生态与农村环境学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 409-418.doi: 10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2018.0431

• 区域环境与发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

泸州市农业碳收支时空变化及公平性评价

罗红1,2, 罗怀良1,2, 李朝艳1, 熊静芸1   

  1. 1. 四川师范大学地理与资源科学学院, 四川 成都 610068;
    2. 四川师范大学西南土地资源评价与监测教育部重点实验室, 四川 成都 610068
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-23 出版日期:2019-04-25 发布日期:2019-04-25
  • 通讯作者: 罗怀良 E-mail:huaill@163.com
  • 作者简介:罗红(1993-),女,四川叙永人,硕士生,研究方向为资源开发与区域发展。E-mail:1591800371@qq.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家社会科学基金(17BGL137)

Spatio-Temporal Change in Agricultural Carbon Production Budget and Evaluation of Agricultural Carbon Emission Equity in Luzhou City

LUO Hong1,2, LUO Huai-liang1,2, LI Chao-yan1, XIONG Jing-yun1   

  1. 1. Geography and Resources Science College of Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610068, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Southwest Land Resources Evaluation and Monitoring of Ministry of Education of China, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610068, China
  • Received:2018-07-23 Online:2019-04-25 Published:2019-04-25

摘要:

根据泸州市空间面板数据,分别采用参数估算法及IPCC清单估算法估算该市2006-2015年农业生产碳收支状况,并用生态承载系数及经济效率系数进行区域农业碳排放公平性评价。结果表明:(1)2006-2015年该市农业碳吸收量由166.47×107 kg增长到188.38×107 kg,水稻碳吸收占比最大。农业碳吸收强度由2006年的8×103kg·hm-2上升到2015年的8.96×103 kg·hm-2,其中龙马潭区叙永县明显减弱,而泸县和合江县显著增强。(2)研究期该市农业碳排放量由144.02×107 kg减少到127.71×107 kg,其中牲畜养殖是最大排放源。农业碳排放强度由2006年的6.92×103 kg·hm-2下降到2015年的6.07×103 kg·hm-2,其中龙马潭区、纳溪区、叙永县和古蔺县明显减弱,而泸县显著增强。(3)农业碳排放生态承载力从大到小依次为江阳 > 龙马潭 > 泸县 > 合江 > 纳溪 > 古蔺 > 叙永;农业经济效率从大到小依次为龙马潭 > 江阳 > 泸县 > 合江 > 纳溪 > 古蔺 > 叙永。(4)农业碳排放公平性聚类分析结果显示,该市北部平原地区在一定程度上分担了其他地区的农业碳减排压力,南部山区农业碳排放则加重了该市农业碳减排压力。

关键词: 农业碳收支, 公平性评价, 泸州市

Abstract:

Based on spatial data of Luzhou City, the parameter estimation and IPCC inventory estimation methods were used to estimate the carbon budget of agricultural production in the city from 2006 to 2015. The equity of regional agricultural carbon emissions has been evaluated using the ecological carrying and economic efficiency coefficients. The results show that:(1) Within the ten years, the city's agricultural carbon absorption had increased from 166.47×107 kg to 188.38×107 kg, while rice had the largest share of carbon sequestration. The carbon absorption intensity from agriculture rose from 8×103 kg·hm-2 in 2006 to 8.96×103 kg·hm-2 in 2015. Among the areas in Luzhou City, carbon absorption intensity was significantly weakened in Longmatan and Xuyong, while that from Luxian and Hejiang increased significantly. (2) During the study period, the city's carbon emissions from agriculture reduced from 144.02×107 kg to 127.71×107 kg, of which livestock breeding was the largest source of emissions. The carbon intensity of agriculture fell from 6.92×103 kg·hm-2 in 2006 to 6.07×103 kg·hm-2 in 2015, with intensities from Longmatan, Naxi, Xuyong, and Gulin weakening significantly, while the intensity from Luxian significantly increased. (3) The ecological carrying capacity of agricultural carbon emissions was the largest in Jiangyang, followed by Longmatan, Luxian, Hejiang, Naxi, Gulin and Xuyong. Agricultural production efficiency ranked as following:Longmatan > Jiangyang > Luxian > Hejiang > Naxi > Gulin>Xuyong. (4) A cluster analysis of agricultural carbon emission equity shows that the northern plains to certain extent shared the pressure of other areas of the city on reducing agricultural carbon emission. But the carbon emissions from agricultural production in the southern mountainous areas of the city increased the pressure on the city for the reduction of agricultural carbon emission.

Key words: agricultural carbon budget, equity evaluation, Luzhou City

中图分类号: