《生物多样性公约》国家报告的演进及其启示

Evolution and Enlightenment of National Reports to the Convention on Biological Diversity

  • 摘要: 《生物多样性公约》(以下简称《公约》)国家报告是推动缔约方履行《公约》并追踪生物多样性保护成效的核心工具。自1995年通过首份国家报告标准格式以来, 经过缔约方大会多次修订完善, 《公约》国家报告发生了深刻变化。本文基于《公约》缔约方大会相关决议、历次国家报告模板及相关指标体系, 系统梳理国家报告在目的、内容、形式、评估要求和提交方式五个方面的转型轨迹, 分析历次全球生物多样性目标配套评估指标体系的发展历程与特点。研究表明, 国家报告呈现结果导向、标准化、定量化的鲜明趋势, 同时也折射出评估需求与执行能力之间的持续博弈与平衡。当前, 国家报告编制工作仍面临数据基础薄弱、指标延续性不足与方法论障碍、缔约方能力有限等现实问题, 制约了国家报告编制效率与质量的提升。面向未来, 建议发挥国际公开数据支撑作用, 推动建立联合调查监测平台, 加大调查监测项目支持, 夯实数据基础; 提升指标体系的延续性, 完善方法学基础, 强化指标应用成效评估, 进一步优化指标体系; 动员多渠道资金予以支持, 强化培训与技术指导, 推进国家层面的部门协同及工作团队建设, 缓解缔约方面临的能力困境。

     

    Abstract: The national report of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) is the core instrument for promoting Parties' implementation of the Convention and tracking the effectiveness of biodiversity governance. Since the adoption of the standard format for the first national report in 1995, the national report has undergone profound changes through continuous revisions by the Conference of the Parties (COP). Based on relevant COP decisions, national report templates and associated indicator frameworks, this paper systematically reviews the transformation of national reports in five aspects: purpose, content, format, assessment requirements and submission modalities. It further analyzes the evolutionary process and characteristics of the indicator frameworks developed for the global biodiversity targets. The research reveals that the national reports present distinct trends towards result-orientation, standardization and quantification, while reflecting the trade-offs and balance between assessment needs and implementation capacities. At present, the preparation of national reports still faces practical challenges, including weak data foundations, insufficient continuity and methodological barriers of indicators, and limited capacity of Parties, which constrain the improvement of the efficiency and quality of national reports. Looking ahead, it is recommended to leverage international open data resources, promote the establishment of joint investigation and monitoring platforms, and scale up the support for investigation and monitoring projects to consolidate data foundations; strengthen the continuity of indicators, improve methodological bases, and enhance the assessment of indicator application effectiveness to further optimize the indicator framework; mobilize multi-source financial support, strengthen training and technical guidance, and promote inter-departmental coordination and working team building at the national level to mitigate capacity constraints for Parties.

     

/

返回文章
返回