宜兴典型村落不同下垫面降雨径流污染物排放特征

doi:10.11934/j.issn.1673-4831.2016.04.018

生态与农村环境学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 632-638.doi: 10.11934/j.issn.1673-4831.2016.04.018

宜兴典型村落不同下垫面降雨径流污染物排放特征

汪楚乔, 陈柔君, 吴磊, 宋海亮, 范忠保, 刘秋菊, 李先宁

东南大学能源与环境学院, 江苏南京 210096

收稿日期:2015-06-11 出版日期:2016-07-25 发布日期:2016-07-26
通讯作者: 李先宁 E-mail:lxn@seu.edu.cn E-mail:lxn@seu.edu.cn
作者简介:汪楚乔(1988-),男,江西九江人,博士生,主要研究方向为水处理技术与生物质厌氧发酵技术。E-mail:wangchuqiao1988@126.com
基金资助:
国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项（2012ZX07101-005）；国家科技支撑计划（2013BAJ10B12-02）

Release of Pollutants With Rainfall-Triggered Runoff From Different Underlying Surfaces in Villages Typical of Yixing

WANG Chu-qiao, CHEN Rou-jun, WU Lei, SONG Hai-liang, FAN Zhong-bao, LIU Qiu-ju, LI Xian-ning

School of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China

Received:2015-06-11 Online:2016-07-25 Published:2016-07-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

选取太湖沿岸宜兴市农村自然村落为研究对象，对研究区域降雨量和4种不同下垫面（屋面、庭院、道路和自留地）降雨径流中污染物进行监测，通过计算污染物的事件平均浓度（EMC），探讨了在天然降雨和人工模拟降雨条件下4种下垫面径流污染物的排放特征及影响因素。结果表明，4种下垫面的降雨径流污染都较严重，若直接排入受纳水体会造成严重污染。包含天然降雨和模拟降雨的综合降雨事件中4种下垫面径流中COD、SS、TN和TP的EMC均值分别为52.77～133.94、55.02～935.65、2.20～8.59和0.066～2.96 mg·L^-1，其中，自留地的各项污染指标均最大。降雨量和降雨强度是影响村落地表径流中COD和SS浓度的重要因素。前期晴天时间与庭院、道路和自留地下垫面径流中污染物EMC之间呈正相关，而与屋面径流中污染物EMC之间相关性不明显。

关键词: 村落, 降雨径流, 排放特征, 降雨特征, 下垫面

Abstract:

Natural villages on the shore of the Taihu Lake in Yixing were selected as objects in the study. Rainfall and pollutants in the rainfall-triggered runoff from 4 different types of underlying surface (roof, courtyard, road and private plot) were monitored and event mean concentrations (EMC) of the pollutants were calculated so as to explore characteristics of the release of pollutants with runoff from different types of underlying surface under natural rainfalls and simulated rainfalls and their affecting factors. Results show that the runoffs were seriously polluted regardless of type of underlying surface, and direct discharge of the runoff into receptor waterbodies would cause serious environment pollution. EMC of COD, SS, TN and TP in the runoff from 4 different types of underlying surface after each natural and simulated rainfall event varied in the range of 52.77-133.94, 55.02-935.65, 2.20-8.59 and 0.066-2.96 mg·L^-1, respectively. Among 4 types of interlying surface, private plot was the highest in all the pollution indices. Rainfall and rainfall intensity were the two important factors affecting COD and SS concentrations in the rural runoff, EMCs of the pollutants in runoffs from courtyard, road and private plot, were positively related to the number of sunny days prior to the start of rainfall events, but EMCs of the pollutants in runoffs from roof were not significantly related.

Key words: rural, rainfall-triggered runoff, discharge characteristics, rainfall characteristics, underlying surface

中图分类号:

汪楚乔, 陈柔君, 吴磊, 宋海亮, 范忠保, 刘秋菊, 李先宁. 宜兴典型村落不同下垫面降雨径流污染物排放特征[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(4): 632-638.

WANG Chu-qiao, CHEN Rou-jun, WU Lei, SONG Hai-liang, FAN Zhong-bao, LIU Qiu-ju, LI Xian-ning. Release of Pollutants With Rainfall-Triggered Runoff From Different Underlying Surfaces in Villages Typical of Yixing[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2016, 32(4): 632-638.

参考文献

[1] 吕锡武.小型分散式农村生活污水生物生态组合工艺除磷脱氮的理论与实践[J].环境科技,2012,24(1):24.
[2] 王子臣,邱丹,堵燕钰,等.太湖流域典型菜地地表径流及氮磷流失特征[J].江苏农业学报,2012,28(6):1501-1504.
[3] 李青云.北京典型村镇降雨径流水文、水质及污染特性的研究[D].北京:北京交通大学,2011.
[4] 任玉芬,王效科,韩冰,等.城市不同下垫面的降雨径流污染[J].生态学报,2005,25(12):3225-3230.
[5] 苏保林,李卉,张磊,等.太滆运河流域葡萄园径流污染规律分析[J].生态与农村环境学报,2011,27(6):32-36.
[6] 刘平,程炯,刘晓南,等.广州流溪河流域典型农业集水区降雨径流污染物输出特征分析[J].生态与农村环境学报,2008,24(1):92-95.
[7] 马振坤.太湖流域水量水质实时监测决策支持系统模型研究及应用[D].南京:河海大学,2007.
[8] 王文欣,庄义琳,庄家尧,等.不同降雨强度下坡地覆盖对土壤有机碳流失的影响[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(4):62-66.
[9] 林原,袁宏林,陈海清.西安市屋面、路面雨水水质特征分析[J].科技风,2011,1(6):128-133.
[10] 陈伟伟,张会敏,黄福贵,等.城区屋面雨水径流水文水质特征研究[J].水资源与水工程学报,2011,22(3):86-88.
[11] 国家环境保护总局《水和废水监测分析方法》编委会.水和废水监测分析方法[M].4版.北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002:243-557.
[12] 胡晓东,翁松干,李志清.典型农用地降雨径流污染物输出特征[J].长江科学院院报,2015,32(2):20-23.
[13] GB 3838-2002,地表水环境质量标准[S].
[14] 欧阳威,王玮,郝芳华,等.北京城区不同下垫面降雨径流产污特征分析[J].中国环境科学,2010,30(9):1249-1256.
[15] DUZGOREN-AYDIN N S.Sources and Characteristics of Lead Pollution in the Urban Environment of Guangzhou[J].Science of the Total Environment,2007,385(1/2/3):182-195.
[16] CHIEW F,MCMAHON T A.Modelling Runoff and Diffuse Pollution Loads in Urban Areas[J].Water Science and Technology,1999,39(12):241-248.
[17] 李立青,尹澄清,孔玲莉,等.2次降雨间隔时间对城市地表径流污染负荷的影响[J].环境科学,2007,28(10):2287-2293.
[18] 罗专溪,朱波,王振华,等.川中丘陵区村镇降雨特征与径流污染物的相关关系[J].中国环境科学,2008,28(11):1032-1036.

宜兴典型村落不同下垫面降雨径流污染物排放特征

Release of Pollutants With Rainfall-Triggered Runoff From Different Underlying Surfaces in Villages Typical of Yixing

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	柳强, 王康, 罗彬, 陈鹏, 杨渊, 陈玲玲. 基于SWAT模型的涪江流域下垫面对面源污染负荷的影响分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(6): 722-729.
[2]	张晓勇, 张金池, 俞美香, 李海东. 煤中汞在电厂烟气中的排放特征[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(2): 229-234.
[3]	苏保林, 李卉, 张磊, 王寅, 付杰, 张丽君, 张倩. 太滆运河流域葡萄园径流污染规律分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2011, 27(6): 32-36.
[4]	刘洪鹄, 刘宪春, 赵晓辉. 东北漫岗区村落的分布特征分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2006, 22(1): 15-19.
[5]	沈茂英, 陈国阶. 岷江上游典型村落资源利用与影响动因分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2005, 21(1): 58-61.
[6]	王智平. 村落生态系统分布特征和模式的探讨[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 1994, 10(1): 6-8.
[7]	王智平. 不同地貌类型区自然村落生态系统的比较分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 1993, 9(2): 11-15,66.