a "trouble-risk" cognitive system. Primary ecosystem services in a typical rapid urbanization area were first evaluated by using the InVEST model, including habitat maintenance, water resource conservation, soil and water conservation, carbon sequestration and oxygen release. The critical areas that requiring protection and the degradation areas that needing remediation were then identified. The degradation risk areas of the ecosystem services were determined by using the landscape ecological risk assessment method. Finally, a comprehensive pattern has been established and a strategy for territorial space ecological protection and restoration in the area is proposed. The conclusions of the study are:(1) The spatial distributions of ecosystem services in the study area were significantly different, and some regions showed significant degradation. (2) The degradation risk of ecosystem service during the study period (2019) was generally low, with which, 7.38% accounted as relatively high-risk and high-risk areas, 38.14% as low-risk areas, and 53.45% as relatively lower-risk areas. (3) Based on the pattern of ecological protection and restoration in the territorial space, differentiated strategies are proposed, including improving the existing reserve planning system, paying attention to the ecological restoration of the cultivated land landscape on the south side of Qishan Forest Park, and strengthening the risk control of river landscapes.

Key words: ecological protection and restoration, landscape ecological risk, ecosystem service, ecological environment, county area

CLC Number:

X321
K901

CHENG Yong, ZHANG Xiao-lin. Research on the Construction of Ecological Protection and Restoration Patterns of County Territorial Space Based on the “Trouble-risk” Cognitive System and the Corresponding Countermeasures[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2023, 39(7): 907-917.

References 38

[1]	COSTANZA R, DE GROOT R, SUTTON P, et al.Changes in the Global Value of Ecosystem Services[J].Global Environmental Change, 2014, 26:152-158.
[2]	MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment).Ecosystems and Human Well-being[M].Washington DC:Island Press, 2005:1-10.
[3]	CHEN W X.Urbanization and Ecosystem Services:The Multi-scale Spatial Spillover Effects and Spatial Variations[J].Land Use Policy, 2022, 114:105964.
[4]	王志芳, 高世昌, 苗利梅, 等.国土空间生态保护修复范式研究[J].中国土地科学, 2020, 34(3):1-8.[WANG Zhi-fang, GAO Shi-chang, MIAO Li-mei, et al.Paradigm Research for Territorial Ecological Protection and Restoration[J].China Land Science, 2020, 34(3):1-8.]
[5]	彭建, 李冰, 董建权, 等.论国土空间生态修复基本逻辑[J].中国土地科学, 2020, 34(5):18-26.[PENG Jian, LI Bing, DONG Jian-quan, et al.Basic Logic of Territorial Ecological Restoration[J].China Land Science, 2020, 34(5):18-26.]
[6]	岳文泽, 侯丽, 夏皓轩, 等.基于生态系统服务供需平衡的宁夏固原生态修复分区与优化策略[J].应用生态学报, 2022, 33(1):149-158.[YUE Wen-ze, HOU Li, XIA Hao-xuan, et al.Territorially Ecological Restoration Zoning and Optimization Strategy in Guyuan City of Ningxia, China:Based on the Balance of Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(1):149-158.]
[7]	姜莉欣.吉林省西部草地生态系统服务变化及修复策略研究[D].长春:吉林大学, 2021.[JIANG Li-xin.Ecosystem Services Changes and Restoration Strategies of Grassland in Western Jilin Province[D].Changchun:Jilin University, 2021.]
[8]	吴健生, 罗可雨, 马洪坤, 等.基于生态系统服务与引力模型的珠三角生态安全与修复格局研究[J].生态学报, 2020, 40(23):8417-8429.[WU Jian-sheng, LUO Ke-yu, MA Hong-kun, et al.Ecological Security and Restoration Pattern of Pearl River Delta, Based on Ecosystem Service and Gravity Model[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(23):8417-8429.]
[9]	HUANG Z X, QIAN L Y, CAO W Z.Developing a Novel Approach Integrating Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity for Identifying Priority Ecological Reserves[J].Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2022, 179:106128.
[10]	CHEN D S, PAN Y Q, JIN X L, et al.The Delineation of Ecological Redline Area for Catchment Sustainable Management from the Perspective of Ecosystem Services and Social Needs:A Case Study of the Xiangjiang Watershed, China[J].Ecological Indicators, 2021, 121:107130.
[11]	欧阳晓, 朱翔, 贺清云.基于生态系统服务和生态系统健康的生态风险评价:以长株潭城市群为例[J].生态学报, 2020, 40(16):5478-5489.[OUYANG Xiao, ZHU Xiang, HE Qing-yun.Incorporating Ecosystem Services with Ecosystem Health for Ecological Risk Assessment:Case Study in Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan Urban Agglomeration, China[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(16):5478-5489.]
[12]	刘珍环, 张国杰, 付凤杰.基于景观格局-服务的景观生态风险评价:以广州市为例[J].生态学报, 2020, 40(10):3295-3302.[LIU Zhen-huan, ZHANG Guo-jie, FU Feng-jie.Assessing Landscape Ecological Risk Based on Landscape Pattern and Services in Guangzhou during 1990-2015[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(10):3295-3302.]
[13]	张晓琳, 金晓斌, 韩博, 等.长江下游平原区生态网络识别与优化:以常州市金坛区为例[J].生态学报, 2021, 41(9):3449-3461.[ZHANG Xiao-lin, JIN Xiao-bin, HAN Bo, et al.Identification and Optimization of Ecological Network in the Plain Area of the Lower Yangtze River:A Case Study of Jintan District, Changzhou[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(9):3449-3461.]
[14]	杨君, 周鹏全, 袁淑君, 等.基于InVEST模型的洞庭湖生态经济区生态系统服务功能研究[J].水土保持通报, 2022, 42(1):267-272, 282.[YANG Jun, ZHOU Peng-quan, YUAN Shu-jun, et al.Land Ecosystem Service Functions for Dongting Lake Ecological Economic Zone Based on InVEST Model[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 42(1):267-272, 282.]
[15]	戈健宅, 李涛, 齐增湘, 等.基于生态风险评估的生态补偿空间识别及分配:以洞庭湖生态经济区为例[J].生态与农村环境学报, 2022, 38(4):472-484.[GE Jian-zhai, LI Tao, QI Zeng-xiang, et al.Identification and Allocation of Ecological Compensation Space Based on Ecological Risk Assessment:A Case Study of Dongting Lake Eco-economic Zone[J].Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2022, 38(4):472-484.]
[16]	YANG J, HUANG X.The 30 m Annual Land Cover Dataset and Its Dynamics in China from 1990 to 2019[J].Earth System Science Data, 2021, 13(8):3907-3925.
[17]	FAN Y T, GAN L, HONG C Q, et al.Spatial Identification and Determinants of Trade-offs among Multiple Land Use Functions in Jiangsu Province, China[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 772:145022.
[18]	STRASSBURG B B N, IRIBARREM A, BEYER H L, et al.Global Priority Areas for Ecosystem Restoration[J].Nature, 2020, 586(7831):724-729.
[19]	ASAAD I, LUNDQUIST C J, ERDMANN M V, et al.Ecological Criteria to Identify Areas for Biodiversity Conservation[J].Biological Conservation, 2017, 213:309-316.
[20]	ZUO L Y, GAO J B, DU F J.The Pairwise Interaction of Environmental Factors for Ecosystem Services Relationships in Karst Ecological Priority Protection and Key Restoration Areas[J].Ecological Indicators, 2021, 131:108125.
[21]	XU W H, XIAO Y, ZHANG J J, et al.Strengthening Protected Areas for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in China[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017, 114(7):1601-1606.
[22]	KOMONEN A, TUOMINEN L, PURHONEN J, et al.Landscape Structure Influences Browsing on a Keystone Tree Species in Conservation Areas[J].Forest Ecology and Management, 2020, 457:117724.
[23]	CROUZEILLES R, CURRAN M, FERREIRA M S, et al.A Global Meta-analysis on the Ecological Drivers of Forest Restoration Success[J].Nature Communications, 2016, 7:11666.
[24]	COBAN O, DE DEYN G B, VAN DER PLOEG M.Soil Microbiota as Game-changers in Restoration of Degraded Lands[J].Science, 2022, 375(6584):abe0725.
[25]	PALMER M, RUHI A.Linkages between Flow Regime, Biota, and Ecosystem Processes:Implications for River Restoration[J].Science, 2019, 365(6459):eaaw2087.
[26]	MOORE J W, SCHINDLER D E.Getting Ahead of Climate Change for Ecological Adaptation and Resilience[J].Science, 2022, 376(6600):1421-1426.
[27]	欧阳志云, 杜傲, 徐卫华.中国自然保护地体系分类研究[J].生态学报, 2020, 40(20):7207-7215.[OUYANG Zhi-yun, DU Ao, XU Wei-hua.Research on China's Protected Area System Classification[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(20):7207-7215.]
[28]	ALBERT C, SPANGENBERG J H, SCHRÖTER B.Nature-based Solutions:Criteria[J].Nature, 2017, 543(7645):315.
[29]	雷少刚, 卞正富, 杨永均.论引导型矿山生态修复[J].煤炭学报, 2022, 47(2):915-921.[LEI Shao-gang, BIAN Zheng-fu, YANG Yong-jun.Discussion on the Guided Restoration for Mine Ecosystem[J].Journal of China Coal Society, 2022, 47(2):915-921.]
[30]	张立伟, 傅伯杰, 吕一河, 等.基于综合指标法的中国生态系统服务保护有效性评价研究[J].地理学报, 2016, 71(5):768-780.[ZHANG Li-wei, FU Bo-jie, LÜ Yi-he, et al.The Using of Composite Indicators to Assess the Conservational Effectiveness of Ecosystem Services in China[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(5):768-780.]
[31]	TALLIS H T, RICKETTS T, GUERRY A D, et al.InVEST 2.2.1 User's Guide[Z].Stanford:The Natural Capital Project, 2011.
[32]	张静静, 朱文博, 朱连奇, 等.伏牛山地区森林生态系统服务权衡/协同效应多尺度分析[J].地理学报, 2020, 75(5):975-988.[ZHANG Jing-jing, ZHU Wen-bo, ZHU Lian-qi, et al.Multi-scale Analysis of Trade-off/Synergy Effects of Forest Ecosystem Services in the Funiu Mountain Region[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(5):975-988.]
[33]	WISCHMEIER W H, JOHNSON C B, CROSS B V.Soil Erodibility Nomograph for Farmland and Construction Sites[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1971, 26:189-193.
[34]	WILLIAMS J R, JONES C A, DYKE P T.A Modeling Approach to Determining the Relationship between Erosion and Soil Productivity[J].Transactions of the ASAE, 1984, 27(1):129-144.
[35]	郭云, 李鹏, 程维金, 等.洞庭湖土地利用和生态服务功能时空变化及其耦合效应分析[J].环境科学学报, 2022, 42(1):121-130.[GUO Yun, LI Peng, CHENG Wei-jin, et al.Evaluation and Complex Relations Analysis of Ecosystem Services Based on Spatial-temporal Change of Land Use in Dongting Lake[J].Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2022, 42(1):121-130.]
[36]	BAI Y, CHEN Y, ALATALO J M, et al.Scale Effects on the Relationships between Land Characteristics and Ecosystem Services:A Case Study in Taihu Lake Basin, China[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 716:137083.
[37]	许凤娇, 吕晓.基于土地利用变化的江苏沿海地区生态风险格局[J].生态学报, 2018, 38(20):7312-7325.[XU Feng-jiao, LÜ Xiao.Ecological Risk Pattern Based on Land Use Changes in Jiangsu Coastal Areas[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(20):7312-7325.]
[38]	吕乐婷, 张杰, 孙才志, 等.基于土地利用变化的细河流域景观生态风险评估[J].生态学报, 2018, 38(16):5952-5960.[LÜ Le-ting, ZHANG Jie, SUN Cai-zhi, et al.Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment of Xi River Basin Based on Land-use Change[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(16):5952-5960.]

Research on the Construction of Ecological Protection and Restoration Patterns of County Territorial Space Based on the “Trouble-risk” Cognitive System and the Corresponding Countermeasures

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References 38

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	LI Hai-dong, MA Wei-bo, ZHANG Long-jiang, Lü Yu-juan, LIU Chen-yi, ZHAO Li-jun. Synergistic Governance of Urban Ecology and Environment:From the Perspectives of Ecological Resilience and Synergistic Efficiency [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2023, 39(8): 1096-1102.
[2]	YANG Zheng-zhong, XU Xi-bao, LI Jing-yi, LIANG Cai-ping. Progress and Prospects of Research on Ecosystem Service Flow [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2023, 39(7): 827-838.
[3]	FANG Chao-yang, CAI Zhen-rao, ZHAO Hua-fei, HE Qing-hua, LIU Zhi-yong. Urban-rural Gradient Feature of Matching Ecosystem Services Supply and Demand in the Main Area of Nanchang [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2023, 39(6): 713-722.
[4]	LI Kang-wei, ZENG Xian-gang, WANG Qi. Coupling Relationship and Driving Factors between Coal Development Intensity and Ecosystem Services in Huainan City [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2023, 39(6): 723-733.
[5]	LI Han-ting, TIAN Mei-rong, HUO Xiao-jun, YOU Chun-he, NIE Hua-yue, GAO Ji-xi. Exploring the Impact of Lake Sediment Based Planting Substrates on Forage Growth: An Experimental Analysis [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2023, 39(6): 750-757.
[6]	ZHANG Bing, LI Yang-bing, XIA Chun-hua, ZENG Chen-cen. Study on the Coupling Coordination of Socio-economic and Ecological Environment under the Background of Land Use Transition: A Case Study of the Cities Along the Yangtze River [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2023, 39(4): 436-449.
[7]	GAO Xing, SONG Zhao-ying, LI Chen-xi, TANG Huai-zhi. Landscape Pattern Optimization in Baiyangdian Basin Based on Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2023, 39(2): 174-183.
[8]	SUN Xin-xin, XUE Jian-hui, DONG Li-na. Spatiotemporal Change and Prediction of Carbon Storage in Nanjing Ecosystem Based on PLUS Model and InVEST Model [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2023, 39(1): 41-51.
[9]	LU Xiao-song, WANG Guo-qing, LI Xu-zhi, DU Jun-yang, SUN Li. Research Progress of Big Data of Site Environment Acquisition and Machine Learning Method in Pollution Intelligent Identification [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2022, 38(9): 1101-1111.
[10]	LIANG Cai-ping, XU Xi-bao, LI Jing-yi. A Study on the Supply and Demand of Ecosystem Services in the Taihu Lake Basin from 1995 to 2018 [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2022, 38(9): 1221-1228.
[11]	ZHAO Li-jun, LI Hai-dong, MA Wei-bo, WANG Nan, QIU Kuan-biao, ZHANG Long-jiang, LIU Chen-wei. Observation Indicators of Eco-city Construction Under the Perspective of Harmonious Co-existence Between Human and Nature [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2022, 38(8): 953-962.
[12]	CHEN Zi-long, LIN Jing-yu, HUANG Jin-liang. Study on Freshwater Ecosystem Service Flow in Watersheds of Southeastern Fujian under Water Pollution Stress [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2022, 38(8): 1051-1063.
[13]	FENG Rong-rong, ZHANG Kai-li, HAN Jia-ning, LI Ying-hui, LIU Qi-qi, LIU Kang. Remote Sensing Evaluation and Influence Factor Analysis of Ecological Environment Quality in the Fenghe River Watershed [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2022, 38(7): 860-871.
[14]	ZHAO Ting, PAN Jing-hu. Multi-scale Measurement of Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Taolai River Basin [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2022, 38(7): 839-850.
[15]	FANG Lin, CAI Jun, LIU Yan-xiao, YUAN Hong-wei, LI Can-feng. Dynamic Evolution of Ecosystem Service Value in Yangtze River Delta and Analysis on the Driving Factors [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2022, 38(5): 556-565.