Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment ›› 2014, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 90-95.doi:

• muci • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Biodiversity Risk Assessment: Methods and Case Study

DING  Hui, XU  Hai-Gen, WU  Yi, CAO  Ming-Chang, LEI  Jun-Cheng, YANG  Yun-Fang   

  1. Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences,Ministry of Environmental Protection
  • Received:2013-05-13 Revised:2014-01-05 Online:2014-01-25 Published:2014-02-14

Abstract: Attempts were made to define biodiversity risks, analyze their sources, work out principles and hierarchy for establishment of a biodiversity risk assessment index system and then to build up the system. Biodiversity risk assessment was performed of 2376 county-level administrative units, all over China. Results show that generally R (risk value) varies in the range between 0.0059 and 0.8283, and is less than 0.3 in most areas. High risk areas are located mostly in Guangxi, Yunnan, Sichuan, etc., with R being higher than 0.3291, while low risk areas are distributed mainly in Inner Mongolia, Shanxi, Shaanxi, etc., with R being lower than 0.0568, and moderate risk areas in Northeast China and North China. In the areas, the most abundant in biodiversity (TS≥0.2958), there are still 38 county-level units moderate in R, owing mainly to the greater area of nature reserves and smaller pressure, with average ER being 0.2906, and average RP being 0.1423.  However, in the areas, the poorest in biodiversity (TS≤0.0502), although there are 22 units with RP being quite high and with 0.4704 on average and 145 units that do not have any nature reserve, while as a whole their R are not so high, with average being 0.0570 and 0.0481, respectively.

Key words: risk of biodiversity, risk assessment, biodiversity management

CLC Number: