稻秸干式厌氧发酵气-肥联产潜力研究

doi:10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2021.0114

生态与农村环境学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 266-272.doi: 10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2021.0114

• 污染控制与修复 • 上一篇

稻秸干式厌氧发酵气-肥联产潜力研究

王晨^1,2, 王振旗², 张敏², 沈根祥^1,2, 张心良², 钱晓雍², 高宗源^1,2

1. 华东理工大学资源与环境工程学院, 上海 200237;
2. 上海市环境科学研究院国家环境保护新型污染物环境健康影响评价重点实验室, 上海 200233

收稿日期:2021-02-26 出版日期:2022-02-25 发布日期:2022-02-24
通讯作者: 沈根祥,E-mail:shengx@saes.sh.cn E-mail:shengx@saes.sh.cn
作者简介:王晨(1999-),女,安徽淮北人,主要研究方向为农业废弃物处理利用。E-mail:wang19892966@163.com
基金资助:
上海市科委"科技创新行动计划"项目（19DZ1204801）；上海市重大环保科研项目（沪环科[2015]第8号，沪环科[2020]第10号）

Study on the Potential of Rice Straw Dry Anaerobic Fermentation with Biogas and Fertilizer

WANG Chen^1,2, WANG Zhen-qi², ZHANG Min², SHEN Gen-xiang^1,2, ZHANG Xin-liang², QIAN Xiao-yong², GAO Zong-yuan^1,2

1. School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China;
2. State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Environmental Health Impact Assessment of Emerging Contaminants, Shanghai Academy of Environmental Sciences, Shanghai 200233, China

Received:2021-02-26 Online:2022-02-25 Published:2022-02-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对水源区稻秸长期还田引发的农业生产问题和环境风险，以及本地有机肥供应短缺问题，采用一体化不锈钢发酵罐，通过观测猪粪添加条件下稻秸干式厌氧发酵（含固率为20%）的产气特征和沼渣特性，探讨了高C/N比下稻秸气-肥联产潜力。结果显示，当反应体系C/N比升至50（C3组）时，日产气量最高为4.7 L·d^-1，w（甲烷）达50%以上所需时间为12 d，单位干物质产气量为294 L·kg^-1，仅比C/N比为30的最优组（C6组）下降了11.2%，说明稻秸干式厌氧发酵系统运行C/N比上限可设置为50；此外，稻秸干式厌氧发酵处理后C/N比为30~50的处理组（C3~C6）中纤维素可大幅降解，虽脱水沼渣总养分含量仅有2.25%~3.71%，但有机质含量、pH值和重金属含量均符合我国农业行业中NY/T 525-2021《有机肥料》标准要求，具备高品质有机肥料产品的生产潜力；经模拟工程测算，处理12 t·d^-1的秸秆年收益可达78.16万元，较现行的直接还田利用模式经济收益显著提高，说明水源区稻秸干式厌氧发酵气-肥联产具有可行性。

关键词: 水源区, 水稻秸秆, 共消化, 干式厌氧发酵, 制肥潜力

Abstract: To solve the long existing obstacles of following season growth and other environmental risks caused by rice straw returning to the field, as well as the issue of local organic fertilizer supply deficit in water resource area, a series of batch tests on an integrated stainless-steel anaerobic digester (with total solids of 20%) were conducted. The characteristics of both biogas and residue production from the studied dry anaerobic digestion (AD) system with limited pig manure (PM) input (as nitrogen source) were investigated, to explore the biogas and digestate productivity from AD systems with high C/N ratio. Results show that the maximum gas yield was 4.7 L·d^-1 when C/N ratio reached 50∶1 (group C3). On the 12th day, the methane content in C3 group reached to 50% and biogas yield reached to 294 L·kg^-1, which were only 11.2% lower than the optimal group C6 (with C/N of 30∶1). It indicates that the upper limit of feedstock C/N ratio in dry AD system could be set at 50∶1. Moreover, the cellulose in C3~C6 (with C/N ratio of 50∶1~30∶1) could also be significantly degraded after digestion processes. The total nutrient in the dehydrated digestate of different treatments (C3~C6) was only around 2.25% to 3.71%, but other criteria such as organic matter content, pH value and heavy metal contents could all meet the organic fertilizer standards NY/T 525-2021 in agricultural industry, thus could be processed to high-quality organic fertilizer products. Based on engineering process simulation, when rice straw was processed at a rate of 12 t·d^-1, the annual profit of the studied system was 781 600 yuan, which is significantly higher than the profit of direct returning of straw to field. Therefore, it's considered both economically and environmentally feasible to apply biogas and fertilizer co-production from rice straw-based dry AD in water resource area.

Key words: water resource area, rice straw, co-digestion, dry anaerobic digestion, fertilizer potential

中图分类号:

X713

王晨, 王振旗, 张敏, 沈根祥, 张心良, 钱晓雍, 高宗源. 稻秸干式厌氧发酵气-肥联产潜力研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2022, 38(2): 266-272.

WANG Chen, WANG Zhen-qi, ZHANG Min, SHEN Gen-xiang, ZHANG Xin-liang, QIAN Xiao-yong, GAO Zong-yuan. Study on the Potential of Rice Straw Dry Anaerobic Fermentation with Biogas and Fertilizer[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2022, 38(2): 266-272.

参考文献

[1] 严铠, 刘仲妮, 成鹏远, 等.中国农业废弃物资源化利用现状及展望[J].农业展望, 2019, 15(7):62-65.[YAN Kai, LIU Zhong-ni, CHENG Peng-yuan, et al.Status Quo of Agricultural Waste Resource Utilization in China and its Prospects[J].Agricultural Outlook, 2019, 15(7):62-65.]
[2] SUN M, XU X, WANG C, et al.Environmental Burdens of the Comprehensive Utilization of Straw:Wheat Straw Utilization from a Life-cycle Perspective[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 259:120702.
[3] 李欣, 周知戬, 谭祎琦.农业废弃物资源化利用现状及对策分析:以秸秆、稻壳、畜禽粪便为例[J].现代农业研究, 2020, 26(5):125-126.[LI Xin, ZHOU Zhi-jian, TAN Yi-qi.Utilization Status and Countermeasures of Agricultural Waste Resource:Taking Straw, Rice Husk and Animal Manure as Examples[J].Modern Agriculture Research, 2020, 26(5):125-126.
[4] CHU X Q, WU G X, WANG J Q, et al.Dry Co-digestion of Sewage Sludge and Rice Straw under Mesophilic and Thermophilic Anaerobic Conditions[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2015, 22(24):20143-20153.
[5] MOMAYEZ F, KARIMI K, TAHERZADEH M J.Energy Recovery from Industrial Crop Wastes by Dry Anaerobic Digestion:A Review[J].Industrial Crops and Products, 2019, 129:673-687.
[6] LI Y, LI L H, SUN Y, et al.Bioaugmentation Strategy for Enhancing Anaerobic Digestion of High C/N Ratio Feedstock with Methanogenic Enrichment Culture[J].Bioresource Technology, 2018, 261:188-195.
[7] 李玉春, 陈广银, 常志州, 等.碳氮比对稻秸厌氧发酵过程的影响[J].中国沼气, 2012, 30(4):25-29.[LI Yu-chun, CHEN Guang-yin, CHANG Zhi-zhou, et al.Effect of C/N on Anaerobic Digestion of Rice Straw[J].China Biogas, 2012, 30(4):25-29.]
[8] JUGAL S M, VENKATESWARA R P.Synergistic Effect in Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Rice Straw and Dairy Manure-a Batch Kinetic Study[J].Energy Sources, Part A:Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 2019, 41(17):2145-2156.
[9] GONG H, LIU M, LI K, et al.Optimizing Dry Anaerobic Digestion at Pilot Scale for Start-up Strategy and Long-Term Operation:Organic Loading Rate, Temperature and Co-Digestion[J].Bioresource Technology, 2020, 316:123828.
[10] ABOUELENIEN F, NAMBA Y, NISHIO N, et al.Dry Co-Digestion of Poultry Manure with Agriculture Wastes[J].Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2016, 178(5):932-946.
[11] FENG J Y, LI Y Q, ZHANG E L, et al.Solid-State Co-Digestion of NaOH-Pretreated Corn Straw and Chicken Manure under Mesophilic Condition[J].Waste and Biomass Valorization, 2018, 9(6):1027-1035.
[12] 王振旗, 张敏, 沈根祥, 等.不同黄贮预处理对水稻秸秆干法厌氧发酵特性的影响[J].农业环境科学学报, 2021, 40(4):894-901.[WANG Zhen-qi, ZHANG Min, SHEN Gen-xiang, et al.Effects of Different Yellow-Storage Pretreatments on the Dry Anaerobic Digestion Characteristics of Rice Straw[J].Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2021, 40(4):894-901.]
[13] 国家环境保护总局《水和废水监测分析方法》编委会.水和废水监测分析方法[M].4版.北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2002:120.
[14] 薛惠琴, 杭怡琼, 陈谊.稻草秸秆中木质素、纤维素测定方法的研讨[J].上海畜牧兽医通讯, 2001(2):15.[XUE Hui-qin, HANG Yi-qiong, CHEN Yi.Study on the Determination Method of Lignin and Cellulose in Rice Straw[J].Shanghai Journal of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2001(2):15.]
[15] MACIAS-CORRAL M, SAMANI Z, HANSON A, et al.Anaerobic Digestion of Municipal Solid Waste and Agricultural Waste and the Effect of Co-digestion with Dairy Cow Manure[J].Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99(17):8288-8293.
[16] LI D, LIU S C, MI L, et al.Effects of Feedstock Ratio and Organic Loading Rate on the Anaerobic Mesophilic Co-digestion of Rice Straw and Pig Manure[J].Bioresource Technology, 2015, 187:120-127.
[17] HOU T T, ZHAO J M, LEI Z F, et al.Synergistic Effects of Rice Straw and Rice Bran on Enhanced Methane Production and Process Stability of Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste[J].Bioresource Technology, 2020, 314:123775.
[18] 张望, 李秀金, 庞云芝, 等.稻草中温干式厌氧发酵产甲烷的中试研究[J].农业环境科学学报, 2008, 27(5):2075-2079.[ZHANG Wang, LI Xiu-jin, PANG Yun-zhi, et al.A Pilot Study on Mesophilic Dry Anaerobic Digestion of Rice Straw[J].Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2008, 27(5):2075-2079.]
[19] ZHANG W M, YU C X, WANG X J, et al.Increased Abundance of Nitrogen Transforming Bacteria by Higher C/N Ratio Reduces the Total Losses of N and C in Chicken Manure and Corn Stover Mix Composting[J].Bioresource Technology, 2020, 297:122410.
[20] 杨立, 张婷, 王永泽, 等.不同秸秆厌氧发酵产沼气效果的比较[J].可再生能源, 2008, 26(5):46-48.[YANG Li, ZHANG Ting, WANG Yong-ze, et al.Comparison on the Biogas Production Effect of Different Stalks Anaerobic Fermentation[J].Renewable Energy Resources, 2008, 26(5):46-48.]
[21] LIU T, ZHOU X Q, LI Z F, et al.Effects of Liquid Digestate Pretreatment on Biogas Production for Anaerobic Digestion of Wheat Straw[J].Bioresource Technology, 2019, 280:345-351.
[22] 冯晶, 刘国华, 马继涛, 等.规模化沼气工程集成技术及工程运行效果研究[J].农业工程学报, 2018, 34(增刊1):81-85.[FENG Jing, LIU Guo-hua, MA Ji-tao, et al.Study on Integrated Technology of Large Scale Straw Biogas and Plant and its Operation Effect[J].Transaction of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34(Suppl. 1):81-85.]
[23] YANG G X, LI Y, ZHEN F, et al.Biochemical Methane Potential Prediction for Mixed Feedstocks of Straw and Manure in Anaerobic Co-digestion[J].Bioresource Technology, 2021, 326:124745.
[24] 李勇德, 郑桂永.浅谈兰山区"长三角"畜产品供应基地建设[J].山东畜牧兽医, 2020, 41(12):48-49.
[25] 秦凯, 陈芳清, 张行, 等.碳氮比对模拟水稻秸秆田间厌氧发酵系统甲烷生产和秸秆降解的影响[J].生物资源, 2020, 42(3):342-348.[QIN Kai, CHEN Fang-qing, ZHANG Hang, et al.Effects of Carbon Nitrogen Ratio on Methane Production and Straw Degradation in a Simulated Field Anaerobic Fermentation System of Rice Straw[J].Biotic Resources, 2020, 42(3):342-348.]
[26] ZHU Q H, LI X G, LI G W, et al.Enhanced Bioenergy Production in Rural Areas:Synthetic Urine as a Pre-Treatment for Dry Anaerobic Fermentation of Wheat Straw[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 260:121164.
[27] 兰时乐, 曹杏芝, 戴小阳, 等.鸡粪与油菜秸秆高温堆肥中营养元素变化的研究[J].农业环境科学学报, 2009, 28(3):564-569.[LAN Shi-le, CAO Xing-zhi, DAI Xiao-yang, et al.The Changes of Nutrition Elements during the Composting Chicken Manure and Rape Straw under Higher Temperature[J].Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2009, 28(3):564-569.]
[28] 王菲, 王顺利, 刘克锋, 等.不同碳氮比对牛粪秸秆干法厌氧发酵产气及肥效的影响[J].北京农学院学报, 2015, 30(3):62-66.[WANG Fei, WANG Shun-li, LIU Ke-feng, et al.Effect of Different Carbon-Nitrogen Ratios on the Biogas Production and Fertilizer Efficiency of Cow Manure and Straw through Dry Anaerobic Fermentation[J].Journal of Beijing University of Agriculture, 2015, 30(3):62-66.]
[29] GUILAYN F, ROUEZ M, CREST M, et al.Valorization of Digestates from Urban or Centralized Biogas Plants:A Critical Review[J].Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio-Technology, 2020, 19(2):419-462.
[30] 周运来, 张振华, 范如芹, 等.小麦秸秆不同还田方式下土壤微生物碳代谢多样性特征[J].生态与农村环境学报, 2017, 33(10):913-920.[ZHOU Yun-lai, ZHANG Zhen-hua, FAN Ru-qin, et al.Carbon Metabolism Diversity Characteristics of Soil Microbe Affected by Wheat Straw Incorporation Pattern[J].Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2017, 33(10):913-920.]

稻秸干式厌氧发酵气-肥联产潜力研究

Study on the Potential of Rice Straw Dry Anaerobic Fermentation with Biogas and Fertilizer

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张应鹏, 陈广银, 黑昆仑, 杨一帆, 许彩云, 常志州. 沼液全量连续回流对稻秸厌氧发酵特性的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2017, 33(9): 845-851.
[2]	李敏, 宋吟玲, 党菲, 王玉军, 周东美. 水稻秸秆腐解液对水稻根部吸收纳米银(AgNP)速率的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(4): 675-681.
[3]	杨阳, 张毅敏, 练建军, 段金程, 周创, 林超. 炭化秸秆吸磷剂的制备及其吸附性能研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2013, 29(6): 755-761.
[4]	朱琳, 刘春晓, 王小华, 孙勤芳, 卞新民. 水稻秸秆沟埋还田对麦田土壤环境的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2012, 28(4): 399-403.
[5]	张余霞, 张玲, 张阳阳, 李倩, 陆长梅, 吴国荣, 张卫明. 盐京九号水稻秸秆对铜绿微囊藻(Microcystis aeruginosa)的抑制作用[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2008, 24(3): 60-63.