生态与农村环境学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (10): 1282-1289.doi: 10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2022.0142

• 生态城市建设与碳中和专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于降温效应的长三角核心城市城区绿地节能减碳价值研究

仇宽彪, 杜涵蓓, 张龙江, 张卫东, 李海东   

  1. 生态环境部南京环境科学研究所, 江苏 南京 210042
  • 收稿日期:2022-02-25 出版日期:2022-10-25 发布日期:2022-10-22
  • 通讯作者: 张卫东,E-mail:zwd@nies.org E-mail:zwd@nies.org
  • 作者简介:仇宽彪(1986-),男,江苏镇江人,高级工程师,博士,主要从事城市景观生态研究。E-mail:qiukuanbiao@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务专项(GYZX210101)

Study on the Carbon Saving Value of Urban Greenspace Patches in the Main Cities of Yangtze River Delta Based on the Cooling Effect

QIU Kuan-biao, DU Han-bei, ZHANG Long-jiang, ZHANG Wei-dong, LI Hai-dong   

  1. Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing 210042, China
  • Received:2022-02-25 Online:2022-10-25 Published:2022-10-22

摘要: 基于城市绿地的降温效应这一重要的生态功能,结合遥感影像,采用缓冲区分析及统计分析方法,对长三角一体化中心区27个核心城市的城区绿地的节能减碳量进行估算研究。结果显示,研究区各大城市的中心城区绿地均具有显著的降温效应。城区绿地斑块的平均地表温度(LST)较城区平均低2.18 K,降温幅度在2.9~8.3 K之间,绿地斑块的降温距离则在270~450 m之间。长三角一体化核心区27个核心城市绿地节能减碳量为267 656.12 t·d-1,每个城市绿地平均节能减碳量约9 913.19 t·d-1。各大城市中,上海市城市绿地节能减碳量最大,达47 374.83 t·d-1,其余依次为温州、宁波、南京、杭州、台州、苏州、无锡和合肥,宣城、绍兴、嘉兴、池州、马鞍山和安庆等市城市绿地节能减碳量均在2 000 t·d-1以下。此外,随着到绿地距离增加,城区绿地节能减碳量从0~90 m范围内的3 562.54 t·d-1逐渐减少到>180~270 m范围内的54.20 t·d-1。研究结论可为城市生态建设、城市碳达峰碳中和研究提供科学参考。

关键词: 降温效应, 节能减碳, 城市绿地, 长三角

Abstract: The vegetation carbon sink has been estimated from the absorption and storage of CO2 through photosynthesis. However, due to its ecological functions such as the local cool island effect of the urban greenspace, little attention has been paid to the energy saving and carbon reduction, and there is a lack of estimation of carbon saving amount in regional cities. Based on the important ecological function of cooling effect of urban green space, this study used buffer analysis and statistical analysis methods to analyze the carbon saving of urban greenspace in 27 core cities in the integrated central area of the Yangtze River Delta (CCICAYRD). Results show that the urban greenspace in the downtown of CCICAYRD had a significant cooling effect. The average LST of urban greenspace was 2.18 K, lower than that of the downtown, and the cooling range was between 2.9 and 8.3 K, and the cooling distance of greenspace patches was between 270 and 450 m. The carbon saving estimation show that the total carbon saving of the 27 core cities in the CCICAYRD was approximately 267 656.12 t·d-1, with an average carbon saving of 9 913.19 t·d-1 per city. Among the major cities, the carbon saving of urban greenspace in Shanghai downtown was the largest, reached to 47 374.83 t·d-1, followed by Wenzhou, Ningbo, Nanjing, Hangzhou, Tāizhou, Suzhou, Wuxi and Hefei, while the carbon saving of urban greenspace patches was small in Xuancheng, Shaoxing, Jiaxing, Chizhou, Ma'anshan and Anqing, all below 2 000 t·d-1. In addition, as the distance to the greenspace patches increased, the carbon saving of the urban greenspace gradually decreased from 3 562.54 t·d-1 in the cooling distance of 0-90 m to 54.20 t·d-1 in the cooling distance of >180-270 m. This conclusion can provide a scientific reference for the urban ecological construction and the researches on urban carbon peaking and neutrality.

Key words: cooling effect, energy saving and carbon reduction, urban greenspace patches, Yangtze-River Delta

中图分类号: