生态与农村环境学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1): 82-87.doi:

• 污染控制与修复 • 上一篇    下一篇

电镀厂污染土壤重金属形态及淋洗去除效果

甘文君, 何跃, 张孝飞, 单艳红, 郑丽萍, 林玉锁   

  1. 南京农业大学资源与环境科学学院
  • 收稿日期:2011-09-19 修回日期:2011-10-17 出版日期:2012-01-25 发布日期:2012-01-10
  • 通讯作者: 林玉锁 环境保护部南京环境科学研究所 E-mail:lys@nies.org
  • 作者简介:甘文君(1987-),女,江苏常州人,硕士生,主要从事污染场地土壤修复和风险评价方面的研究。E-mail:gwj7200063@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    环保公益性行业科研专项(201109052)

Speciation Analysis of Heavy Metals in Soils Polluted by Electroplating and Effect of Washing to the Removal of the Pollutants

GAN  Wen-Jun, HE  Yue, ZHANG  Xiao-Fei, DAN  Yan-Hong, ZHENG  Li-Ping, LIN  Yu-Suo   

  1. College of Resource and Environmental Science,Nanjing Agricultural University
  • Received:2011-09-19 Revised:2011-10-17 Online:2012-01-25 Published:2012-01-10
  • Contact: LIN Yu-Suo Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences,Ministry of Environmental Protection E-mail:lys@nies.org

摘要: 以某电镀厂污染场地重污染区域土壤为研究对象,对土壤中重金属全量和各形态含量进行分析,并研究筛选高效土壤淋洗剂,比较其淋洗去除效果。结果表明,该污染土壤中以铬和镍污染最为严重,土壤铬和镍含量分别达1563.00和679.00 mg·kg-1,土壤铜、锌和铅含量分别为297.00、276.00和51.40 mg·kg-1,铜、铬、镍、锌和铅的有效态比例分别为41.77%、13.16%、28.08%、21.50%和31.18%。去离子水、盐酸、乙酸、草酸、柠檬酸和EDTA 6种淋洗剂中,去离子水对5种重金属提取量均较少;草酸对铜、铬、镍和锌去除效果较好,去除率分别率分别为55.1%、24.8%、47.5%和29.3%;柠檬酸对铜、铬、镍和锌去除效果较好,去除率分别为26.3%、25.7%、33.0%和21.6%;EDTA对铜、铬、镍和锌去除效果较好,去除率分别为31.5%、28.9%、21.4%和30.6%。综合考虑淋洗剂的提取效果、水溶性以及操作难度和成本,建议采用柠檬酸作为淋洗剂,最佳液土比[ V (液):m(土)]为10:1,最佳淋洗时间为6 h。

关键词: 污染场地, 重金属, 形态, 土壤淋洗, 土壤修复

Abstract: Soil samples were collected from a heavily polluted area of an electroplating plant site for analysis of totals of the heavy metals therein and contents of their various forms separately in the soil.Furthermore,researches and screening were done to develop high-efficiency soil washing agents,of which comparison was made in effect of heavy mental removal rate.Results show that chromium (Cr) and nickel (Ni) were the most abundant heavy metals in the soil,reaching 1564.00 and 679.00 mg·kg-1 respectively in total,and copper (Cu),zinc (Zn),and lead (Pb) was found to be 297.00,276.00 and 51.40 mg·kg-1,respectively,of which 13.16%,28.08%,41.77%,21.50% and 31.18% was in available form,respectively.Among the six washing agents,i.e.deionized water,hydrochloric acid,acetic acid,oxalic acid,citric acid and EDTA,deionized water was was less effective in removing the 5 heavy metals while oxalic acid was more effective in removing Cu,Cr,Ni and Zn,reaching 55.1%,24.8%,47.5% and 29.3% in removing rate,citric acid was better at removing Cu,Cr,Ni and Zn,reaching 26.3%,25.7%,33.0% and 21.6%;and EDTA showed better performance on Cu,Ni,Zn and Pb,with removal rate being 31.5%,28.9%,21.4% and 30.6%,respectively.Taking into account comprehensively extraction effectiveness,water-solubility,easiness in operation and cost of the agents,it is suggested that citric acid be used with the optimal liquid to soil ratio being 10:1 and the optimal duration of washing being 6 hours.

Key words: polluted site, heavy metal, chemical form, soil washing, soil remediation

中图分类号: