Meta分析固液分离技术对养殖废弃物分离效率及气体排放的影响

doi:10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2022.0665

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 固液分离技术被广泛应用于养殖场畜禽粪污的管理,笔者选取36篇已发表的文章进行了全面的Meta分析,以评估不同分离技术的分离效率及其对气体排放的影响。结果表明,螺旋挤压及离心技术是应用最普遍的2种技术,且离心技术具有更高的分离效率(E_X-SF);粪污各指标分离效率随干物质含量的增加而增加;结合干物质分离效率和去除效率的频率分布特征,将分离技术按效率进行了分类,高效率组中固体组分的鲜重(FM)、干物质(DM)、挥发性固体(VS)、总氮(TN)、总铵态氮(TAN)、总磷(TP)及总钾(TK)含量的分离效率分别是低效率组的2.5、1.9、1.6、3.1、5.2、2.3及3.1倍;固液分离技术显著降低了甲烷(CH₄)(34.4%~67.9%)及温室气体(GHG)(38.9%~60.7%)的排放,且高效率组相较于低效率组具有更高的气体减排潜力。研究对实际生产中预测不同分离技术的效率及环境影响提供了理论依据,并对粪污分离后的安全利用具有重要参考价值。

关键词: 粪污, 固液分离, 分离技术, 分离效率, 去除效率

Abstract: Solid-liquid separation technology is widely used in animal farms to manage slurry. To evaluate the distribution of components in slurry under the application of different solid-liquid separation technologies, 36 published articles were screened for comprehensive meta-analysis. The results of data analysis show that the separation efficiency (E_X-SF) of slurry was positively correlated with dry matter content of raw slurry. Centrifuge and screw press are the two most widely used separation technologies in practical production. With the same dry matter content of raw slurry, the E_X-SF of centrifuge is higher than that of screw press. The efficiencies of different separation technologies are classified according to the removal efficiency and separation efficiency. The E_X-SF of FM, DM, VS, TN, TAN, TP and TK in solids of the high efficiency group are 2.5, 1.9, 1.6, 3.1, 5.2, 2.3 and 3.1 times as high as that of the low efficiency group, respectively. After solid-liquid separation, the CH₄ and GHG emissions of the slurry were significantly reduced by 34.4%-67.9% and 38.9%-60.7%, respectively. The high efficiency group has higher potential of gas emission reduction than the low efficiency group. This study also provides theoretical basis for the prediction of the efficiency and environmental impact of different liquid and solid components separation technologies in storage and field application, which has important reference value for the accurate evaluation and safe utilization of separated slurry in China.

Key words: slurry, solid-liquid separation, separation technology, separation efficiency, removal efficiency

中图分类号:

张新星, 王珊珊, 梁文旭, 文丽青, 张伟涛, 高志岭. Meta分析固液分离技术对养殖废弃物分离效率及气体排放的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2023, 39(12): 1619-1628.

ZHANG Xin-xing, WANG Shan-shan, LIANG Wen-xu, WEN Li-qing, ZHANG Wei-tao, GAO Zhi-ling. Efficiency and Gas Emission Assessment of Various Solid-liquid Separation Technologies for Animal Slurry: A Meta Analysis[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2023, 39(12): 1619-1628.

参考文献

[1] 吴浩玮,孙小淇,梁博文,等.我国畜禽粪便污染现状及处理与资源化利用分析[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2020,39(6):1168-1176.[WU Hao-wei,SUN Xiao-qi,LIANG Bo-wen,et al.Analysis of Livestock and Poultry Manure Pollution in China and Its Treatment and Resource Utilization[J]. Journal of Agro-environment Science,2020,39(6):1168-1176.]
[2] 罗娟,赵立欣,姚宗路,等.规模化养殖场畜禽粪污处理综合评价指标体系构建与应用[J]. 农业工程学报,2020,36(17):182-189.[LUO Juan,ZHAO Li-xin,YAO Zong-lu,et al.Construction and Application of Comprehensive Evaluation Index System for Waste Treatment on Intensive Livestock Farms[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2020,36(17):182-189.]
[3] 仇焕广,廖绍攀,井月,等.我国畜禽粪便污染的区域差异与发展趋势分析[J]. 环境科学,2013,34(7):2766-2774.[QIU Huan-guang,LIAO Shao-pan,JING Yue,et al.Regional Differences and Development Tendency of Livestock Manure Pollution in China[J]. Environmental Science,2013,34(7):2766-2774.]
[4] 张藤丽,焉莉,韦大明.基于全国耕地消纳的畜禽粪便特征分布与环境承载力预警分析[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2020,28(5):745-755.[ZHANG Teng-li,YAN Li,WEI Da-ming.Characteristic Distribution of Livestock Manure and Warning Analysis of Environmental Carrying Capacity Based on the Consumption of Cultivated Land in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-agriculture,2020,28(5):745-755.]
[5] 朱志平,董红敏,魏莎,等.中国畜禽粪便管理变化对温室气体排放的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2020,39(4):743-748.[ZHU Zhi-ping,DONG Hong-min,WEI Sha,et al.Impact of Changes in Livestock Manure Management on Greenhouse Gas Emissions in China[J]. Journal of Agro-environment Science,2020,39(4):743-748.]
[6] 阎波杰,潘瑜春,闫静杰.安徽省县域耕地畜禽养殖废弃物养分负荷时空演变特征[J]. 生态与农村环境学报,2016,32(3):466-472.[YAN Bo-jie,PAN Yu-chun,YAN Jing-jie.Spatio-temporal Evolution of Livestock Manure Nutrient Load in Farmland on a County Scale:A Case Study of Anhui Province[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment,2016,32(3):466-472.]
[7] FUCHS W,DROSG B.Assessment of the State of the Art of Technologies for the Processing of Digestate Residue from Anaerobic Digesters[J]. Water Science and Technology:a Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research,2013,67(9):1984-1993.
[8] OWUSU-TWUM M Y,POLASTRE A,SUBEDI R,et al.Gaseous Emissions and Modification of Slurry Composition during Storage and after Field Application:Effect of Slurry Additives and Mechanical Separation[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2017,200:416-422.
[9] EVANS L,VAN DER ZAAG A C,SOKOLOV V,et al.Ammonia Emissions from the Field Application of Liquid Dairy Manure after Anaerobic Digestion or Mechanical Separation in Ontario,Canada[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2018,258:89-95.
[10] FANGUEIRO D,SURGY S,FRAGA I,et al.Band Application of Treated Cattle Slurry as an Alternative to Slurry Injection:Implications for Gaseous Emissions,Soil Quality,and Plant Growth[J]. Agriculture,Ecosystems & Environment,2015,211:102-111.
[11] REGUEIRO I,COUTINHO J,GIOELLI F,et al.Acidification of Raw and Co-digested Pig Slurries with Alum before Mechanical Separation Reduces Gaseous Emission during Storage of Solid and Liquid Fractions[J]. Agriculture,Ecosystems & Environment,2016,227:42-51.
[12] ANDRIAMANOHIARISOAMANANA F J,SAIKAWA A,KAN T,et al.Semi-continuous Anaerobic Co-digestion of Dairy Manure,Meat and Bone Meal and Crude Glycerol:Process Performance and Digestate Valorization[J]. Renewable Energy,2018,128:1-8.
[13] WALKER P M,WADE C A,KELLEY T R.Evaluation of a Polyacrylamide Assisted Solid/Liquid Separation System for the Treatment of Liquid Pig Manure[J]. Biosystems Engineering,2010,105(2):241-246.
[14] PETERSEN S O,SCHJØNNING P,THOMSEN I K,et al.Nitrous Oxide Evolution from Structurally Intact Soil as Influenced by Tillage and Soil Water Content[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2008,40(4):967-977.
[15] 宣梦,许振成,吴根义,等.我国规模化畜禽养殖粪污资源化利用分析[J]. 农业资源与环境学报,2018,35(2):126-132.[XUAN Meng,XU Zhen-cheng,WU Gen-yi,et al.Analysis of Utilization of Fecal Resources in Large-scale Livestock and Poultry Breeding in China[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment,2018,35(2):126-132.]
[16] REGUEIRO I,COUTINHO J,BALSARI P,et al.Acidification of Pig Slurry before Separation to Improve Slurry Management on Farms[J]. Environmental Technology,2016,37(15):1906-1913.
[17] VU P T,MELSE R W,ZEEMAN G,et al.Composition and Biogas Yield of a Novel Source Segregation System for Pig Excreta[J]. Biosystems Engineering,2016,145:29-38.
[18] SUTARYO S,WARD A J,MØLLER H B.Anaerobic Digestion of Acidified Slurry Fractions Derived from Different Solid-liquid Separation Methods[J]. Bioresource Technology,2013,130:495-501.
[19] PERAZZOLO F,MATTACHINI G,TAMBONE F,et al.Effect of Mechanical Separation on Emissions during Storage of Two Anaerobically Codigested Animal Slurries[J]. Agriculture,Ecosystems & Environment,2015,207:1-9.
[20] DINUCCIO E,GIOELLI F,BALSARI P,et al.Ammonia Losses from the Storage and Application of Raw and Chemo-mechanically Separated Slurry[J]. Agriculture,Ecosystems & Environment,2012,153:16-23.
[21] VAN OTTI M B,RO K S,SZOGI A A,et al.High-rate Solid-liquid Separation Coupled with Nitrogen and Phosphorus Treatment of Swine Manure:Effect on Water Quality[J]. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems,2018,2:49.
[22] FANGUEIRO D,COUTINHO J,BORGES L,et al.Recovery Efficiency of Nitrogen from Liquid and Solid Fractions of Pig Slurry Obtained Using Different Separation Technologies[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science,2015,178(2):229-236.
[23] OLATUYI S O,KUMARAGAMAGE D,AKINREMI O O,et al.Heavy-metal Fractions in Solid and Liquid Separates of Swine Slurry Separated Using Different Technologies[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality,2014,43(5):1779-1789.
[24] BALSARI P,DINUCCIO E,SANTORO E,et al.Ammonia Emissions from Rough Cattle Slurry and from Derived Solid and Liquid Fractions Applied to Alfalfa Pasture[J]. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture,2008,48(2):198.
[25] MARTINEZ-ALMELA J,BARRERA J M.SELCO-Ecopurin^® Pig Slurry Treatment System[J]. Bioresource Technology,2005,96(2):223-228.
[26] 刘羽,刘婕,王朝元,等.规模奶牛养殖室外运动场春季温室气体与氨气排放特性[J]. 农业工程学报,2018,34(22):178-184.[LIU Yu,LIU Jie,WANG Chao-yuan,et al.Emission Characteristic of Greenhouse Gases and Ammonia from Open Lot of Scale Dairy Farm in Spring[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2018,34(22):178-184.]
[27] 朱新梦,董雯怡,王洪媛,等.牛粪堆肥方式对温室气体和氨气排放的影响[J]. 农业工程学报,2017,33(10):258-264.[ZHU Xin-meng,DONG Wen-yi,WANG Hong-yuan,et al.Effects of Cattle Manure Composting Methods on Greenhouse Gas and Ammonia Emissions[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2017,33(10):258-264.]
[28] 王文林,童仪,杜薇,等.畜禽养殖氨排放清单研究现状与实证[J]. 生态与农村环境学报,2018,34(9):813-820.[WANG Wen-lin,TONG Yi,DU Wei,et al.Empirical Study on Ammonia Emission Inventory from Livestock[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment,2018,34(9):813-820.]
[29] VAN DER ZAAG A C,BALDÉ H,CROLLA A,et al.Potential Methane Emission Reductions for Two Manure Treatment Technologies[J]. Environmental Technology,2018,39(7):851-858.
[30] AGUIRRE-VILLEGAS H A,LARSON R A,SHARARA M A.Anaerobic Digestion,Solid-liquid Separation,and Drying of Dairy Manure:Measuring Constituents and Modeling Emission[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2019,696:134059.
[31] MØLLER H B,SOMMER S G,AHRING B K.Separation Efficiency and Particle Size Distribution in Relation to Manure Type and Storage Conditions[J]. Bioresource Technology,2002,85(2):189-196.
[32] GUILAYN F,JIMENEZ J,ROUEZ M,et al.Digestate Mechanical Separation:Efficiency Profiles Based on Anaerobic Digestion Feedstock and Equipment Choice[J]. Bioresource Technology,2019,274:180-189.
[33] IPCC.Climate Change 2014:Contribution of Working Groups Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change[R]. IPCC:Geneva,Switzerland,2015.
[34] WEBB J,CHADWICK D,ELLIS S.Emissions of Ammonia and Nitrous Oxide Following Incorporation into the Soil of Farmyard Manures Stored at Different Densities[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems,2004,70(1):67-76.
[35] ZHU B Q,KROS J,LESSCHEN J P,et al.Assessment of Uncertainties in Greenhouse Gas Emission Profiles of Livestock Sectors in Africa,Latin America and Europe[J]. Regional Environmental Change,2016,16(6):1571-1582.
[36] HOU Y,VELTHOF G L,LESSCHEN J P,et al.Nutrient Recovery and Emissions of Ammonia,Nitrous Oxide,and Methane from Animal Manure in Europe:Effects of Manure Treatment Technologies[J]. Environmental Science & Technology,2017,51(1):375-383.
[37] BAUER A,MAYR H,HOPFNER-SIXT K,et al.Detailed Monitoring of Two Biogas Plants and Mechanical Solid-liquid Separation of Fermentation Residues[J]. Journal of Biotechnology,2009,142(1):56-63.
[38] MEYER D,RISTOW P L,LIE M.Particle Size and Nutrient Distribution in Fresh Dairy Manure[J]. Applied Engineering in Agriculture,2007,23(1):113-118.
[39] QI G D,PAN Z F,ANDRIAMANOHIARISOAMANANA F J,et al.Effect of Solid-liquid Separation on Anaerobic Digestion of Dairy Manure in Semi-continuous Stirred Tank Reactors:Process Performance and Digestate Characteristics[J]. Animal Science Journal,2020,91(1):e13393.
[40] PETERS K,HJORTH M,JENSEN L S,et al.Carbon,Nitrogen,and Phosphorus Distribution in Particle Size-fractionated Separated Pig and Cattle Slurry[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality,2011,40(1):224-232.
[41] MONTENY G J,GROENESTEIN C M,HILHORST M A.Interactions and Coupling between Emissions of Methane and Nitrous Oxide from Animal Husbandry[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems,2001,60(1):123-132.
[42] SOMMER S G,HJORTH M,LEAHY J J,et al.Pig Slurry Characteristics,Nutrient Balance and Biogas Production as Affected by Separation and Acidification[J]. The Journal of Agricultural Science,2015,153(1):177-191.
[43] VERDI L,KUIKMAN P J,ORLANDINI S,et al.Does the Use of Digestate to Replace Mineral Fertilizers Have less Emissions of N₂O and NH₃?[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2019,269/270:112-118.
[44] HOLLY M A.Abatement of Greenhouse Gas and Ammonia Emissions from Storage and Land Application of Dairy Manure[D]. Madison,USA:The University of Wisconsin,2016.
[45] FANGUEIRO D,COUTINHO J,CHADWICK D,et al.Effect of Cattle Slurry Separation on Greenhouse Gas and Ammonia Emissions during Storage[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality,2008,37(6):2322-2331.