西南天然林保护工程区生态成效评估

doi:10.11934/j.issn.1673-4831.2016.05.005

生态与农村环境学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 716-723.doi: 10.11934/j.issn.1673-4831.2016.05.005

西南天然林保护工程区生态成效评估

陶蕴之¹, 吕一河², 李凤全¹, 胡健², 张琨², 李婷², 任艳姣²

1. 浙江师范大学地理与环境科学学院, 浙江金华 321004;
2. 中国科学院生态环境研究中心城市与区域生态国家重点实验室, 北京 100085

收稿日期:2016-02-29 出版日期:2016-09-25 发布日期:2016-10-08
通讯作者: 吕一河,E-mail:lyh@rcees.ac.cn E-mail:lyh@rcees.ac.cn
作者简介:陶蕴之(1990-),男,安徽淮南人,硕士,主要研究方向为自然保护区管理。E-mail:13511047624@163.com
基金资助:
中国科学院科技服务网络（STS）计划（KFJ-EW-STS-020-02-03）

Assessment of Ecological Effect of the Natural Forest Protection Project in Southwest China

TAO Yun-zhi¹, LV Yi-he², LI Feng-quan¹, HU Jian², ZHANG Kun², LI Ting², REN Yan-jiao²

1. College of Geography and Environmental Science, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Urban and Reginal Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environment Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China

Received:2016-02-29 Online:2016-09-25 Published:2016-10-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

随着大尺度生态保护和恢复工程的开展和不断深化，工程有效性评估逐渐成为备受关注的热点问题。开展大尺度生态保护和恢复的成效评估对于相应的宏观决策与管理具有重要科学意义。基于年均植被覆盖度、景观格局指数和人类威胁因子评估指标体系，对西南4省市天然林保护工程区的生态保护成效进行定量评估。结果表明：研究区生态保护成效总体上明显改善，地类景观斑块分布更加合理规整，连通性提高，人类干扰强度逐步减小，尤其是4省市交界林区以及重庆与湖北、四川与陕西、四川与三江源地区的交界区域生态成效显著提高；而汶川周边林区、横断山脉部分林区以及云南文山林区生态保护成效较弱。因此，在天然林保护工程的进一步实施过程中有必要在分析保护成效空间分异特征的基础上采取保护和恢复并重的策略，将植被、景观格局和生境质量与人类活动的干扰和压力综合起来，以促进大尺度生态保护和恢复的可持续有效管理。

关键词: 植被覆盖度, 景观格局指数, 人类威胁因子, 生态保护成效

Abstract:

With the development and continuous deepening of large-scale ecological protection and restoration projects, project effectiveness has become a hot issue arousing more and more attention. Assessment of the effectiveness of the large-scale ecological protection and restoration projects is of great scientific significance to correspondent macroscopic policy decision-making and management. The assessment of the effectiveness of the natural forest protection projects was conducted in four provinces, Southwest China, based on annual mean vegetation coverage, landscape index and the human threat factor assessment index system. Results show that the four projects, as a whole, are improving remarkably in effectiveness, with landscape patches distributed more reasonably and regularly to have better connectivity and less human disturbance. Especially the forest regions in the bordering areas between the four provinces or cities, like those between Chongqing and Hubei, between Sichuan and Shanxi, between Sichuan and Sanjiangyuan, have witnessed remarkable improvement in ecological effect. In the same time, the forest regions around Wenchuan, some in the Hengduanshan Mountains and the Wenshan forest region in Yunnan are not so lucky. Therefore in further implementation of the natural forest protection projects, it is necessary to adopt the strategy, designed on the basis of the feature of spatial variability of protection effectiveness, of emphasizing both protection and restoration simultaneously, so as to integrate the factors, such as vegetation, landscape pattern, habitat quality and disturbance and pressure of human activities, in promoting sustainable effective management of large-scale protection and restoration.

Key words: vegetation coverage, landscape index, human threat factor, ecological protection effectiveness

中图分类号:

X826
X171.4

陶蕴之, 吕一河, 李凤全, 胡健, 张琨, 李婷, 任艳姣. 西南天然林保护工程区生态成效评估[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(5): 716-723.

TAO Yun-zhi, LV Yi-he, LI Feng-quan, HU Jian, ZHANG Kun, LI Ting, REN Yan-jiao. Assessment of Ecological Effect of the Natural Forest Protection Project in Southwest China[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2016, 32(5): 716-723.

参考文献

[1] 蒋明康.中国自然保护区保护成效评估研究概述[J].生态与农村环境学报,2015,31(6):789-790.
[2] 张明亮,焦士兴.我国生态环境退化的问题分析及对策[J].国土与自然资源研究,2003(3):32-34.
[3] 李作洲,黄宏文,唐登奎,等.湖北后河国家级自然保护区生物多样性及其保护对策:Ⅱ.生物多样性保护现状、威胁及其对策[J].武汉植物学研究,2006,24(3):253-260.
[4] 刘国华,傅伯杰,陈利顶,等.中国生态退化的主要类型、特征及分布[J].生态学报,2000,20(1):13-19.
[5] 吴正.风沙地貌学[M].北京:科学出版社,1987:35-43.
[6] 殷贺,李正国,王仰麟,等.基于时间序列植被特征的内蒙古荒漠化评价[J].地理学报,2011,66(5):653-661.
[7] 郭柯,刘长成,董鸣.我国西南喀斯特植物生态适应性与石漠化治理[J].植物生态学报,2011,35(10):991-999.
[8] 章家恩,徐琪.生态退化研究的基本内容与框架[J].水土保持通报,1997,17(6):46-53.
[9] 蒋高明.退化生态系统的恢复与管理:兼论自然保护区在其中发挥的作用[J].植物学通报,2003,20(3):373-382.
[10] 胡聃,奚增均.生态恢复工程系统集成原理的一些理论分析[J].生态学报,2002,22(6):866-877.
[11] 张军驰.西部地区生态环境治理政策研究[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2012.
[12] 陈蓬.国外天然林保护概况及我国天然林保护的进展与对策[J].北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2004,3(2):50-54.
[13] 国家林业局天然林可持续经营保护考察团.澳大利亚、新西兰天然林保护管理对我国的启示[J].绿色中国,2005(10):57-59.
[14] 王维正.森林公园和公有林管理培训赴加拿大培训考察报告[C]//曲桂林.林业国际交流报告选编1997-1998.北京:中国林业出版社,2000:296-305.
[15] 章俊华,白林.日本自然公园的发展与概况[J].中国园林,2002,18(5):87-90.
[16] ERVIN J.Protected Area Assessments in Perspective[J].BioScience,2003,53(9):819-822.
[17] KREMEN C,CAMERON A,MOILANEN A,et al.Aligning Conservation Priorities Across Taxa in Madagascar With High-Resolution Planning Tools[J].Science,2008,320(5873):222-226.
[18] CHAPE S,HARRISON J,SPALDING M,et al.Measuring the Extent and Effectiveness of Protected Areas as an Indicator for Meeting Global Biodiversity Targets[J].Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B:Biological Sciences,2005,360(1454):443-455.
[19] RODRIGUES A S L,ANDELMAN S J,BAKARR M I,et al.Effectiveness of the Global Protected Area Network in Representing Species Diversity[J].Nature,2004,428(6983):640-643.
[20] HOCKINGS M.Systems for Assessing the Effectiveness of Management in Protected Areas[J].BioScience,2003,53(9):823-832.
[21] WADE A A,THEOBALD D M,LAITURI M J.A Multi-Scale Assessment of Local and Contextual Threats to Existing and Potential U.S.Protected Areas[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2011,101(3):215-227.
[22] 刘文兰,孙学刚,满自红,等.甘肃连城国家级自然保护区景观资源定量评价[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2009,44(4):92-98,113.
[23] 宋晓龙,李晓文,白军红,等.黄河三角洲国家级自然保护区生态敏感性评价[J].生态学报,2009,29(9):4836-4846.
[24] 王昆,白帆,黄利亚.长白山自然保护区保护效果评价[J].林业科学,2010,46(1):1-8.
[25] 周彬.西南林区天然林资源动态及恢复对策研究[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2011.
[26] 云南大学生态学与地植物学研究所,云南省环境保护局.云南省生态功能区划研究报告[R].昆明:[出版者不详],2004.
[27] 穆少杰,李建龙,陈奕兆,等.2001-2010年内蒙古植被覆盖度时空变化特征[J].地理学报,2012,67(9):1255-1268.
[28] 吴炳方,苑全治,颜长珍,等.21世纪前十年的中国土地覆盖变化[J].第四纪研究,2014,34(4):723-731.
[29] DYMOND J R,STEPHENS P R,NEWSOME P F,et al.Percentage Vegetation Cover of a Degrading Rangeland From SPOT[J].International Journal of Remote Sensing,1992,13(11):1999-2007.
[30] 潘晓玲.干旱区绿洲生态系统动态稳定性的初步研究[J].第四纪研究,2001,21(4):345-351.
[31] 张云霞,李晓兵,陈云浩.草地植被盖度的多尺度遥感与实地测量方法综述[J].地球科学进展,2003,18(1):85-93.
[32] 吴云.基于RS和GIS的植被覆盖度估算及动态变化分析[D].沈阳:辽宁工程技术大学,2009.
[33] SCHINDLER S,VON WEHRDEN H,POIRAZIDIS K,et al.Multiscale Performance of Landscape Metrics as Indicators of Species Richness of Plants,Insects and Vertebrates[J].Ecological Indicators,2013,31:41-48.
[34] LV Yi-he,ZHANG Li-wei,FENG Xiao-ming,et al.Recent Ecological Transitions in China:Greening,Browning,and Influential Factors[J].Scientific Reports,2015,5:8732.DOI:10.1038/srep08732.

西南天然林保护工程区生态成效评估

Assessment of Ecological Effect of the Natural Forest Protection Project in Southwest China

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	简钰清, 陈颖怡, 谢圆圆, 龚建周. 1980-2015年广东省乡村聚落的空间特征与演变[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(6): 698-706.
[2]	万华伟, 王永财, 侯鹏, 刘玉平, 李光一, 赵书慧. 2001-2016年中国生物多样性保护优先区域植被和水域动态监测与分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(3): 273-282.
[3]	李林叶, 田美荣, 梁会, 陈艳梅, 冯朝阳, 渠开跃, 钱金平. 2000-2016年呼伦贝尔草原植被覆盖度时空变化及其影响因素分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(7): 584-591.
[4]	张琨, 吕一河, 傅伯杰. 黄土高原典型区植被恢复及其对生态系统服务的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2017, 33(1): 23-31.
[5]	张东海, 任志远, 王晓峰, 白江涛, 刘宪锋, 冯雪铭. 基于MODIS的陕西黄土高原植被覆盖度变化特征及其驱动分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2013, 29(1): 29-35.