生态与农村环境学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 379-384.doi: 10.11934/j.issn.1673-4831.2017.04.012

• 研究方法 • 上一篇    

基于鼓励环境效果的环保资金分配方法研究:以江苏省燃煤电厂脱硝项目为例

万寅婧1, 潘铁山1, 李文静2, 唐晓燕2, 王文林2   

  1. 1. 江苏省生态环境评估中心/江苏省排污权登记与交易管理中心, 江苏 南京 210036;
    2. 环境保护部南京环境科学研究所, 江苏 南京 210042
  • 收稿日期:2016-07-25 出版日期:2017-04-25 发布日期:2017-04-01
  • 通讯作者: 王文林,E-mail:wangwenlin_jjl@126.com E-mail:wangwenlin_jjl@126.com
  • 作者简介:万寅婧(1981-),女,江苏常州人,高级工程师,硕士,主要研究方向为环境管理。E-mail:wanyinjing81@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    江苏省环保科研课题(2015061);环保公益性行业科研专项(201509038);中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务专项

Allocation of Environmental Protection Fund Based on Encouragement of Environmental Effects: A Case Study of Coal Denitrification Projects for Coal Burning Power Plants in Jiangsu Province

WAN Yin-jing1, PAN Tie-shan1, LI Wen-jing2, TANG Xiao-yan2, WANG Wen-lin2   

  1. 1. Jiangsu Provincial Ecological Environment Assessment Center/Jiangsu Provincial Management Center for Emissions Registration and Exchange, Nanjing 210036, China;
    2. Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection, Nanjing 210042, China
  • Received:2016-07-25 Online:2017-04-25 Published:2017-04-01

摘要:

以"十二五"期间某年江苏省燃煤电厂脱硝项目为例,开展基于当量法的项目环境效果测算,并以单位投资环境效果值(方法一)和环保投资-环境效果相结合的方式(方法二)作为依据进行环保资金分配,与基于项目投资额的传统资金分配方法(现法)的分配结果比较,并进行合理性分析。结果表明,方法一由于单位投资环境效果值是一个相对量,出现了投资额悬殊的项目补助金额却差距不大这一不合理现象;方法二首先按项目投资规模分组,再以分组投资额进行组间资金初步分配,而后在同一规模组内依据初次分配资金额度,直接按环境效果进行二次分配,体现了环保投资与环境效果兼顾的资金分配理念,项目单位投资额的COD削减量与补助比例相关性较高,表明该方法具有较高的科学性与合理性,可试行应用。

关键词: 当量, 环境效果, 资金分配

Abstract:

A case study was conducted of funds allocation for the coal-denitrification projects of coal burning power plants in Jiangsu Province in a certain year during the "Twelfth Five-Year Plan" period to unfold estimation of environmental effects using the equivalent method, and to compare the allocations of environmental protection funds (EPF) based on environmental effects per unit investment (Method Ⅰ), and combination of investment and effects (Method Ⅱ) with that traditionally based on the amount invested in the project (the present method) for analysis of rationality. Results show that Method Ⅰ, as environment benefit per unit investment is a relative value, would often result in an irrational phenomenon that similar amounts of subsidies are allocated to two projects sharply different in investment size, while Method Ⅱ first sorts the projects into groups in the light of investment size and allocates the funds group by group for the first phase to solve the problem of comparing projects sharply different in investment size, and then among projects in the same group,in the light of their primary fund allocations and direct environmental effects of the projects, separately, which embodies the idea of allocating the environmental protection funds witht both investment size and environmental effects of a project taken into account. The amount of subsidies is closely related to the COD reduction rate per unit of investment of a project. All the findings of the case study demonstrate that Method Ⅱ is very scientific and rational and deserves trial application.

Key words: equivalent, environmental effect, fund allocation

中图分类号: