土地利用方式和施肥管理对黑土物理性质的影响

生态与农村环境学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 599-604.doi:

土地利用方式和施肥管理对黑土物理性质的影响

江恒,邹文秀,韩晓增,杨春葆,郝翔翔,李猛

中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所

收稿日期:2013-02-26 修回日期:2013-05-21 出版日期:2013-09-25 发布日期:2013-09-30
通讯作者: 韩晓增中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所 E-mail:xzhan@neigaehrb.ac.cn
作者简介:江恒（1989-），男，安徽池州人，硕士生，主要从事农田土壤水分方面的研究。E-mail:jianghengkl@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(41101208);国家重点基础研究发展计划(2011CB100506)

Effects of Land Use and Fertilization on Physical Properties of Black Soil

JIANG Heng, ZOU Wen-Xiu, HAN Xiao-Zeng, YANG Chun-Bao, HAO Xiang-Xiang, LI Meng

National Observation Station of Hailun Agroecology System,Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology,Chinese Academy of Sciences

Received:2013-02-26 Revised:2013-05-21 Online:2013-09-25 Published:2013-09-30
Contact: HAN Xiao-Zeng National Observation Station of Hailun Agroecology System,Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology,Chinese Academy of Sciences E-mail:xzhan@neigaehrb.ac.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了探讨东北黑土区土壤水分的调控能力及其影响因素以及土壤水分对降水和不同植被覆盖的响应，以海伦农田生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站内的长期定位试验为基础，利用中子水分仪测定土壤体积含水量，研究裸地、休闲地以及包括单施有机肥、化肥+秸秆还田、单施化肥和不施肥4种处理的农田对耕层土壤物理性质和土壤水分动态。结果表明：与休闲地相比，农田土壤容重增加7.47%，而孔隙度、饱和含水量和田间持水量均呈降低趋势，分别下降2.59、6.04和1.90百分比；肥料的施入尤其是施用有机肥和秸秆还田能够改善土壤的物理性质；裸地土壤的物理性质最差。由于植被耗水量较大，农田和休闲地土壤剖面年平均含水量显著低于裸地，施用化肥和秸秆还田可显著降低农田土壤剖面年平均含水量。各处理剖面内土壤水分变异系数均随土壤深度的增加（0~70 cm深处）而呈先减小后增加趋势。由于植被生长的耗水作用，休闲地和农田土壤水分变化比裸地强烈，秸秆还田加剧了农田土壤水分的变异。土壤储水量的动态变化与降水量之间存在明显相关性，不同土地利用方式和施肥管理对浅层土壤储水量的影响较大，但随着土壤深度的增加，各处理对土壤储水量的影响越来越不明显。

关键词: 黑土, 土壤物理性质, 土壤水分, 动态, 变异系数

Abstract: A long-term field experiment, designed to have 4 treatments, i.e. (1) organic manure only(OM);(2) chemical fertilizer and straw incorporation (NPKS); (3) chemical fertilizer only; and (4) no fertilizer, was carried out at the Hailun Agricultural Ecology Station of Chinese Acadey of Sciences, to explore soil water regulating capacity of black soil in Northeast China and its affecting factors, responses of soil moisture to rainfall and vegetational cover, and effects of the four treatments on physical properties and soil water dynamics in the plough layer of the black soil. In the experiment, a neutron probe was used. Results show that compared to fallow land, farmland increased in bulk density by 7.47%, but decreased in soil total porosity, saturated water content and water holding capacity by 2.59、6.04 and 1.09 percentage points,respectively. Fertilization, especially application of OM and NPKS, improved soil physical properties. Bare land was the worst in soil physical propert.As vegetation consumes much water, farmland and fallow land was significantly lower than bare land in annual mean water content. The treatment of application of chemical fertilizer and straw incorporation significantly lowered annual mean water content. Variation coefficients of soil water content in all the treatments showed a similar trend, i.e. decreasing first and then increasing with soil depth within the 0-70 cm soil layer. As a result of water consumption by vegetation, soil water content changed more sharply in the fallow land and farmland than in the bare land and incorporation of crop straw exaggerated the change. Dynamic variation of soil water storage was significantly related with precipitation, and land use pattern and fertilization management were the two factors affecting soil water storage in the surface soil layer the most, but with increasing soil depth, the effects of the treatments decreased significantly.

Key words: black soil, soil water physical property, dynamics of soil water, variation coefficient

中图分类号:

S154.1

江恒, 邹文秀, 韩晓增, 杨春葆, 郝翔翔, 李猛. 土地利用方式和施肥管理对黑土物理性质的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2013, 29(5): 599-604.

JIANG Heng, ZOU Wen-Xiu, HAN Xiao-Zeng, YANG Chun-Bao, HAO Xiang-Xiang, LI Meng. Effects of Land Use and Fertilization on Physical Properties of Black Soil[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2013, 29(5): 599-604.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: http://www.ere.ac.cn/CN/

http://www.ere.ac.cn/CN/Y2013/V29/I5/599

[1]	黄雨晗, 况欣宇, 曹银贵, 罗古拜, 王舒菲, 杨庚, 白中科. 草原露天矿区复垦地与未损毁地土壤物理性质对比[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(7): 940-946.
[2]	赵原, 李晓鹏, 纪景纯, 邹晓娟, 宣可凡, 王伟鹏, 刘建立. 宇宙射线中子法在土壤水分监测研究中的应用进展[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(5): 545-553.
[3]	赵爽凯, 陈克龙, 吴成永, 毛亚辉. 增温对高寒湿地土壤呼吸动态变化的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(2): 225-233.
[4]	吴丹, 邹长新, 林乃峰, 徐德琳. 长江经济带生态系统宏观结构变化特征分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(6): 499-503.
[5]	关靖云, 瓦哈甫·哈力克, 李啸虎, 程越. 近20 a克里雅绿洲人居环境适宜性时空演变分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(6): 512-520.
[6]	李爽, 詹琪, 任建新, 马会强. 堆肥物以及堆肥物与铁屑联用原位修复硝酸盐污染地下水研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(3): 260-266.
[7]	陈水飞, 李垚, 葛晓敏, 周旭, 王乐, 陈婷婷, 丁晖. 浙江仙居典型中亚热带常绿阔叶林样地的群落特征[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2017, 33(12): 1109-1116.
[8]	吴文铸, 李菊颖, 何健, 陈全博, 单正军. 螺虫乙酯在柑橘中的残留消减动态[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(6): 1003-1007.
[9]	刘雅楠, 李文卓, 魏鹏, 曹梦超, 赵颖, 王蒙岑, 朱国念. 腈菌唑在豇豆及露地土壤中的沉积及消解特性[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(5): 832-836.
[10]	王娟娟, 朱莎, 靳士科, 张琪, 由文辉. 上海市3种森林类型土壤微生物生物量碳和氮的时空格局[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(4): 615-621.
[11]	曹宏磊, 颜廷梅, 乔俊, 朱宁远. 潮土和砂姜黑土中双氰胺的硝化抑制作用比较[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(1): 110-114.
[12]	王志刚,胡云龙,徐伟慧,莫继先,李珊珊,张志,杨志宏 . 邻苯二甲酸二甲酯污染对黑土微生物丰度和多样性的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2015, 31(5): 779-783.
[13]	杨阳, 曹昀, 张素娟. 水分条件对灰化苔草根茎萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2015, 31(2): 180-187.
[14]	郭德杰, 吴华山, 马艳, 常志州. 沼液贮存及田间施用后大肠菌群的消长动态[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2014, 30(6): 806-810.
[15]	李玮, 乔玉强, 陈欢, 杜世州, 赵竹, 曹承富. 秸秆还田配施氮肥对砂姜黑土有机质组分与碳库管理指数的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2014, 30(4): 475-480.