不同钝化剂对弱酸性镉污染土壤的钝化效果

    Study on the Passivation Effect of Different Treatments on Weakly Acidic Cadmium Polluted Soil

    • 摘要: 农田重金属污染土壤的修复是我国当前面临的一个环境难题。采集河南嵩县马石沟镉污染农田土壤作为供试土壤,采用室内培养试验法,分别添加熟石灰、方解石、沸石、蒙脱石和生物炭5种钝化材料,采用Tessier修正顺序七步提取法对镉形态含量进行分析,研究不同钝化剂在1%、3%和5%添加量条件下对弱酸性土壤镉污染的钝化效果。结果显示,供试5种钝化材料在不同程度上提升了土壤pH值,对pH值提升效果由大到小依次为熟石灰、方解石、蒙脱石、生物炭和沸石,其中,熟石灰处理土壤pH值提升2.00~2.50个单位,方解石处理提升0.86~1.38个单位,蒙脱石处理提升0.83~1.19个单位,生物炭处理提升0.07~0.38个单位,沸石处理提升0.11~0.20个单位。5种钝化剂对土壤离子交换态Cd含量均有降低作用,但其效果差异明显,钝化效果由大到小依次为熟石灰、方解石、生物炭、蒙脱石和沸石。培养50 d后,1%、3%和5%添加量条件下,熟石灰处理交换态Cd含量降低率为76.65%~90.66%,方解石处理交换态Cd含量降低率为46.12%~53.77%,生物炭处理交换态Cd含量降低率为9.36%~33.03%,蒙脱石处理交换态Cd含量降低率为11.72%~19.14%,沸石处理交换态Cd含量降低率仅为0%~10.94%。5种钝化剂的添加在不同程度上改变了土壤中不同形态Cd含量比例,对弱结合态(碳酸盐结合态、腐殖酸结合态和铁锰氧化物结合态)Cd含量比例提升作用显著,对强结合态(强有机结合态、硅酸盐残余态)Cd含量比例也有一定提升作用。总体来看,熟石灰、方解石对交换态Cd含量的降低幅度较大,生物炭钝化效果居中,蒙脱石和沸石的钝化效果较差。在室内培养试验条件下,综合考虑钝化剂对土壤pH值和Cd钝化效率的影响,以3%方解石作为弱酸性Cd污染土壤的钝化剂为最好。方解石作为天然非金属矿物兼具钝化效果显著、材料廉价易得、环境友好等特性,可为弱酸性Cd污染土壤原位钝化修复提供理论依据。

       

      Abstract: The remediation of farmland soil contaminated by heavy metal is a difficult environmental issue in China. In this study, cadmium (Cd)-contaminated farmland soil from Mashigou, Songxian County of Henan Province was collected as the test soil, and five treatments, including hydrated lime, calcite, zeolite, montmorillonite and biochar, were added and assessed using an indoor culture test method. The Tessier modified sequential seven-step extraction method was used to analyze the Cd speciation content in the treated soil. The passivation effect of different treatments on Cd pollution at 1%, 3% and 5% was then assessed in weakly acidic soil. Results show that the five treatments increased the soil pH in the order of: hydrated lime (2.00-2.50 unit increase) > calcite (0.86-1.38 unit increase) > montmorillonite (0.83-1.19 unit increase) > biochar (0.07-0.38 unit increase) > zeolite (0.11-0.20 unit increase). The five treatments all reduced the content of ion exchangeable Cd in soil, but their effects were substantially different. The passivating sequence was as follows: hydrated lime > calcite > biochar > montmorillonite > zeolite. After 50 days of culture with treatments at 1%, 3% and 5%, the reductions in exchangeable Cd were 76.65%-90.66% with hydrated lime, 46.12%-53.77% with calcite, 9.36%-33.03% with biochar, 11.72%-19.14% with montmorillonite, and only 0%-10.94% with zeolite. The treatments changed the proportion of Cd forms in soil to different degrees. The proportions of weakly bound Cd (carbonate bound, humic acid bound, iron and manganese oxide bound) increased significantly, and the proportions of strongly bound Cd (strong organic bound, silicate residual state) also increased to a certain extent. In general, hydrated lime and calcite greatly reduced exchangeable Cd, biochar had an intermediate effect, and montmorillonite and zeolite had the minimal effects on exchangeable Cd. Considering the effects of these treatments on the soil pH and Cd passivation efficiency, 3% calcite is the best passivating agent for weakly acidic Cd-contaminated soil under laboratory culture test conditions. As a natural non-metallic mineral, calcite showed efficient passivation, and it is cheap, easy to obtain and environmentally friendly, suggesting its potential for in-situ remediation of weakly acidic Cd contaminated soil.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回