酒石酸、柠檬酸和苹果酸对污染土壤中镧的去除效果

doi:10.11934/j.issn.1673-4831.2016.01.019

生态与农村环境学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 115-119.doi: 10.11934/j.issn.1673-4831.2016.01.019

酒石酸、柠檬酸和苹果酸对污染土壤中镧的去除效果

梁俊捷¹, 张世熔², 廖成阳², 肖罗怡², 王贵胤²

1. 四川农业大学资源学院, 四川成都 611130;
2. 四川农业大学环境学院/四川省土壤环境保护重点实验室, 四川成都 611130

收稿日期:2015-03-19 出版日期:2016-01-25 发布日期:2016-01-27
通讯作者: 张世熔,通信作者E-mail:rsz01@163.com E-mail:rsz01@163.com
作者简介:梁俊捷(1991-),女,河南周口人,硕士生,主要从事土壤污染评价方面的研究。E-mail:Liangj_j@163.com
基金资助:
四川省科技支撑计划(2014NZ0044)

Effects of Tartaric Acid, Citric Acid and Malic Acid Removing Lanthanum From Polluted Soils

LIANG Jun-jie¹, ZHANG Shi-rong², LIAO Cheng-yang², XIAO Luo-yi², WANG Gui-yin²

1. College of Resources, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China;
2. College of Environment/Key Laboratory of Soil Environment Protection of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China

Received:2015-03-19 Online:2016-01-25 Published:2016-01-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过振荡淋洗法研究了酒石酸、柠檬酸和苹果酸在不同浓度、淋洗时间和pH值条件下对2种污染农田土壤中镧(La)的去除效率。结果表明,在25℃、200 r·min^-1恒温振荡条件下,3种淋洗剂对人工污染土壤镧的淋洗率均随浓度的增加而增加,随淋洗时间的延长而增加至稳定状态,随着pH值的增加呈先增加后减小趋势。3者的最佳淋洗浓度、时间和pH值分别为0.01 g·mL^-1、4 h和5.0,在此条件下,酒石酸、柠檬酸和苹果酸对w(La)为300 mg·kg^-1人工污染土壤的最佳淋洗率分别为57.13%、62.32%和54.86%,对w(La)为2500 mg·kg^-1人工污染土壤的最佳淋洗率分别为74.39%、77.94%和72.75%,对w(La)为463.6 mg·kg^-1的矿区土壤的最佳淋洗率分别为17.8%、23.7%和24.3%。综合考虑土壤中La的去除效果和成本,选择柠檬酸作为最佳淋洗剂。

关键词: 污染土壤, 有机酸, 镧(La), 淋洗, 效率

Abstract:

Effects of tartaric acid, citric acid and malic acid removing lanthanum(La) from polluted soils, relative to concentration of the leachate, duration of leaching and soil pH were investigated through a leaching experiment. Results show that in the vibrating leaching experiment constant in condition(25℃ and 200 r·min^-1), La removal increased with rising concentration of any one of the three organic acids, increased and then leveled off with the experiment going on and rose and fell with rising soil pH. It was found that for the three organic acids, the optimal concentration, leaching time and pH was 0.01 g·mL^-1, 4 h and 5.0, respectively, in the experiment of removing La. Under such conditions, La removal rate of tartaric acid, citric acid and malic acid reached 57.13%, 62.32% and 54.86%, respectively, in the soil being 300 mg·kg^-1 in La concentration, 74.39%, 77.94% and 72.75%, respectively, in the soil being 2500 mg·kg^-1 in La concentration, and 17.8%, 23.7% and 24.3%, respectively, in the soil being 463.6 mg·kg^-1 in La concentration in a mine area. Taking into account comprehensively La removing efficiency and cost, citric acid should be cited as the optimal leaching agent.

Key words: polluted soil, organic acid, lanthanum(La), leaching, removal rate

中图分类号:

梁俊捷, 张世熔, 廖成阳, 肖罗怡, 王贵胤. 酒石酸、柠檬酸和苹果酸对污染土壤中镧的去除效果[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(1): 115-119.

LIANG Jun-jie, ZHANG Shi-rong, LIAO Cheng-yang, XIAO Luo-yi, WANG Gui-yin. Effects of Tartaric Acid, Citric Acid and Malic Acid Removing Lanthanum From Polluted Soils[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2016, 32(1): 115-119.

参考文献

[1] SHEN Y C,ZHANG S R,LI S,et al.Eucalyptus Tolerance Mechanisms to Lanthanum and Cerium:Subcellular Distribution,Antioxidant System and Thiol Pools[J].Chemosphere,2014,117:567-574.
[2] YAO Z T,LI J H,XIE H H,et al.Review on Remediation Technologies of Soil Contaminated by Heavy metals[J].Procedia Environmental Sciences,2012,16:722-729.
[3] RUTIGLIANO L,FINO D,SARACCO G,et al.Electrokinetic Remediation of Soils Contaminated With Heavy Metals[J].Journal of Applied Electrochemistry,2008,38(7):1035-1041.
[4] HOUBEN D,EVRARD L,SONNET P.Beneficial Effects of Biochar Application to Contaminated Soils on the Bioavailability of Cd,Pb and Zn and the Biomass Production of Rapeseed(Brassica napus L.)[J].Biomass and Bioenergy,2013,57:196-204.
[5] MULLIGAN C N,YONG R N,GIBBS B F.Remediation Technologies for Metal-Contaminated Soils and Groundwater:An Evaluation[J].Engineering Geology,2001,60(1):193-207.
[6] DERMONT G,BERGERON M,MERCIER G,et al.Soil Washing for Metal Removal:A Review of Physical/Chemical Technologies and Field Applications[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2008,152(1):1-31.
[7] SINGH A K,CAMEOTRA S S.Efficiency of Lipopeptide Biosurfactants in Removal of Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Heavy Metals from Contaminated Soil[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2013,20(10):7367-7376.
[8] JAGTAP S S,WOO S M,KIM T S,et al.Phytoremediation of Diesel-Contaminated Soil and Saccharification of the Resulting Biomass[J].Fuel,2014,116:292-298.
[9] MOUTSATSOU A,GREGOU M,MATSAS D,et al.Washing as a Remediation Technology Applicable in Soils Heavily Polluted by Mining-Metallurgical Activities[J].Chemosphere,2006,63(10):1632-1640.
[10] NOWACK B.Environmental Chemistry of Aminopolycarboxylate Chelating Agents[J].Environmental Science and Technology,2002,36(19):4009-4016.
[11] CAO M H,HU Y,SUN Q,et al.Enhanced Desorption of PCB and Trace Metal Elements(Pb and Cu) from Contaminated Soils by Saponin and EDDS Mixed Solution[J].Environmental Pollution,2013,174:93-99.
[12] MULLIGAN C N,WANG S.Remediation of a Heavy Metal-Contaminated Soil by a Rhamnolipid Foam[J].Engineering Geology,2006,85(1):75-81.
[13] 易龙生,王文燕,陶冶,等.有机酸对污染土壤重金属的淋洗效果研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2013,32(4):701-707.
[14] 甘文君,何跃,张孝飞,等.电镀厂污染土壤重金属形态及淋洗去除效果[J].生态与农村环境学报,2012,28(1):82-87.
[15] JIA W,STACEY S P,MCLAUGHLIN M J,et al.Biodegradation of Rhamnolipid,EDTA and Citric Acid in Cadmium and Zinc Contaminated Soils[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2009,41(10):2214-2221.
[16] KUO S,LAI M S,LIN C W.Influence of Solution Acidity and CaCl₂ Concentration on the Removal of Heavy Metals from Metal-Contaminated Rice Soils[J].Environmental Pollution,2006,144(3):918-925.
[17] BEGUM Z A,RAHMAN I M M,TATE Y,et al.Remediation of Toxic Metal Contaminated Soil by Washing With Biodegradable Aminopolycarboxylate Chelants[J].Chemosphere,2012,87(10):1161-1170.
[18] 梁丽丽,郭书海,李刚,等.柠檬酸/柠檬酸钠淋洗铬污染土壤效果及弱酸可提取态铬含量的变化[J].农业环境科学学报,2011,30(5):881-885.
[19] SHAKER M A,ALBISHRI H M.Dynamics and Thermodynamics of Toxic Metals Adsorption Onto Soil-Extracted Humic Acid[J].Chemosphere,2014,111:587-595.
[20] 梁金利,蔡焕兴,段雪梅,等.有机酸土柱淋洗法修复重金属污染土壤[J].环境工程学报,2012,6(9):3339-3343.
[21] VAN DE VIVERE P,HAMMES F,VERSTRAETE W,et al.Metal Decontamination of Soil,Sediment,and Sewage Sludge by Means of Transition Metal Chelant[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering,2001,127(9):802-811.
[22] POLETTINI A,POMI R,ROLLE E.The Effect of Operating Variables on Chelant-Assisted Remediation of Contaminated Dredged Sediment[J].Chemosphere,2007,66(5):866-877.
[23] CAO X,CHEN Y,WANG X,et al.Effects of Redox Potential and pH Value on the Release of Rare Earth Elements from Soil[J].Chemosphere,2001,44(4):655-661.
[24] JANG M,HWANG J S,CHOI S I.Sequential Soil Washing Techniques Using Hydrochloric Acid and Sodium Hydroxide for Remediating Arsenic-Contaminated Soils in Abandoned Iron-Ore Mines[J].Chemosphere,2007,66(1):8-17.

酒石酸、柠檬酸和苹果酸对污染土壤中镧的去除效果

Effects of Tartaric Acid, Citric Acid and Malic Acid Removing Lanthanum From Polluted Soils

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李建查, 李坤, 方海东, 张雷, 潘志贤, 岳学文, 何光熊, 段琪彩, 史亮涛. 不同滴灌模式对干热河谷甜玉米生物量分配、产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(7): 947-952.
[2]	刘福兴, 陈桂发, 付子轼, 杨林章, 王俊力. 不同构造生态沟渠的农田面源污染物处理能力及实际应用效果[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(6): 787-794.
[3]	夏永秋, 杨旺鑫, 施卫明, 颜晓元. 我国集约化种植业面源氮发生量估算[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(9): 782-787.
[4]	邓天天, 马培, 李晗晟, 郭枫, 吴烨. FeCl₃-柠檬酸对低浓度As³⁺污染土壤的淋洗特性[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(2): 169-176.
[5]	张振龙, 孙慧, 苏洋, 何昭丽. 中国西北干旱地区水资源利用效率及其影响因素[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2017, 33(11): 961-967.
[6]	郑学博, 樊剑波, 崔键, 徐磊, 祝振球, 何园球, 周静. 沼液化肥配施对旱地红壤花生养分吸收分配和产量的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(2): 332-337.
[7]	武振中,杨启良,贾维兵,王亓剑,赵馀,李云青 . 不同浓度镍胁迫对小桐子光合特性、形态特征及水分利用的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2015, 31(5): 767-773.
[8]	郑莹莹, 周锐, 王新军. 基于DEA-Tobit两阶段法的上海浦东新区垃圾转运效率及其影响因素[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2015, 31(3): 308-313.
[9]	芮俊伟, 周贝贝, 钱谊, 孙靖. 生态工业园区生态效率评估方法研究及应用[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2013, 29(4): 466-470.
[10]	王玉梅, 丁俊新, 魏兴华. 山东省循环经济建设的生态效率测度[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2013, 29(4): 460-465.
[11]	樊建新, 王玉军, 崔晓丹, 范婷婷, 周东美. 基于同步辐射的硬X射线荧光技术分析污染土壤中重金属分布[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2013, 29(3): 375-379.
[12]	杜瑞英. 土壤改良剂和红麻联合修复对多金属污染土壤中微生物群落功能的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2013, 29(1): 70-75.
[13]	曲晶晶, 郑金伟, 郑聚锋, 张旭辉, 李恋卿, 潘根兴, 纪雄辉, 余喜初. 小麦秸秆生物质炭对水稻产量及晚稻氮素利用率的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2012, 28(3): 288-293.
[14]	黄健, 李春玉, 刘济宁, 石利利, 姚成. 生物堆模拟法修复苯并[a]芘和二苯并[a,h]蒽污染土壤[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2012, 28(2): 221-224.
[15]	甘文君, 何跃, 张孝飞, 单艳红, 郑丽萍, 林玉锁. 电镀厂污染土壤重金属形态及淋洗去除效果[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2012, 28(1): 82-87.