生态与农村环境学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 1282-1288.doi: 10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2019.0244

• 自然保护与生态 • 上一篇    下一篇

边疆牧户对草原生态保护补助奖励政策的态度分析

康晓虹1,2   

  1. 1. 内蒙古财经大学金融学院, 内蒙古 呼和浩特 010010;
    2. 内蒙古农村牧区治理能力现代化研究基地, 内蒙古 呼和浩特 010010
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-10 出版日期:2019-10-25 发布日期:2019-10-23
  • 作者简介:康晓虹(1980-),女,天津市人,副教授,博士,主要从事农村牧区经济研究。E-mail:2003kxh@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金(18BMZ135)

An Analysis of the Attitudes of Frontier Pastoral Herdsmen to the Grassland Ecological Protection Subsidy and Incentive Policies

KANG Xiao-hong1,2   

  1. 1. College of Finance, Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics, Hohhot 010010, China;
    2. Inner Mongolia Rural Pastoral Area Management Capacity Modernization Research Base, Hohhot 010010, China
  • Received:2019-04-10 Online:2019-10-25 Published:2019-10-23

摘要: 基于内蒙古边疆牧区9个典型牧业旗县获取的449个牧户调查数据,采用Logistic回归分析方法,考察不同类型样本牧户对草原生态保护补助奖励(以下简称"草原生态补奖")政策的态度及其影响因素。结果表明,对现行草原生态补奖政策持肯定态度并愿意继续参与的牧户占比更大,不同类型牧户补奖态度的影响因素差异明显。由于草原生态补奖政策对禁牧型牧户的放牧行为限制较多,对牧户家庭收入、家庭成员就业以及社会保障带来较大消极影响,该类牧户对现行补奖政策的接受度较低。草畜平衡型牧户对草场的依赖程度与禁牧型牧户相比有所减轻,牧户对于补奖标准的公平性评价越高,牧户拥有的人均草场面积越广,家庭生计多样性指数越大,牧户越愿意继续参与草原生态补奖机制。因此,建议健全牧户补奖参与机制,多措并举提升牧户畜牧业收入和非牧收入,完善补奖配套机制以提升禁牧户福利水平。

关键词: 边疆牧区, 牧户, 草原生态保护补助奖励政策, 补奖态度

Abstract: Based on the survey data obtained from 449 herdsmen of 9 typical animal husbandry counties in the pastoral areas of Inner Mongolia, logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the attitudes of different types of sample herdsmen to the grassland ecological reward policy and its influencing factors. The results of the study show that, majority of the herdsmen are in favor of the current grassland ecological protection subsidy and incentive policies and willing to continue to participate. The influence factors of different types of herdsmen's about subsidy and incentive attitudes are obviously different. Because the grassland ecological protection subsidy and incentive policies have more restrictions on the grazing behavior of the grazing-type pastoralists, it has a greater negative impact on the family income, family members' employment and social security. The pastoralist in this type have a lower acceptance of the current policy. The dependence of grass-animal balanced herdsmen on grassland is reduced compared with the grazing-free herdsmen. The higher the fairness of the herdsmen's criteria for the compensation standards, the wider the per capita grassland area of the herdsmen and the bigger the diversity of the index family livelihoods,the more willingness the herdsmen choose to continue to participate in the grassland ecological protection subsidy and incentive mechanism. Therefore, it is recommended to improve the herdsmen participation mechanism of subsidy and incentive, to find ways to increase the pastoral income and non-grazing income, and to make better the supporting mechanism to enhance the welfare of the grazing-type pastoralists.

Key words: border pastoral area, herdsmen, grassland ecological protection subsidy and incentive policies, attitude to compensation

中图分类号: