应用物种敏感性分布评价高铁酸钾对淡水水产养殖生物的生态风险

doi:10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2022.0273

生态与农村环境学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (6): 774-780.doi: 10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2022.0273

应用物种敏感性分布评价高铁酸钾对淡水水产养殖生物的生态风险

曹国庆¹, 殷玉婷¹, 王新池¹, 宋超^1,2,3,4,5, 杜立志⁵, 张建桥⁵

1. 南京农业大学无锡渔业学院, 江苏无锡 214081;
2. 中国水产科学研究院淡水渔业研究中心, 江苏无锡 214081;
3. 农业农村部水产品质量安全环境因子风险评估实验室(无锡), 江苏无锡 214081;
4. 农业农村部水产品质量安全控制重点实验室, 北京 100141;
5. 山东得和生物技术集团有限公司, 河北潍坊 261309

收稿日期:2022-03-31 发布日期:2023-06-19
通讯作者: 宋超,E-mail:songc@ffrc.cn E-mail:songc@ffrc.cn
作者简介:曹国庆(1998-),男,江苏淮安人,主要研究方向为环境毒理学。E-mail:2466880614@qq.com
基金资助:
农业农村部水产品质量安全控制重点实验室开放课题(2021002);中国水产科学研究院淡水渔业研究中心基本科研业务费(2021JBFM18)

Assessing Ecological Risks of Potassium Ferrate to Freshwater Aquaculture Organisms by Species Sensitivity Distribution

CAO Guo-qing¹, YIN Yu-ting¹, WANG Xin-chi¹, SONG Chao^1,2,3,4,5, DU Li-zhi⁵, ZHAN Jian-qiao⁵

1. Wuxi Fishery College, Nanjing Agricultural University, Wuxi 214081, China;
2. Freshwater Fisheries Research Center, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Wuxi 214081, China;
3. Laboratory of Quality & Safety Risk Assessment for Aquatic Products on Environmental Factors(Wuxi), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Wuxi 214081, China;
4. Key Laboratory of Control of Quality and Safety for Aquatic Products, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100141, China;
5. Shandong Dehe Technology Group Ltd., Weifang 261309, China

Received:2022-03-31 Published:2023-06-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 高铁酸钾作为水质改良剂,在水产行业中已经被广泛使用,但高铁酸钾使用的安全性与淡水水产养殖生物基准值一直不明确。利用物种敏感度分布法(species sensitivity distribution, SSD)来推导高铁酸钾淡水水产养殖生物基准值,评价高铁酸钾对淡水水产养殖生物的生态风险,通过急性毒性试验法获取高铁酸钾对14种淡水水生生物的急性毒性值;选取6种拟合模型来拟合毒性数据,通过比较回归系数和残差平方和来确定拟合优度最佳的模型;推导高铁酸钾对不同类生物的5%危害浓度HC₅阈值(hazardous concentration for 5% the species)以及高铁酸钾淡水水产养殖生物及淡水水生生物基准值;结合SSD模型计算高铁酸钾对淡水水产养殖生物的潜在影响比例(potentially affected fraction, PAF)。结果显示,Sigmoid模型拟合优度最佳,高铁酸钾对全部淡水水生生物的安全基准值为6.82 mg·L^-1,对水产养殖生物的安全基准值为9.53 mg·L^-1;日常水产养殖高铁酸钾使用的浓度值所对应PAF值为0,生态风险低。研究结果可为高铁酸钾淡水水产养殖生物基准值制定以及安全使用提供科学依据以及理论指导。

关键词: 高铁酸钾, 水质基准, 物种敏感度分布法, 急性毒性试验

Abstract: Potassium ferrate has been widely used as a water quality improver in aquatic industry, but the safety of its use and the reference value of freshwater aquaculture organisms have been unclear. In this study, the species sensitivity distribution (SSD) method was used to determine the reference value of potassium ferrate and evaluate the ecological risk of potassium ferrate to freshwater aquaculture organisms. The acute toxicity of potassium ferrate to 14 freshwater aquatic organisms was obtained by acute toxicity test. Six fitting models were selected to fit the toxicity data, and the regression coefficient and residual sum of squares were compared to determine the model with the best goodness of fit. The HC₅ threshold (hazardous concentration for 5% of the species) of potassium ferrate for different species and the reference value of potassium ferrate for freshwater aquaculture organisms and freshwater aquatic organism were derived. The potentially affected fraction (PAF) of potassium ferrate on freshwater aquaculture organisms was calculated by using the SSD model. The results show that: (1) The sigmoid model had the best goodness of fit, and the basic safety value of potassium ferrate for all freshwater aquatic organisms was 6.82 mg·L^-1, and for freshwater aquaculture organisms was 9.53 mg·L^-1. (2) The PAF value corresponding to the concentration value of potassium ferrate used in daily aquaculture is 0, indicating low ecological risk. The results can provide scientific basis and theoretical guidance for the formulation of reference value of potassium ferrate in freshwater aquaculture organisms and the safe use of potassium ferrate.

Key words: potassium ferrate, water quality benchmark, species sensitivity distribution, acute toxicity test

中图分类号:

X826

曹国庆, 殷玉婷, 王新池, 宋超, 杜立志, 张建桥. 应用物种敏感性分布评价高铁酸钾对淡水水产养殖生物的生态风险[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2023, 39(6): 774-780.

CAO Guo-qing, YIN Yu-ting, WANG Xin-chi, SONG Chao, DU Li-zhi, ZHAN Jian-qiao. Assessing Ecological Risks of Potassium Ferrate to Freshwater Aquaculture Organisms by Species Sensitivity Distribution[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2023, 39(6): 774-780.

参考文献

[1] 刘国锋,徐跑,吴霆,等.中国水产养殖环境氮磷污染现状及未来发展思路[J].江苏农业学报,2018,34(1):225-233.[LIU Guo-feng,XU Pao,WU Ting,et al.Present Condition of Aquaculture Nitrogen and Phosphorus Environmental Pollution and Future Development Strategy［J].Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2018,34(1):225-233.］
[2] LAI H T,HOU J H,SU C I,et al.Effects of Chloramphenicol,Florfenicol,and Thiamphenicol on Growth of Algae Chlorella pyrenoidosa,Isochrysis galbana,and Tetraselmis chui[J].Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety,2009,72(2):329-334.
[3] MARINHO-SORIANO E,NUNES S O,CARNEIRO M A A,et al.Nutrients' Removal from Aquaculture Wastewater Using the Macroalgae Gracilaria birdiae[J].Biomass and Bioenergy,2009,33(2):327-331.
[4] WANG J J,BEUSEN A H W,LIU X C,et al.Aquaculture Production is a Large,Spatially Concentrated Source of Nutrients in Chinese Freshwater and Coastal Seas[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2020,54(3):1464-1474.
[5] 胡海彦,狄瑜,宋迁红,等.水产养殖对水生生态系统的影响[J].湖北农业科学,2011,50(7):1426-1429.[HU Hai-yan,DI Yu,SONG Qian-hong,et al.The Effect of Aquaculture on Aquatic Ecology［J].Hubei Agricultural Sciences,2011,50(7):1426-1429.］
[6] 裘丽萍,瞿建宏,吴伟.高铁酸钾在水产养殖中的应用前景[J].现代农业科技,2010(13):344-345,347.[QIU Li-ping,QU Jian-hong,WU Wei.Prospects of Potassium Ferrate(Ⅵ) Application in Aquaculture［J].Modern Agricultural Sciences and Technology,2010(13):344-345,347.］
[7] HU J W,LI Z,ZHANG A,et al.Using a Strong Chemical Oxidant,Potassium Ferrate (K₂FeO₄),in Waste Activated Sludge Treatment:A Review[J].Environmental Research,2020,188:109764.
[8] VIKTOR Z,WANG L,MA J.Promotional Effect of Mn(Ⅱ)/K₂FeO₄ Applying onto Se(Ⅳ) Removal[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2020,384:121264.
[9] 石文锐,董建勋,卫彤,等.高铁酸钾的制备及其在废水治理中的应用进展[J].化学通报,2021,84(3):254-260.[SHI Wen-rui,DONG Jian-xun,WEI Tong,et al.Progress in the Preparation of Potassium Ferrate and Its Application in Wastewater Treatment［J].Chemistry,2021,84(3):254-260.］
[10] GB/T 31270-2014,化学农药环境安全评价试验准则[S].
[11] FOX D R,DAM R A,FISHER R,et al.Recent Developments in Species Sensitivity Distribution Modeling[J].Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry,2021,40(2):293-308.
[12] YIN W,WANG J,NING Q,et al.Assessing Ecological Risks of DDT and Lindane to Freshwater Organisms by Species Sensitivity Distributions [J].Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae,2009,29(11):2407-2414.
[13] ARAMBAWATTA-LEKAMGE S H,PATHIRATNE A,RATHNAYAKE I V N.Sensitivity of Freshwater Organisms to Cadmium and Copper at Tropical Temperature Exposures:Derivation of Tropical Freshwater Ecotoxicity Thresholds Using Species Sensitivity Distribution Analysis[J].Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety,2021,211:111891.
[14] 陈锦灿,方超,郑榕辉,等.应用物种敏感性分布评估微(纳米)塑料对水生生物的生态风险[J].生态毒理学报,2020,15(1):242-255.[CHEN Jin-can,FANG Chao,ZHENG Rong-hui,et al.Assessing Ecological Risks of Micro (Nano) Plastics to Aquatic Organisms Using Species Sensitivity Distributions［J].Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology,2020,15(1):242-255.］
[15] 刘亚莉,谢玉为,张效伟,等.应用物种敏感性分布评价敌敌畏对淡水生物的生态风险[J].生态毒理学报,2016,11(2):531-538.[LIU Ya-li,XIE Yu-wei,ZHANG Xiao-wei,et al.Assessing Ecological Risks of Dichlorvos to Freshwater Organisms by Species Sensitivity Distribution［J].Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology,2016,11(2):531-538.］
[16] 汤嘉骏,刘昕宇,詹志薇,等.流溪河水体有机氯农药的生态风险评价[J].环境科学学报,2014,34(10):2709-2717.[TANG Jia-jun,LIU Xin-yu,ZHAN Zhi-wei,et al.Ecological Risk Assessment of Organochlorine Pesticides OCPs in Water of Liuxi River［J].Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae,2014,34(10):2709-2717.］
[17] HOSE G C,VAN DEN BRINK P J.Confirming the Species-Sensitivity Distribution Concept for Endosulfan Using Laboratory,Mesocosm,and Field Data[J].Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology,2004,47(4):511-520.
[18] 李勖之,郑丽萍,张亚,等.应用物种敏感分布法建立铅的生态安全土壤环境基准研究[J].生态毒理学报,2021,16(1):107-118.[LI Xu-zhi,ZHENG Li-ping,ZHANG Ya,et al.Derivation of Ecological Safety Based Soil Quality Criteria for Lead by Species Sensitivity Distribution［J].Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology,2021,16(1):107-118.］
[19] 董明明,牟力言,秦莉,等.物种敏感性分布法拟合函数的拟合优度评价[J].农业环境科学学报,2021,40(3):544-551.[DONG Ming-ming,MOU Li-yan,QIN Li,et al.Evaluation of the Goodness of Fit of the Species Sensitivity Distribution Fitting Function［J].Journal of Agro-environment Science,2021,40(3):544-551.］
[20] ZHAO J S,CHEN B Y.Species Sensitivity Distribution for Chlorpyrifos to Aquatic Organisms:Model Choice and Sample Size[J].Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety,2016,125:161-169.
[21] 刘良,颜小品,王印,等.应用物种敏感性分布评估多环芳烃对淡水生物的生态风险[J].生态毒理学报,2009,4(5):647-654.[LIU Liang,YAN Xiao-pin,WANG Yin,et al.Assessing Ecological Risks of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)to Freshwater Organisms by Species Sensitivity Distributions［J].Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology,2009,4(5):647-654.］
[22] 高培.壬基酚的水质基准探讨和生态风险评价[D].青岛:中国海洋大学,2014.[GAO Pei.Derivation of Water Quality Criteria for Nonylphenol and Its Application in Ecological Risk Assessment［D].Qingdao:Ocean University of China,2014.］
[23] 裘丽萍,吴伟.水体中高铁酸钾氧化还原电位的动态变化以及对鱼类的毒性研究[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(26):99-104.[QIU Li-ping,WU Wei.The Dynamic Variation of Potassium Ferrite(K₂FeO₄) on Oxidation-reduction Potential (ORP) and Its Toxicology to Fish in Aquatic Environment［J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2012,28(26):99-104.］
[24] 唐启升,韩冬,毛玉泽,等.中国水产养殖种类组成、不投饵率和营养级[J].中国水产科学,2016,23(4):729-758.[TANG Qi-sheng,HAN Dong,MAO Yu-ze,et al.Species Composition,Non-Fed Rate and Trophic Level of Chinese Aquaculture［J].Journal of Fishery Sciences of China,2016,23(4):729-758.］
[25] 王香兰,周军英,王蕾,等.长三角地区毒死蜱水生生物基准研究[J].农药,2013,52(3):181-184.[WANG Xiang-lan,ZHOU Jun-ying,WANG Lei,et al.The Aquatic Organism Criteria for Chlorpyrifos in the Yangtze River Delta Region［J].Agrochemicals,2013,52(3):181-184.］
[26] JENSEN J,SMITH S R,KROGH P H,et al.European Risk Assessment of LAS in Agricultural Soil Revisited:Species Sensitivity Distribution and Risk Estimates[J].Chemosphere,2007,69(6):880-892.
[27] 方楠,孙枭琼,张子晗,等.淡水沉积物中诺氟沙星的生态风险评价与基准推导[J].上海海洋大学学报,2020,29(1):64-73.[FANG Nan, SUN Xiao-qiong, ZHANG Zi-han,et al. Ecological Risk Assessment and Sediment Quality Criteria of Norfloxacin in Freshwater Sediment［J].Journal of Shanghai Ocean University,2020,29(1):64-73.］
[28] 文晨,杨虹,卢学强,等.基于物种敏感性分布法的生态风险评价研究进展[J].安全与环境学报,2017,17(1):353-357.[WEN Chen,YANG Hong,LU Xue-qiang,et al.Research Advances in the Ecological Risk Assessment Based on the Species Sensitivity Distributions［J].Journal of Safety and Environment,2017,17(1):353-357.］
[29] 蒋丹烈,胡霞林,尹大强.应用物种敏感性分布法对太湖沉积物中多环芳烃的生态风险分析[J].生态毒理学报,2011,6(1):60-66.[JIANG Dan-lie,HU Xia-lin,YIN Da-qiang.Ecological Risk Assessment on Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons of Sediment in Taihu Lake Using Species Sensitivity Distributions［J].Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology,2011,6(1):60-66.］
[30] 吴丰昌,孟伟,曹宇静,等.镉的淡水水生生物水质基准研究[J].环境科学研究,2011,24(2):172-184.[WU Feng-chang,MENG Wei,CAO Yu-jing,et al.Derivation of Aquatic Life Water Quality Criteria for Cadmium in Freshwater in China［J].Research of Environmental Sciences,2011,24(2):172-184.］

应用物种敏感性分布评价高铁酸钾对淡水水产养殖生物的生态风险

Assessing Ecological Risks of Potassium Ferrate to Freshwater Aquaculture Organisms by Species Sensitivity Distribution

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李政, 何欢祺, 张天旭, 张秋英, 何丽, 闫振广. 典型底栖生物泥鳅的急性毒性物种敏感性评价[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(3): 392-397.
[2]	郑丽萍,龙涛,邓绍坡,陈樯,林玉锁. 我国氟化物的淡水水生生物基准研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2015, 31(6): 923-927.
[3]	梁霞, 周军英, 李建宏, 王香兰, 宋宁慧, 单正军. 物种敏感度分布法（SSD）在农药水质基准推导中的应用[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2015, 31(3): 398-405.
[4]	陈祖义, 林其禄, 米春云. 杀虫丹对鹌鹑的急性毒性试验[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 1985, 1(4): 42-43.