不同方式秸秆还田条件下土壤对Cd2+的吸附性能及固定机制研究

The Effect of Different Ways and Amount of Straw Returning on Cd Sorption for Different Soils.

  • 摘要: 秸秆还田作为广泛推行的农业废弃物资源化利用措施,不仅能培肥地力,增加作物产量,还能固碳减排,修复农田重金属污染。为进一步探明秸秆还田对土壤吸附固定重金属的影响,选择我国黑土(BS)、水稻土(PS)、砖红壤(LS)和红壤(RS)4种典型土壤,开展吸附等温试验,考察粉碎处理(S)、焚烧处理(D)和发酵处理(F)等秸秆还田方式下4种土壤对Cd2+的吸附性能及固定作用。Langmuir拟合结果显示所用土壤对Cd2+吸附量由大到小依次为黑土(4 703~10 598 mg·kg-1)、水稻土(2 804~4 100 mg·kg-1)和砖红壤(2 387~3 906 mg·kg-1);Freundlich拟合参数n值由小到大依次为砖红壤(0.13~0.19)、水稻土(0.28~0.43)、黑土(0.27~0.65)和红壤(0.91~2.74),这表明砖红壤、水稻土、黑土和红壤对Cd2+的亲和力逐渐减弱。不同秸秆还田方式中,就黑土而言,不添加秸秆的对照组Cd2+吸附量最高,为10 598 mg·kg-1;就水稻土和砖红壤而言,秸秆焚烧处理Cd2+吸附量(3 109~4 100 mg·kg-1)高于其他秸秆处理(2 387~3 290 mg·kg-1)和对照组(2 444~2 872 mg·kg-1)。就黑土而言,秸秆焚烧处理Cd2+吸附能(-6.40~-5.01 kJ·mol-1)最小;就水稻土、砖红壤和红壤而言,秸秆焚烧处理Cd2+吸附能(-16.67~-3.13 kJ·mol-1)>对照(-10.54~-2.35 kJ·mol-1)>其他秸秆处理(-10.66~-2.17 kJ·mol-1)。由于灰分中含有无机矿物成分且能增加土壤pH,秸秆焚烧处理可以显著增加土壤对重金属的吸附量和亲和力。针对4种供试土壤,粉碎处理、焚烧处理和发酵处理秸秆还田方式均不适合黑土,比较适合有机质含量较低的土壤。添加焚烧处理秸秆可以有效增加土壤对Cd2+的固定量和亲和力。

     

    Abstract: Straw return, as one of the measures to utilize the agricultural byproduct worldwide, can not only improve soil fertility and crop yield, but also sequestrate carbon emission and remediate soil heavy metal contamination. To further explore the influence of straw return on the sorption of heavy metals by soils and make a foundation for the remediation of soil heavy metal pollution with straw return, four typical soilsblack soil (BS), paddy soil (PS), latosol (LS), and red soil (RS) were selected to conduct isothermal adsorption experiment to investigate the influence of different ways of straw return on Cd2+ adsorption by soils, including crushed straw, burned straw, and fermented straw. In this study, the Langmuir fitting results indicate that the adsorption capacity of Cd2+ by soils was in the order of black soil (4 703-10 598 mg·kg-1) > paddy soil (2 804-4 100 mg·kg-1) > latosol (2 387-3 906 mg·kg-1). The n value of Freundlich fitting results show an ascending order of latosol (0.13-0.19) < paddy soil (0.28-0.43) < black soil (0.27-0.65) < red soil (0.91-2.74), indicating that the affinity of Cd2+ to four soils gradually decreased. For three different ways of straw return, the adsorption capacity for control (i. e., without addition of straw) was the highest, 10 598 mg·kg-1, on black soil. For paddy soil and latosol, the addition of burned straw significantly increased the adsorption capacity (3 109-4 100 mg·kg-1), compared with the addition of other straws (2 387-3 290 mg·kg-1) and controls (2 444-2 872 mg·kg-1). Similarly, the adsorption energy of the addition of burned straw was the minimum (-6.40--5.01 kJ·mol-1) on black soil. On the contrary, for paddy soil, latosol and red soil, the adsorption energy was in the following order with the addition of different ways of straw returning, burned straw (-16.67--3.13 kJ·mol-1) > control (-10.54--2.35 kJ·mol-1) > other straws (-10.66--2.17 kJ·mol-1). The addition of burned straw significantly increased pH in favor of heavy metal adsorption. Besides, the inorganic mineral composition in ash played an important role in Cd2+ adsorption. For tested soils, straw returning is not suitable for black soil with high content of organic matter, but more suitable for soil with low content of organic matter. Generally speaking, on the same type soil, burned straw ash has positive significance on the adsorption capacity and affinity of Cd2+ to soils.

     

/

返回文章
返回