基于能值分析的天宝岩泥炭沼泽生态系统服务价值评估

doi:10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2022.0874

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探索泥炭沼泽生态系统服务功能价值,以福建天宝岩国家级自然保护区水竹(Phyllostachys heteroclada)沼泽、垂穗石松(Palhinhaea cernua)沼泽、灯芯草(Juncus effusus)沼泽和泥炭藓(Sphagnum magellanicum)沼泽4种典型泥炭沼泽生态系统为研究对象,应用能值理论,构建了泥炭沼泽生态系统服务价值评价体系,评估天宝岩不同类型泥炭沼泽生态系统服务价值。结果表明:(1)泥炭沼泽生态系统服务总能值为1.01×10¹⁹ sej·a^-1,宏观经济价值约为9.99×10⁶元·a^-1,其中直接服务能值为5.45×10¹⁷ sej·a^-1,经济价值为5.36×10⁵元·a^-1;间接服务能值为2.73×10¹⁸ sej·a^-1,经济价值为2.69×10⁶元·a^-1;存在服务能值为6.86×10¹⁸ sej·a^-1,经济价值为6.76×10⁶元·a^-1;(2)单位面积泥炭沼泽生态系统服务价值大小顺序为泥炭藓沼泽＞灯芯草沼泽＞垂穗石松沼泽＞水竹沼泽;(3)各项服务功能价值大小顺序为文化科研(60.28%)＞净化水质(27.03%)＞维持生物多样性(6.65%)＞增加生物量(4.27%)＞增加NPP(0.81%)＞涵养水源(0.74%)＞储蓄泥炭(0.39%)＞固碳释氧(0.16%)。研究结果可为泥炭沼泽湿地生态补偿与差异化保护提供理论支撑。

关键词: 能值分析, 泥炭沼泽生态系统, 服务功能, 评估, 天宝岩国家级自然保护区

Abstract: To assess the values of ecosystem services provided by peat swamp habitats, four typical peat swamp ecosystems (Phyllostachys heteroclada peat swamp, Palhinhaea cernua peat swamp, Juncus effusus peat swamp, and Sphagnum magellanicum peat swamp) were selected in the Tianbaoyan National Nature Reserve (TNNR) in Fujian Province. Using the emergy theory, an evaluation system for the peat swamp ecosystem service values was established, and the service values of the different types of peat swamp ecosystems in TNNR were assessed. The results show that: (1) The total emergy of peat swamp ecosystem services in TNNR was 1.01×10¹⁹ sej·a^-1, with a macroeconomic value of 9.99×10⁶ yuan·a^-1. The direct service emergy value was 5.45×10¹⁷ sej·a^-1, worth 5.36×10⁵ yuan·a^-1; the indirect service emergy value was 2.73×10¹⁸ sej·a^-1, worth 2.69×10⁶ yuan·a^-1; the existing service emergy value was 6.86×10¹⁸ sej·a^-1, worth 6.76×10⁶ yuan·a^-1. (2) The order of peat swamp ecosystem service value per unit area was Sphagnum magellanicum peat swamp > Juncus effusus peat swamp > Palhinhaea cernua peat swamp > Phyllostachys heteroclada peat swamp. (3) The order of the value of each service function was culture & research (60.28%) > water purification (27.03%) > biodiversity maintenance (6.65%) > biomass increase (4.27%) > NPP increase (0.81%) > water conservation (0.74%) > peat storage (0.39%) > carbon fixation and oxygen release (0.16%). These findings provide theoretical support for the ecological compensation and differentiated protection of peat swamp wetlands.

Key words: emergy analysis, peat swamp ecosystem, service function, assessment, Tianbaoyan National Nature Reserve

中图分类号:

X171.1

严雨桐, 陈花丹, 游巍斌, 刘进山, 蔡昌棠, 何东进. 基于能值分析的天宝岩泥炭沼泽生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2023, 39(3): 335-343.

YAN Yu-tong, CHEN Hua-dan, YOU Wei-bin, LIU Jin-shan, CAI Chang-tang, HE Dong-jin. Assessment of Ecosystem Service Values of Peat Swamp in Tianbaoyan National Nature Reserve by Using Emergy Analysis[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2023, 39(3): 335-343.

参考文献 33

[1]	邓思宇,陈袁波,余珂,等.不同类型泥炭沼泽湿地无机离子、溶解有机质的变化特征及生态学意义[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(2):571-580.[DENG Si-yu,CHEN Yuan-bo,YU Ke,et al.Variations of Inorganic Ions and Dissolved Organic Matter in Different Types of Peat Bogs and Its Ecological Significance[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2021,32(2):571-580.]
[2]	辛悦,邹彩瑜,王磊,等.崇明东滩互花米草资源化利用生态工程系统生态经济评价[J].生态与农村环境学报,2021,37(11):1394-1403.[XIN Yue,ZOU Cai-yu,WANG Lei,et al.The Evaluation of an Ecological Engineering System for the Utilization of Spartina alterniflora in Chongming Dongtan[J].Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment,2021,37(11):1394-1403.]
[3]	杨玲,孔范龙,郗敏,等.基于Meta分析的青岛市湿地生态系统服务价值评估[J].生态学杂志,2017,36(4):1038-1046.[YANG Ling,KONG Fan-long,XI Min,et al.Ecosystem Services Assessment of Wetlands in Qingdao Based on Meta-analysis[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,2017,36(4):1038-1046.]
[4]	赵欣,张杰,钟林东.黑龙江丰林国家级自然保护区生态系统服务价值评估与分析[J].北京林业大学学报,2021,43(7):100-110.[ZHAO Xin,ZHANG Jie,ZHONG Lin-dong.Evaluation and Analysis on Ecosystem Service Value of Fenglin National Nature Reserve in Heilongjiang Province of Northeastern China[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2021,43(7):100-110.]
[5]	宫晓琳,赵冰,弓弼,等.陕西省湿地生态系统服务价值初步评估[J].湿地科学,2017,15(6):871-874.[GONG Xiao-lin,ZHAO Bing,GONG Bi,et al.Preliminary Assessment of Wetland Ecosystem Services in Shaanxi Province[J].Wetland Science,2017,15(6):871-874.]
[6]	MULATU D W,AHMED J,SEMEREAB E,et al.Stakeholders,Institutional Challenges and the Valuation of Wetland Ecosystem Services in South Sudan:The Case of Machar Marshes and Sudd Wetlands[J].Environmental Management,2022,69(4):666-683.
[7]	RICAURTE L F,OLAYA-RODRÍGUEZ M H,CEPEDA-VALENCIA J,et al.Future Impacts of Drivers of Change on Wetland Ecosystem Services in Colombia[J].Global Environmental Change,2017,44:158-169.
[8]	殷楠,王帅,刘焱序.生态系统服务价值评估:研究进展与展望[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(1):233-244.[YIN Nan,WANG Shuai,LIU Yan-xu.Ecosystem Service Value Assessment:Research Progress and Prospects[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,2021,40(1):233-244.]
[9]	马程,王晓玥,张雅昕,等.北京市生态涵养区生态系统服务供给与流动的能值分析[J].地理学报,2017,72(6):974-985.[MA Cheng,WANG Xiao-yue,ZHANG Ya-xin,et al.Emergy Analysis of Ecosystem Services Supply and Flow in Beijing Ecological Conservation Area[J].Acta Geographica Sinica,2017,72(6):974-985.]
[10]	周淑梅,韩景元,刘力军.基于相图法的河北省农业生态经济系统可持续发展对策研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2018,34(12):1074-1081.[ZHOU Shu-mei,HAN Jing-yuan,LIU Li-jun.Countermeasures of Sustainable Development for Agricultural Eco-economic System in Hebei Province Based on Ternary Diagram[J].Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment,2018,34(12):1074-1081.]
[11]	孙晓瑞,税伟,郑佳瑜,等.基于能值分析的厦门城市代谢可持续性评估[J].生态学报,2021,41(11):4342-4353.[SUN Xiao-rui,SHUI Wei,ZHENG Jia-yu,et al.Evaluation of Metabolic Sustainability in Xiamen Based on Emergy Analysis[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2021,41(11):4342-4353.]
[12]	李宁,潘辉,李颖,等.天宝岩4种湿地植被泥炭对Pb2+的吸附特征[J].森林与环境学报,2021,41(5):449-455.[LI Ning,PAN Hui,LI Ying,et al.Adsorption Characteristics of Pb2+ on Peat of Four Wetland Vegetation Types in the Tianbaoyan National Nature Reserve of Fujian[J].Journal of Forest and Environment,2021,41(5):449-455.]
[13]	简立燕,肖石红,张中瑞,等.天宝岩国家级自然保护区4种泥炭沼泽湿地持水特性[J].四川农业大学学报,2016,34(4):414-419,425.[JIAN Li-yan,XIAO Shi-hong,ZHANG Zhong-rui,et al.Water-holding Capacity of Four Different Types of Sphagnum Wetlands in the Tianbaoyan National Nature Reserve[J].Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University,2016,34(4):414-419,425.]
[14]	肖石红,张中瑞,覃德华,等.天宝岩国家级自然保护区4种类型泥炭藓沼泽植被组成及其与环境因子的关系[J].应用与环境生物学报,2016,22(4):631-638.[XIAO Shi-hong,ZHANG Zhong-rui,QIN De-hua,et al.Community Composition of Four Types of Sphagnum Wetlands and Its Relationship with Environmental Factors in Tianbaoyan National Nature Reserve[J].Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology,2016,22(4):631-638.]
[15]	孙洁斐.基于能值分析的武夷山自然保护区生态系统服务功能价值评估[D].福州:福建农林大学,2008.[SUN Jie-fei.Evaluation of Ecosystem Service Value of Wuyishan Nature Reserve Based on the Emergy Anaylsis[D].Fuzhou:Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,2008.]
[16]	蓝盛芳,钦佩,陆宏芳.生态经济系统能值分析[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2002:404-408.[LAN Sheng-fang,QIN Pei,LU Hong-fang.Emergy Analysis of Eco-economic System[M].Beijing:Chemical Industry Press,2002:404-408.]
[17]	张虹,黄民生,胡晓辉.基于能值分析的福建省绿色GDP核算[J].地理学报,2010,65(11):1421-1428.[ZHANG Hong,HUANG Min-sheng,HU Xiao-hui.Green GDP Calculation of Fujian Province Based on Energy Analysis[J].Acta Geographica Sinica,2010,65(11):1421-1428.]
[18]	ODUM H T.Environmental Accounting:Emergy and Environmental Decision Making[M].New York:Wiley,1996:1-380.
[19]	MEILLAUD F,GAY J B,BROWN M T.Evaluation of a Building Using the Emergy Method[J].Solar Energy,2005,79(2):204-212.
[20]	WONG C P,JIANG B,KINZIG A P,et al.Linking Ecosystem Characteristics to Final Ecosystem Services for Public Policy[J].Ecology Letters,2015,18(1):108-118.
[21]	LANGAN C,FARMER J,RIVINGTON M,et al.Tropical Wetland Ecosystem Service Assessments in East Africa:A Review of Approaches and Challenges[J].Environmental Modelling & Software,2018,102:260-273.
[22]	刘耕源,杨青.生态系统服务价值非货币量核算:理论框架与方法学[J].中国环境管理,2018,10(4):10-20.[LIU Geng-yuan,YANG Qing.Non-monetary Accounting on Ecosystem Services Valuation:Theory and Methodology[J].Chinese Journal of Environmental Management,2018,10(4):10-20.]
[23]	杨青,刘耕源.湿地生态系统服务价值能值评估:以珠江三角洲城市群为例[J].环境科学学报,2018,38(11):4527-4538.[YANG Qing,LIU Geng-yuan.Wetland Ecosystem Services Assessment Based on Emergy:A Case of Pearl River Delta Urban Agglomeration[J].Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae,2018,38(11):4527-4538.]
[24]	屈凡柱,孟灵,于君宝,等.黄河三角洲不同生境下芦苇磷的累积和分配过程[J].环境科学学报,2022,42(1):47-55.[QU Fan-zhu,MENG Ling,YU Jun-bao,et al.Study on Processes of P Accumulation and Allocation of Phragmites australis in Coastal Wetlands in the Yellow River Delta[J].Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae,2022,42(1):47-55.]
[25]	刘耕源,刘畅,杨青.基于能值的海洋生态系统服务核算方法构建及应用[J].资源与产业,2021,23(1):20-34.[LIU Geng-yuan,LIU Chang,YANG Qing.Estimation Method Construction and Application of Oceanic Ecosystem Services Based on Energy Values[J].Resources & Industries,2021,23(1):20-34.]
[26]	魏强,佟连军,杨丽花,等.三江平原湿地生态系统生物多样性保护价值[J].生态学报,2015,35(4):935-943.[WEI Qiang,TONG Lian-jun,YANG Li-hua,et al.The Biodiversity Conservation Value of Wetland Ecosystem in the Sanjiang Plain[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2015,35(4):935-943.]
[27]	BROWN M T,ULGIATI S.Emergy Assessment of Global Renewable Sources[J].Ecological Modelling,2016,339:148-156.
[28]	宋文彬,张翼然,张玲,等.洪河国家级自然保护区沼泽生态系统服务价值估算[J].湿地科学,2014,12(1):81-88.[SONG Wen-bin,ZHANG Yi-ran,ZHANG Ling,et al.Evaluation of Service Valuation of Marsh Ecosysterm in Honghe National Nature Reserve[J].Wetland Science,2014,12(1):81-88.]
[29]	王洪禄,王秋兵.芦苇沼泽湿地开发为稻田前后生态系统服务价值对比研究:以丹东鸭绿江口湿地国家级自然保护区为例[J].中国农学通报,2006,22(2):348-352.[WANG Hong-lu,WANG Qiu-bing.A Comparison Study of Ecosystem Service Value before and after Reed Marsh Empoldered to Paddyfield:Take Yalu River Wetland National Nature Reserve as an Example[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2006,22(2):348-352.]
[30]	刘茜雅,王海兵,左合君,等.基于能值分析的毛乌素沙地库伦生态经济圈结构与效益特征[J].干旱区资源与环境,2022,36(3):44-50.[LIU Xi-ya,WANG Hai-bing,ZUO He-jun,et al.Structure and Benefit Characteristics of the Kulun Ecological Economic Circle Based on the Emergy Analysis[J].Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment,2022,36(3):44-50.]
[31]	周梦遥,游巍斌,林美娇,等.基于LANDIS模型的福建天宝岩森林景观演替动态模拟[J].北京林业大学学报,2018,40(8):12-22.[ZHOU Meng-yao,YOU Wei-bin,LIN Mei-jiao,et al.Dynamic Simulation of Forest Landscape Succession Based on LANDIS Model in Tianbaoyan,Fujian Province of Southern China[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2018,40(8):12-22.]
[32]	孙嘉鸿,郭彤,董彦民,等.冻融循环对金川泥炭沼泽土壤微生物量及群落结构的影响[J].生态学报,2022,42(7):2763-2773.[SUN Jia-hong,GUO Tong,DONG Yan-min,et al.Effect of Freezing and Thawing on Soil Microbial Biomass and Community Structure in Jinchuan Peatlands[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2022,42(7):2763-2773.]
[33]	王京,卓玛姐,阿西,等.若尔盖高原不同退牧还湿方式下泥炭沼泽表层土壤的水源涵养能力研究[J].湿地科学,2022,20(2):188-195.[WANG Jing,ZHUO Ma-jie,A Xi,et al.Water Conservation Capacity of Topsoil in Peat Bogs under Different Ways of Ceasing Herding in Zoigê Plateau[J].Wetland Science,2022,20(2):188-195.]