生态与农村环境学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 448-455.doi: 10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2020.0689

• 区域环境与发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

秦巴山区农户生计与乡村发展耦合协调分析:以陕西省洛南县为例

杨悦1, 员学锋1, 马超群1, 徐和平2, 任朝霞1   

  1. 1. 长安大学土地工程学院, 陕西 西安 710064;
    2. 长安大学经济管理学院, 陕西 西安 710064
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-20 出版日期:2021-04-25 发布日期:2021-04-25
  • 通讯作者: 员学锋 E-mail:zyxfyun@chd.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:杨悦(1996-),女,山西晋城人,研究方向为土地利用与乡村发展。E-mail:872458049@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    长安大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项(300102270207)

Coupling Coordination Analysis of Farmers' Livelihoods and Rural Development in the Qinling-Daba Mountains: A Case Study of Luonan County in Shaanxi Province

YANG Yue1, YUAN Xue-feng1, MA Chao-qun1, XU He-ping2, REN Zhao-xia1   

  1. 1. School of Land Engineering, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China;
    2. School of Economics and Management, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China
  • Received:2020-08-20 Online:2021-04-25 Published:2021-04-25

摘要: 准确把握农户生计状况与乡村发展水平的耦合协调关系,对于解决"三农"问题、促进区域可持续发展具有十分重要的意义。基于英国国际发展部提出的可持续生计框架选取测度指标计算了陕西省洛南县626户农户的生计资本值,并对农户所在的村庄发展水平进行测度,通过耦合协调度模型对两者间的关系进行了分析研究。结果表明:洛南县农户的生计资本均值为0.171 4,整体水平偏低,各单项资本中社会资本和物质资本水平相对较高,自然资本水平居中,人力资本和金融资本水平处于较低水平;洛南县乡村发展水平的平均值为0.354 2,发展水平较低,特别是乡村性较弱的乡村在产业发展、人居环境以及资源禀赋方面仍有较大的提升空间;绝大多数样本村农户的生计状况明显滞后于乡村发展水平,农户生计水平亟需提升。基于此,针对农户生计与乡村发展的协调发展类型提出相关建议:对于农户生计状况滞后于乡村发展的村落,建议通过推动乡村现代化农业的发展、人居环境的改善、基础设施和公共服务设施的完善,提高农户的生计资本值;对于农户生计水平与乡村发展同步但两者仍处于磨合阶段的村庄,可通过改变原有的产业发展模式、改善产业发展条件的方式吸纳更多的劳动力回流,以促进两者的协调发展。

关键词: 生计资本, 乡村发展, 耦合协调

Abstract: Accurately grasping the coupling coordination relationship between farmers' livelihoods and rural development is of great significance for solving issues affecting farmers, agriculture, and rural areas, and promoting sustainable regional development. The livelihood capital status of 626 rural households in Luonan County, Shaanxi Province was calculated based on the sustainable livelihood framework proposed by the United Kingdom Department for International Development, and the development level of the villages in which the farmers are located was measured. Then, the relationship between farmers' livelihoods and rural development was studied using a coupling coordination model. The results are as follows: (1) The average livelihood capital level of the rural households in Luonan County was 0.171 4, which is relatively low. Within the overall level, the levels of social and physical capital were the highest, followed by natural capital, with levels of human and financial capital being the lowest. (2) Luonan County's average rural development level was 0.354 2, which again is relatively low. Especially in the less developed rural villages, there is significant room for improving the industrial development, human settlements, and resource endowments. (3) The level of farmers' livelihoods is lower than the level of rural development in most sample villages, and the livelihood levels of farmers need to be improved. On the basis of the findings, suggestions are made for the coordinated development of farmers' livelihoods and rural development. When farmers' livelihoods lag behind rural development, it is important to promote the development of modern agriculture and to improve living conditions, infrastructure, and public service facilities in rural areas to increase the value of the livelihood capital of the farmers. In villages where farmers' livelihoods are synchronized with rural development, but both remain in early developmental stages, more labor can be absorbed by changing the original model of industrial development and improving industrial development conditions to promote the coordinated development of both livelihoods and rural development.

Key words: livelihood capital, rural development, coupling and coordination

中图分类号: