基于景观功能评价法(LFA)的5种恢复模式景观功能综合评价:以乌海市典型露天煤矿排土场为例

doi:10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2019.0814

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对矿区废弃地生态恢复效果的评价通常只考虑植被配置对土壤性质的改良，较少从景观角度对不同人工生态恢复模式进行评价和筛选。以乌海市露天煤矿排土场为研究区，选取5种典型恢复模式并以天然灌草群落的景观功能为恢复目标进行对比，运用并优化景观功能评价法（LFA）评价不同恢复模式下矿区排土场的斑块面积指标（A₁）、景观结构指标（A₂）及土壤稳定性（S_a）、渗透性（I_f）、养分循环（N_e）指数，通过最大方差法计算各指标权重得到景观结构功能综合评价指标（F_l）。结果表明：（1）生物结合工程措施的恢复模式比单一模式更好；（2）人工撒播草籽+砖砌框格护坡+土工网恢复模式A₁、A₂、S_a、I_f和N_e最高，是人工撒播草籽模式的3.2、1.8、1.8、1.7和2.4倍；（3）人工撒播草籽+砖砌框格护坡+土工网模式F_l最高，是其他恢复模式的1.3~1.9倍，是对照组的1.6倍，人工撒播草籽模式F_l最低，但与对照组相比差异不显著（P>0.05），说明5种恢复模式均能实现该区排土场生态恢复目标，以人工撒播草籽+砖砌框格护坡+土工网修复效果为最佳。研究结果可为筛选西北干旱荒漠区矿区生态恢复模式、促进环境可持续发展提供科学依据。

关键词: 景观功能评价法, 生态恢复模式, 露天煤矿排土场, 乌海市

Abstract: The evaluation of ecological restoration effects of abandoned land in a mining area usually only considers improvement in soil properties by vegetation allocation while few studies have focused on the evaluation and screening of different artificial ecological restoration models from a landscape perspective. Taking the dumping site of the Wuhai open-pit coal mine as a study area, 5 typical recovery modes were selected and the landscape functions of natural shrub communities were used as recovery targets for comparison. The landscape function analysis (LFA) method was adapted and used to evaluate the patch area index (A₁), the landscape structure index (A₂), soil stability (S_a), infiltration (I_f) and the nutrient cycle (N_e) index of the dumping site under different recovery modes, and the weight of each index was calculated by the maximum variance method to obtain the comprehensive evaluation index of the landscape structure function (F_l). The results show the following. (1) The recovery mode of bio-integrated engineering measures is superior to a single mode. (2) Under the mode of artificial grass seed application combined with brick sash slope protection and geonet recovery, the A₁, A₂, S_a, I_f, and N_e reached to the highest values that were 3.2, 1.8, 1.8, 1.7, and 2.4 times as high as those values obtained from artificial grass seed application mode. (3) The value of F_l was the highest under the recovery mode involving artificial grass seed application combined with brick sash slope protection and geonet which is 1.3-1.9 times as high as the values of other recovery modes and 1.6 times as those of the control group. F_l was the lowest under the artificial grass seed application mode, but with no significant difference to that of the control group (P>0.05). Therefore, all the 5 recovery modes can be helpful to achieve the ecological restoration goals of the dump site in this area, and it is best to artificially distribute grass seeds alongside brick sash slope protection and geonet. The results of this research can provide a scientific basis for screening the ecological restoration modes of mining areas in arid desert areas of north-western China and to promote sustainable development.

Key words: landscape function, ecological restoration mode, open pit coal mine dump, Wuhai City

中图分类号:

张昕, 郭小平, 李鹏飞, 冯昶栋, 郭光. 基于景观功能评价法(LFA)的5种恢复模式景观功能综合评价:以乌海市典型露天煤矿排土场为例[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2020, 36(7): 897-904.

ZHANG Xin, GUO Xiao-ping, LI Peng-fei, FENG Chang-dong, GUO Guang. Comprehensive Evaluation of Landscape Functions of 5 Restoration Modes Based on the LFA Method: A Case Study of the Dumping Site of a Typical Open-pit Coal Mine in the City of Wuhai.[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2020, 36(7): 897-904.

参考文献

[1] 卞正富,沈渭寿.西部重点矿区土地退化因素调查[J].生态与农村环境学报,2016,32(2):173-177.[BIAN Zheng-fu,SHEN Wei-shou.Driving Factors of Land Degradation in Major Mining Areas in West China[J].Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment,2016,32(2):173-177.]
[2] 郭建英,何京丽,李锦荣,等.典型草原大型露天煤矿排土场边坡水蚀控制效果[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(3):296-303.[GUO Jian-ying,HE Jing-li,LI Jin-rong,et al.Effects of Different Measures on Water Erosion Control of Dump Slope at Opencast Coal Mine in Typical Steppe[J].Transactions of the CSAE,2015,31(3):296-303.]
[3] 黄鑫,曹学章,张明,等.基于最小累积阻力模型的内蒙古胜利煤田景观生态安全格局构建[J].生态与农村环境学报,2019,35(1):55-62.[HUANG Xin,CAO Xue-zhang,ZHANG Ming,et al.Construction of Landscape Ecological Security Pattern of Shengli Coalfield in Inner Mongolia Based on the Minimum Cumulative Resistance Model[J].Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment,2019,35(1):55-62.]
[4] 吴钢,魏东,周政达,等.我国大型煤炭基地建设的生态恢复技术研究综述[J].生态学报,2014,34(11):2812-2820.[WU Gang,WEI Dong,ZHOU Zheng-da,et al.A Summary of Study on Ecological Restoration Technology of Large Coal Bases Construction in China[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2014,34(11):2812-2820.]
[5] 刘海龙.采矿废弃地的生态恢复与可持续景观设计[J].生态学报,2004,24(2):323-329.[LIU Hai-long.Ecological Restoration and Sustainable Landscape Design of Mining Wastelands[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2004,24(2):323-329.]
[6] 马真臻,王忠静,顾艳玲,等.中国西北干旱区自然保护区生态脆弱性评价:以甘肃西湖、苏干湖自然保护区为例[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(1):253-259.[MA Zhen-zhen,WANG Zhong-jing,GU Yan-ling,et al.Ecological Vulnerability Assessment of Nature Reserve in Arid Region of Northwest China:A Case Study of the Xihu Nature Reserve and the Suganhu Nature Reserve in Gansu[J].Journal of Desert Research,2015,35(1):253-259.]
[7] BURTON C M,BURTON P J,HEBDA R,et al.Determining the Optimal Sowing Density for a Mixture of Native Plants Used to Revegetate Degraded Ecosystems[J].Restoration Ecology,2006,14(3):379-390.
[8] 张绍良,米家鑫,侯湖平,等.矿山生态恢复研究进展:基于连续三届的世界生态恢复大会报告[J].生态学报,2018,38(15):5611-5619.
[9] 徐程,谷峰,王瑶,等.土壤团聚体和水分动态在3种植被覆盖下的关系[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(1):68-74.[XU Cheng,GU Feng,WANG Yao,et al.Study on the Relationships Between Soil Aggregate and Water Dynamics Under Three Vegetation Cover[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,33(1):68-74.]
[10] 珊丹,邢恩德,荣浩,等.草原矿区排土场不同植被配置类型生态恢复[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(2):336-342.[SHAN Dan,XING En-de,RONG Hao,et al.Ecological Restoration of Different Vegetation Collocations of Coal Mine Dump in Typical Steppe[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,2019,38(2):336-342.]
[11] 黄雨晗,况欣宇,曹银贵,等.草原露天矿区复垦地与未损毁地土壤物理性质对比[J].生态与农村环境学报,2019,35(7):940-946.[HUANG Yu-han,KUANG Xin-yu,CAO Yin-gui,et al.Comparison of Soil Physical Properties Between Reclaimed Land and Undamaged Land in Grassland Opencast Mining Area[J].Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment,2019,35(7):940-946.]
[12] 李叶鑫,吕刚,王道涵,等.露天煤矿排土场复垦区不同植被类型土壤质量评价[J].生态环境学报,2019,28(4):850-856.[LI Ye-xin,LÜ Gang,WANG Dao-han,et al.Soil Quality Evaluation With Different Vegetation Types of Reclamation Area in a Surface Coal Mine Dump[J].Ecology and Environmental Sciences,2019,28(4):850-856.]
[13] 张斌,张清明.国内生态恢复效益评价研究简评[J].中国水土保持,2009(6):8-9,54.
[14] 张成梁,黄艺.LFA的引进简介[J].山西林业科技,2008,37(2):44-47.
[15] MUNRO N T,FISCHER J,WOOD J,et al.Assessing Ecosystem Function of Restoration Plantings in South-eastern Australia[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2012,282:36-45.
[16] MAHMOUD A M A,HASMADI I M,ALIAS M S,et al.Reviews of Landscape Function Analysis (LFA) Applications in Rangeland Ecosystems and Its Links With Vegetation Indices (VI's)[J].World Applied Sciences Journal,2014,32(5):986-991.
[17] FURNISS D G.Can Indices of Landscape Function Analysis (LFA) Be Derived From Ground-based Spectroscopy? A Case Study From Gold Mines on the Highveld of South Africa[D]. Johannesburg,South Africa:University of the Witwatersrand,2008.
[18] 赵娟,李新平,贾黎明.LFA方法在晋东采煤区景观结构及功能评价中的应用[J].北京林业大学学报,2016,38(6):79-86.[ZHAO Juan,LI Xin-ping,JIA Li-ming.Application of LFA Method to Quantitative Monitoring and Assessment of Vegetation Degradation in Mining Area of Eastern Shanxi[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2016,38(6):79-86.]
[19] 张波,张建军.LFA方法在晋西黄土区植被景观功能评价中的应用[J].中国水土保持科学,2010,8(2):85-90.[ZHANG Bo,ZHANG Jian-jun.Application of LFA Method to Landscape Function Assessment of Vegetation in Western Shanxi Loess Plateau[J].Science of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,8(2):85-90.]
[20] 魏忠义,王云凤,李晓雷,等.露天矿区景观恢复与整治措施探讨[J].金属矿山,2012(1):144-146,150.[WEI Zhong-yi,WANG Yun-feng,LI Xiao-lei,et al.Discussion on the Technical Measures of Landscape Restoration in Open Pit Mine[J].Metal Mine,2012(1):144-146,150.]
[21] TONGWAY D J,HINDLEY N L.Landscape Function Analysis:Procedures for Monitoring and Assessing Landscapes With Special Reference to Minesites and Rangelands[M].Canberra:CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems,2004.
[22] 赵新风,徐海量,王希义,等.人工措施对阿尔泰山采金矿区地表的恢复作用[J].生态学杂志,2018,37(6):1628-1635.[ZHAO Xin-feng,XU Hai-liang,WANG Xi-yi,et al.Effects of Artificial Measures on Surface Recovery of Gold Mining Area in Altai Mountain[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,2018,37(6):1628-1635.]
[23] 吕刚,肖鹏,李叶鑫,等.海州露天煤矿排土场不同复垦模式下表层土壤团聚体的稳定性[J].中国水土保持科学,2018,16(5):77-84.[LÜ Gang,XIAO Peng,LI Ye-xin,et al.Stability of Topsoil Aggregates Under Different Reclamation Modes in the Dump of Haizhou Opencast Coal Mine[J].Science of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,16(5):77-84.]
[24] 齐雁冰,常庆瑞,田康,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区不同植被恢复模式土壤无机磷形态分布特征[J].农业环境科学学报,2013,32(1):56-62.[QI Yan-bing,CHANG Qing-rui,TIAN Kang,et al.Inorganic Phosphorus Fractions Distribution in Different Vegetation Restoration in Gully Region of Loess Plateau[J].Journal of Agro-Environment Science,2013,32(1):56-62.]
[25] 李伟.露天煤矿排土场边坡稳定性分析与治理技术[J].煤炭科学技术,2014,42(10):37-40,5.[LI Wei.Treatment Technology and Stability Analysis of Dump Slope in Open Mine[J].Coal Science and Technology,2014,42(10):37-40,5.]