太湖水土界面氮磷释放通量的流动培养研究

doi:CNKI:SUN:NCST.0.2009-04-013

生态与农村环境学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (4): 66-71.doi: CNKI:SUN:NCST.0.2009-04-013

太湖水土界面氮磷释放通量的流动培养研究

徐徽, 张路, 商景阁, 代静玉, 范成新

南京农业大学资源与环境科学学院

收稿日期:2009-02-16 出版日期:2009-10-25 发布日期:2011-04-08
通讯作者: 张路中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所 E-mail:luzhang@niglas.ac.cn
作者简介:徐徽(1983－)，女，安徽安庆人，硕士，主要研究方向为湖泊营养盐交换及氮循环。E-mail:xh831030@sohu.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目(40730528);国家自然科学基金(40501064)

Study on Ammonium and Phosphate Fluxes at the Sediment-Water Interface of Lake Taihu Using Flow-Through Incubation

XU Hui, ZHANG Lu, SHANG Jing-Ge, DAI Jing-Yu, FAN Cheng-Xin

College of Resources and Environmental Sciences,Nanjing Agricultural University

Received:2009-02-16 Online:2009-10-25 Published:2011-04-08
Contact: ZHANG Lu Nanjing Institute of Geography & Limnology,Chinese Academy of Sciences E-mail:luzhang@niglas.ac.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 运用一种新的水土界面释放通量研究方法——流动培养法,对太湖不同湖区不同季节条件下水土界面氮磷释放通量进行研究。结果表明,太湖水体沉积物是其上覆水体氮磷的内源,不同湖区间铵态氮、磷酸盐交换速率差异显著,其中,受入湖河道污染输入影响较大的梅梁湾北部、竺山湾、西部沿岸带湖区铵态氮释放速率[(103.35±13.17)mg·m^-2·d^-1]显著高于太湖其他湖区[(11.87±12.03)mg·m^-2·d^-1]。磷酸盐空间释放规律与铵态氮相似,但释放的高值还出现在西南沿岸带、贡湖湾和东太湖。与静态培养方式下获得的结果相同,流动培养方式下梅梁湾铵态氮和磷酸盐释放速率也表现出季节性和空间差异,即夏季水土界面氮磷释放速率高于春、秋季,且污染严重湖区的释放速率高于其他湖区。由于流动培养的气密性减少了上覆水铵态氮以NH3的形式挥发,使得铵态氮释放速率高于敞口的静态培养方式;而就非挥发性磷酸盐释放速率而言,2种培养方式下得到的结果基本一致。

关键词: 太湖, 沉积物, 铵态氮, 磷酸盐, 释放速率

Abstract: A study was carried out on seasonal variation of ammonium and phosphate release at the sediment-water interface in Lake Taihu,and particularly in Meiliang Bay,using a novel technology of flow-through incubation.Results show that ammonium and phosphate release at the sediment-water interface in Lake Taihu was characterized mostly by its endogenousness,despite of the obvious spatial variation of ammonium and phosphate fluxes from site to site in the lake zones.Due to the pollution input of inflow rivers,the ammonium fluxes in the north of Meiliang Bay,Zhushan Bay and the off-shore area in the west of Lake Taihu [Mean±SD:(103.35±13.17) mg·m^-2·d^-1] were greater than those in other lake zones [(11.87±12.03) mg·m^-2·d^-1].A similar trend was observed with phosphate flux,and in addition,high fluxes were also monitored in Gonghu Bay,East Lake Taihu and off-shore area of the southwest of Lake Taihu.Similar to what was found in a static incubation system,the ammonium and phosphate fluxes measured in the flow-through incubation system at Meiliang Bay also demonstrated seasonal and spatial variations,i.e.higher in summer than in spring and autumn and in more polluted lake zones than in others.Because of the airtight design of the flow-through incubation system,volatilization of ammonia from overlying water was negligible,as compared to the open-top mode of the static incubation system.So the ammonium flux in the flow-through incubation system was much higher than that in the static incubation system,while phosphate fluxes were more or less the same due to its nonvolatility.

Key words: Lake Taihu, sediment, ammonium, phosphate, flux

中图分类号:

X524

徐徽, 张路, 商景阁, 代静玉, 范成新. 太湖水土界面氮磷释放通量的流动培养研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2009, 25(4): 66-71.

XU Hui, ZHANG Lu, SHANG Jing-Ge, DAI Jing-Yu, FAN Cheng-Xin. Study on Ammonium and Phosphate Fluxes at the Sediment-Water Interface of Lake Taihu Using Flow-Through Incubation[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2009, 25(4): 66-71.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: http://www.ere.ac.cn/CN/CNKI:SUN:NCST.0.2009-04-013

http://www.ere.ac.cn/CN/Y2009/V25/I4/66

[1]	常会庆, 朱晓辉, 郑彩杰, 焦常锋, 王启震, 吴杰. 颗粒无烟煤活性炭去除水体中低浓度磷酸盐研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(8): 1058-1063.
[2]	马舒欣, 乔永民, 唐梦瑶, 杨洪允. 广州市主要湖泊沉积物重金属污染与生态风险评价[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(5): 600-607.
[3]	孙笑蕾, 胡正义, 刘莉, 李松炎, 刘福来. 基于肥水资源化的河网区镇域农业面源污染控制系统的构建：以太湖地区新建镇为例[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(5): 582-592.
[4]	王一楷, 李振国, 陈志彪. 太湖西部沉积物磷形态剖面分布和成因分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(4): 426-432.
[5]	董旭辉, 徐敏, 林媚珍, 李燕, 羊向东. 沉积记录揭示的湖泊长期生态系统服务权衡/协同机制:进展、案例剖析与展望[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(1): 28-37.
[6]	陈晶, 张毅敏, 杨飞, 孔明, 张志伟, 巴翠翠, 尹杰. 基于核磁共振技术的滆湖沉积物有机磷垂直分布特征[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(9): 850-856.
[7]	田斌, 王萌, 陈环宇, 梁翠, 龚双姣, 马陶武. 活性污泥生物炭对沉积物中镉生态毒性的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(2): 161-168.
[8]	陈垚, 甘春娟, 张彩, 袁绍春, 朱子奇. 城市雨水塘生态风险评价方法[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(12): 1064-1073.
[9]	康占军, 卢新哲, 林楠, 谷安庆. 浙江省海盐县河流水体表层沉积物重金属生态风险评价[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(12): 1096-1104.
[10]	潘颖, 林杰, 佟光臣, 唐鹏, 张金池, 顾哲衍. 2004-2014年太湖流域植被覆盖时空变化特征[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(1): 37-45.
[11]	方斌斌, 于洋, 姜伟立, 常闻捷, 杜明勇, 张民. 太湖流域水体和沉积物重金属时空分布特征及潜在生态风险评价[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2017, 33(3): 215-224.
[12]	刘俊, 朱允华, 胡劲松, 彭国文, 谢红艳, 李志良, 彭翠英. 湘江中游江段沉积物重金属污染特征及生态风险评价[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2017, 33(2): 135-141.
[13]	薛银刚, 江晓栋, 孙萌, 刘菲, 滕加泉, 耿金菊, 谢文理, 张皓. 基于高通量测序的冬季太湖竺山湾浮游细菌和沉积物细菌群落结构和多样性研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2017, 33(11): 992-1000.
[14]	李少华, 王学全, 兰岚, 高琪, 杨占武. 青海湖流域主要河口区沉积物中重金属元素生态风险评价[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(6): 940-945.
[15]	王琪飞, 顾佳茹, 徐德福, 李鑫, 李映雪, 张玉. 动物扰动对湿地植物根区有机碳和氮形态的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(5): 813-817.

太湖水土界面氮磷释放通量的流动培养研究

Study on Ammonium and Phosphate Fluxes at the Sediment-Water Interface of Lake Taihu Using Flow-Through Incubation

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价