油菜蚜虫防治用药对蜜蜂的急性毒性与风险评价

doi:10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2018.0137

生态与农村环境学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 500-505.doi: 10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2018.0137

油菜蚜虫防治用药对蜜蜂的急性毒性与风险评价

谭丽超¹, 程燕¹, 朱昱璇¹, 卜元卿^1,2

1. 生态环境部南京环境科学研究所国家环境保护农药环境评价与污染控制重点实验室, 江苏南京 210042;
2. 南京信息工程大学江苏省大气环境与装备技术协同创新中心, 江苏南京 210044

收稿日期:2018-03-21 出版日期:2019-04-25 发布日期:2019-04-25
通讯作者: 程燕 E-mail:chynies@163.com
作者简介:谭丽超(1985-),女,山东威海人,助理研究员,硕士,主要研究方向为农药环境毒理与生态风险评估。E-mail:tcldemengxiang@163.com
基金资助:
国家研发专项（2017YFD0800705）

Acute Toxicity and Risk Assessment of Nine Insecticides to Honeybees in Oilseed Rape Fields

TAN Li-chao¹, CHENG Yan¹, ZHU Yu-xuan¹, BU Yuan-qing^1,2

1. Key Laboratory of Pesticide Environmental Assessment and Pollution Control, Nanjing Institute of Environmental Science, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing 210042, China;
2. Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China

Received:2018-03-21 Online:2019-04-25 Published:2019-04-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为评价油菜蚜虫防治用药对蜜蜂的影响，测定了9种常用于防治油菜蚜虫的杀虫剂对意大利蜜蜂（Apis mellifera）的急性毒性，并采用商值法开展喷施场景下的蜜蜂风险评价。结果显示，70%吡虫啉水分散粒剂（以有效成分质量分数计，下同）、10%烯啶虫胺水剂、25%噻虫嗪悬浮剂、5%丁硫克百威乳油和2.5%溴氰菊酯乳油对蜜蜂均为高毒，但对蜜蜂的风险水平却不尽相同，其中25%噻虫嗪悬浮剂、70%吡虫啉水分散粒剂、10%烯啶虫胺水剂和2.5%溴氰菊酯乳油对蜜蜂的风险不可接受，5%丁硫克百威乳油可通过减少用量来降低对蜜蜂的风险；50%抗蚜威可湿性粉剂对蜜蜂经口和接触毒性等级分别为中毒和低毒，也需要通过减少用量来降低对蜜蜂的风险；5%啶虫脒乳油、48%噻虫啉悬浮剂和25%吡蚜酮悬浮剂对蜜蜂的毒性等级分别为中毒、低毒和低毒，风险可接受。因此油菜蚜虫防治可优先选用对蜜蜂风险性低的品种（噻虫啉、吡蚜酮），建议施用其他杀虫剂时避开养蜂区和蜜源期，降低对蜜蜂的毒性风险。

关键词: 杀虫剂, 意大利蜜蜂, 急性毒性, 风险评价

Abstract:

Insecticides are used for the controlling of aphids in oilseed rape fields. To evaluate the effects of insecticides on honeybees(Apis mellifera) in oilseed rape fields, acute toxicities of 9 insecticides were tested. Meanwhile, risk assessment was carried out by risk quotients(RQ) method when the 9 insecticides were applied by spraying. The results showed that:the toxicity levels of 70% imidacridine WG, 10% dimethylamine AS, 25% thiazolazine SC, 5% dithiocarbamate GF and 2.5% deltamethrin EC to honeybees were all at high class. However, the risk levels were different, and the risk of 25% thiazolazine SC, 70% imidacridine WG, 10% dimethylamine AS and 2.5% deltamethrin EC were unacceptable to honeybees. The risk of 5% dithiocarbamate GF to honeybees could be reduced by decreasing the amount and frequency of use. The oral and contact toxicity of 50% pirimicarb WP were moderate and low to honeybees, respectively, and the risk could also be reduced by decreasing the amount and frequency of use. The toxicity levels of 5% acetamiprid EC, 48% thiacloprid SC and 25% pymetrozine SC to honeybees were moderate, low and low, respectively. The risk levels of those insecticides are acceptable. The insecticides with low-risk to honeybees such as thiacloprid and pymetrozine could be priority to control the aphids in oilseed rape fields. In order to decrease the hazard of insecticides on honeybees, it is recommended to avoid using insecticides with high-risk in beekeeping areas and in blooming period of honey source crops.

Key words: insecticides, honeybee, acute toxicity, risk assessment

中图分类号:

X592

谭丽超, 程燕, 朱昱璇, 卜元卿. 油菜蚜虫防治用药对蜜蜂的急性毒性与风险评价[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(4): 500-505.

TAN Li-chao, CHENG Yan, ZHU Yu-xuan, BU Yuan-qing. Acute Toxicity and Risk Assessment of Nine Insecticides to Honeybees in Oilseed Rape Fields[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2019, 35(4): 500-505.

参考文献

[1] 杨红旗, 徐艳华. 我国油菜生产现状与发展[J]. 种子世界, 2010(7):1-2.[YANG Hong-qi,XU Yan-hua. Current Status and Development of Canola Production in China[J]. Seed World, 2010(7):1-2.]
[2] 李洪芳. 蜜蜂传粉在油菜增产中的应用技术[J]. 北方园艺, 2007(11):123-123.
[3] 高新云, 蔡继红. 农药中毒事件应引起各方重视[J]. 中国蜂业, 2007,58(2):41-41.
[4] 李位三, 王启发. 作物花期喷施农药的负效应分析[J]. 养蜂科技, 2002(6):6-7.
[5] DESNEUX N,DECOURTYE A,DELPUECH J M. The Sublethal Effects of Pesticides on Beneficial Arthropods[J]. Annual Review of Entomology,2007,52:81-106.
[6] 吴迟, 姜辉, 王长宾, 等. 四种新烟碱类杀虫剂对蜜蜂的急性毒性及初级风险评估[J]. 农药学学报, 2015,17(4):486-491.[WU Chi,JIANG Hui,WANG Chang-bin,et al. Acute Toxicity and First Tier Risk Assessment of Four Neonicotinoid Insecticides to Honeybees[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science,2015,17(4):486-491.]
[7] 季守民, 程传英, 袁传卫, 等. 7种新烟碱类杀虫剂对意大利蜜蜂的急性毒性及风险评价[J]. 农药, 2015, 54(4):282-285.[JI Shou-min,CHENG Chuan-ying,YUAN Chuan-wei,et al. Acute Toxicity and Risk Assessment of Seven Neonicotinoid Insecticides on Honeybees (Apis mellifera L.)[J]. Pesticides, 2015,54(4):282-285.]
[8] 刘丽丽, 李吉海. 新烟碱类杀虫剂的进展与合成[J]. 山东化工, 2003,32(1):11-16.[LIU Li-li,LI Ji-hai. Advance and Synthesis of Newnicotinoid Insecticides[J]. Shandong Chemical Industry,2003,32(1):11-16.]
[9] 徐庆丰, 田超. 高效杀虫剂吡蚜酮的合成[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2013,19(4):76-77.[XU Qing-feng,TIAN Chao. The Systhesis of Insecticide Pymetrozine[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin,2013,19(4):76-77.]
[10] 姜雅君. 基甲酸酯类杀虫剂丁硫克百威[J]. 农药, 1998, 37(9):45-45.
[11] 李新. 拟除虫菊酯类杀虫剂研发及市场概况[J]. 农药, 2016, 55(9):625-630.[LI Xin. The R&D and Market Profile of the Pyrethroid Insecticides[J]. Pesticides, 2016, 55(9):625-630.]
[12] GB/T 31270.10-2014, 化学农药环境安全评价试验准则第10部分:蜜蜂急性毒性试验[S].[GB/T 31270.10-2014, Test Guidelines on Environmental Safety Assessment for Chemical Pesticides:Part 10:Honeybee Acute Toxicity Test[S].]
[13] 罗术东, 安建东, 李继莲, 等.化学农药对蜜蜂的急性毒性测定方法与危害评价[J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2009,35(3):320-324.[LUO Shu-dong,AN Jian-dong,LI Ji-lian,et al. Hazard Assessment and Methods to Measure the Acute Toxicity of Chemical Pesticides to Bees[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University(Natutal Sciences), 2009, 35(3):320-324.]
[14] NY/T 2882.4-2016, 农药登记环境风险评估指南第4部分:蜜蜂[S].
[15] EFSA. EFSA Identifies Risks to Bees From Neonicotinoids[N/OL]. (2013-01-16)[2018-03-01]. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press/news/130116.htm?utm_source=homepage&utm_medium=infocus&utm_campaign=beehealth.
[16] EFSA. Regarding Risks for Bees Related to the Use of the Neonicotinoid Pesticides Thiamethoxam,Clothianidin and Imidacloprid[R].[s. l.]:EFSA,2013.
[17] USEPA. Guidance for Assessing Pesticide Risks to Bees[R].[s. l.]:USEPA,2014.
[18] USEPA. EPA Actions to Protect Pollinators[EB/OL]. (2017-07-01)[2018-03-01]. http://www2.epa.gov/pollinator-protection/epa-actions-protect-pollinators.

油菜蚜虫防治用药对蜜蜂的急性毒性与风险评价

Acute Toxicity and Risk Assessment of Nine Insecticides to Honeybees in Oilseed Rape Fields

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	马舒欣, 乔永民, 唐梦瑶, 杨洪允. 广州市主要湖泊沉积物重金属污染与生态风险评价[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(5): 600-607.
[2]	赵涵, 赵军, 徐晓晔, 吴绍华, 朱青. 快速城市化地区土壤多环芳烃的空间分布及来源:以深圳市为例[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(1): 38-45.
[3]	陈垚, 甘春娟, 张彩, 袁绍春, 朱子奇. 城市雨水塘生态风险评价方法[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(12): 1064-1073.
[4]	蔡小宇, 姜锦林, 单正军, 卜元卿, 续卫利. 壬基酚聚氧乙烯醚对大型溞的急性和慢性毒性效应[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(1): 81-86.
[5]	王佳佳, 李翔, 罗楠, 何跃, 刘永兵, 卢一富, 苗向前, 吕利光. 以设计精准修复方案为目标的土壤重金属形态分布研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(1): 87-95.
[6]	任文娟, 汪贞, 杨先海, 刘济宁, 杨倩, 陈英文, 沈树宝. 双酚A及其类似物对斑马鱼成鱼及胚胎的急性毒性[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2017, 33(4): 372-378.
[7]	刘世梁, 侯笑云, 张月秋, 尹艺洁, 王军. 基于生态系统服务的土地整治生态风险评价与管控建议[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2017, 33(3): 193-200.
[8]	冯艳红, 郑丽萍, 应蓉蓉, 张亚, 林玉锁, 王国庆. 黔西北炼锌矿区土壤重金属形态分析及风险评价[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2017, 33(2): 142-149.
[9]	邱孟龙, 王琦, 刘黎明, 刚毅. 优化赋权模糊综合评价法对耕地土壤重金属污染的风险评价[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2017, 33(11): 1049-1056.
[10]	徐怀洲, 宋宁慧, 张圣虎, 汪贞, 吉贵祥, 刘济宁, 石利利. 骆马湖邻苯二甲酸酯分布特征及健康风险评价[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2017, 33(10): 928-934.
[11]	李少华, 王学全, 兰岚, 高琪, 杨占武. 青海湖流域主要河口区沉积物中重金属元素生态风险评价[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(6): 940-945.
[12]	李娟英, 石文瑄, 崔昱, 李润奇. 滴水湖水体及沉积物中重金属和多环芳烃的污染分析与评价[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(1): 96-101.
[13]	龙涛,邓绍坡,吴运金,祝欣,林玉锁,周军英. 生态风险评价框架进展研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2015, 31(6): 822-830.
[14]	张春慧,陈美招,郑荣宝. 基于“3S”技术和LR-WSVM模型的广州市花都区滑坡灾害风险评估与区划研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2015, 31(6): 955-962.
[15]	卓东, 刘黎明, 邝琴霞, 起晓星. 农业土地利用系统的环境风险分析与评价方法研究：以湖南省桃江县为例[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2014, 30(4): 526-532.