农业相关“爱知生物多样性目标”实施进展分析

doi:10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2021.0123

生态与农村环境学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (10): 1249-1255.doi: 10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2021.0123

• 生物多样性保护目标设计与评估技术专题 • 上一篇下一篇

农业相关“爱知生物多样性目标”实施进展分析

范顺祥¹, 胡飞龙², 刘云慧¹

1. 中国农业大学生物多样性与有机农业北京市重点实验室, 北京 100193;
2. 生态环境部南京环境科学研究所/国家环境保护生物安全重点实验室, 江苏南京 210042

收稿日期:2021-03-03 出版日期:2021-10-25 发布日期:2021-10-27
通讯作者: 胡飞龙, 刘云慧 E-mail:hfl@nies.org;liuyh@cau.edu.cn
作者简介:范顺祥(1994-),男,河南三门峡人,研究方向为景观格局与生物多样性。E-mail:fanfan_sx@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划（2018YFC0507204）；国家自然科学基金（41871186）

Analysis of the Progress on the Agriculture-related “Aichi Biodiversity Targets”

FAN Shun-xiang¹, HU Fei-long², LIU Yun-hui¹

1. Beijing Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Organic Farming, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;
2. Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences/National Key Laboratory of Biosafety, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing 210042, China

Received:2021-03-03 Online:2021-10-25 Published:2021-10-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 农业是全球景观和土地利用变化的主要驱动力，其不合理使用造成的生境丧失对生物多样性造成巨大威胁。国际《生物多样性战略计划》"爱知目标（Aichi Biodiversity Targets）"的实施是推动全球生物多样性保护的重要举措，其中目标7提到的农业可持续利用与农业生物多样性保护直接相关，同时目标1、4、5、8、13、14、15、18也促进了目标7的实现，掌握和评估相关"爱知目标"的进展状况，是调整、修改和确定全球农业生物多样性目标的关键。该研究以农业相关"爱知目标"为基础，统计所有提交《生物多样性公约》（Convention on Biological Diversity，CBD）秘书处的缔约方目标进展信息，对比分析各大洲或农业大国的进展情况。结果表明，亚洲、非洲、南美洲的完成情况总体较好，高于全球各目标的完成水平，而北美洲和欧洲完成情况则低于全球平均水平；选择的7个国家中，南非和中国完成情况较好，印度和巴西次之，法国、德国、加拿大靠后，总体表现出和大洲相似的趋势；目标总体有进展，但是仍无法有效实现农业生物多样性的保护。通过分析目标的进展情况和问题，研究提出从有差异地制定目标、增加新的可量化目标、设定新的技术指标、加强交流和合作4个方面入手完善农业生物多样性指标的制定思路，以期为《生物多样性公约》第十五次缔约方大会（Fifteenth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties，COP15）农业相关目标和指标的制定提供科学依据。

关键词: “爱知目标”, 进展评估, 农业生物多样性, 保护, 建议

Abstract: Agriculture is the primary driver of global land-use changes and habitat loss leading to a great threat to biodiversity. The implementation of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity "Aichi Targets" is an important initiative to promote the global conservation of biodiversity, of which the sustainable use of agriculture mentioned in target 7 is related to the conservation of agricultural biodiversity directly, targets 1,4,5,8,13,14,15, and 18 also contribute to the achievement of target 7. Understanding and evaluating the progress of these agriculture-related "Aichi Targets" are essential to adjust, revise, and set up the goals of global agricultural biodiversity. In this study, we collected information on the progress of all parties' targets submitted to the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity and compared progress across continents and the countries possessing high biodiversity levels or the big agricultural country. The results showed that Asia, Africa, and South America have achieved more targets than the global averages, while the targets achieved by North America and Europe are below the global averages. South Africa and China did the best of all seven selected countries, followed by India, Brazil, France, Germany, and Canada, showing a generally same trend with the continents-level analysis. The overall goals have gained some progress already, but the conservation of agricultural biodiversity was hard to effectively achieve. By analyzing the progress and problems of accomplishing the goals, we advised to improve the biodiversity conservation targets from four aspects, such as setting up differentiated goals, adding new quantifiable goals, setting new technical indicators, and strengthening communication and cooperation. This paper puts forward and improves the idea of developing agricultural biodiversity indicators and provides a scientific basis for the development of agriculture-related targets and indicators for the Fifteenth session of the Conference of the Parties (COP15) of the Convention on Biological Diversity.

Key words: Aichi Targets, progress assessment, agricultural biodiversity, conservation, suggest

中图分类号:

X176

范顺祥, 胡飞龙, 刘云慧. 农业相关“爱知生物多样性目标”实施进展分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2021, 37(10): 1249-1255.

FAN Shun-xiang, HU Fei-long, LIU Yun-hui. Analysis of the Progress on the Agriculture-related “Aichi Biodiversity Targets”[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2021, 37(10): 1249-1255.

参考文献

[1] CBD.Revised and Updated Strategic Plan:Technical Rationale and Suggested Milestones and Indicators[Z].Nagoya:CBD, 2010.
[2] Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.Global Biodiversity Outlook 4[EB/OL].(2015-04-15)[2021-02-01].https://www.cbd.int/gbo4/.
[3] Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.Global Biodiversity Outlook 5[EB/OL].(2020-08-18)[2021-02-01].https://www.cbd.int/gbo5/.
[4] BRAZEIRO A, ACHKAR M, TORANZA C, et al.Agricultural Expansion in Uruguayan Grasslands and Priority Areas for Vertebrate and Woody Plant Conservation[J].Ecology and Society, 2020, 25:15.
[5] LI L, HU R C, HUANG J K, et al.A Farmland Biodiversity Strategy is Needed for China[J].Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2020, 4(6):772-774.
[6] MAXWELL S L, FULLER R A, BROOKS T M, et al.Biodiversity:The Ravages of Guns, Nets and Bulldozers[J].Nature, 2016, 536(7615):143-145.
[7] LAIKRE L, HOBAN S, BRUFORD M W, et al.Post-2020 Goals Overlook Genetic Diversity[J].Science, 2020, 367(6482):1083-1085.
[8] SHEPHERD E, MILNER-GULLAND E J, KNIGHT A T, et al.Status and Trends in Global Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital:Assessing Progress Toward Aichi Biodiversity Target 14[J].Conservation Letters, 2016, 9(6):429-437.
[9] TÖRÖK K, HORVÁTH F, KÖVENDI-JAKÓ A, et al.Meeting Aichi Target 15:Efforts and Further Needs of Ecological Restoration in Hungary[J].Biological Conservation, 2019, 235:128-135.
[10] LECLōRE D, OBERSTEINER M, BARRETT M, et al.Bending the Curve of Terrestrial Biodiversity Needs an Integrated Strategy[J].Nature, 2020, 585(7826):551-556.
[11] R Core Team.R:A language and Environment for Statistical Computing[Z].R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2018.
[12] BONGAARTS J.Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services[J].Population and Development Review, 2019, 45(3):680-681.
[13] REGANOLD J P, PAPENDICK R I, PARR J F.Sustainable Agriculture[J].Scientific American, 1990, 262(6):112-120.
[14] WANGER T C, DECLERCK F, GARIBALDI L A, et al.Integrating Agroecological Production in a Robust Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework[J].Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2020, 4(9):1150-1152.
[15] TSCHARNTKE T, CLOUGH Y, WANGER T C, et al.Global Food Security, Biodiversity Conservation and the Future of Agricultural Intensification[J].Biological Conservation, 2012, 151(1):53-59.
[16] GERTEN D, ROCKSTROM J, HEINKE J, et al.Response to Comment on "Planetary Boundaries:Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet"[J].Science, 2015, 348(6240):1217.
[17] BUTCHART S H M, WALPOLE M, COLLEN B, et al.Global Biodiversity:Indicators of Recent Declines[J].Science, 2010, 328(5982):1164-1168.
[18] Food and Agricutlure Organization of the United Nations.Domestic Animal Diversity Information System (DAD-IS), 2020[EB/OL].[2021-02-01].http://www.fao.org/dad-is/en/.
[19] TITTENSOR D P, WALPOLE M, HILL S L, et al.A Mid-Term Analysis of Progress Toward International Biodiversity Targets[J].Science, 2014, 346(6206):241-244.
[20] MAXWELL S L, MILNER-GULLAND E J, JONES J P G, et al.Being Smart about SMART Environmental Targets[J].Science, 2015, 347(6226):1075-1076.
[21] HAGERMAN S M, PELAI R."As far as Possible and as Appropriate":Implementing the Aichi Biodiversity Targets[J].Conservation Letters, 2016, 9(6):469-478.
[22] COLLEN B, NICHOLSON E.Taking the Measure of Change[J].Science, 2014, 346(6206):166-167.
[23] BUTCHART S H M, DI MARCO M, WATSON J E M.Formulating Smart Commitments on Biodiversity:Lessons from the Aichi Targets[J].Conservation Letters, 2016, 9(6):457-468.
[24] HOBAN S, BRUFORD M, D'URBAN J, et al.Genetic Diversity Targets and Indicators in the CBD Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework must be Improved[J].Biological Conservation, 2020, 248:108654.
[25] SKIDMORE A K, PETTORELLI N, COOPS N C, et al.Environmental Science:Agree on Biodiversity Metrics to Track from Space[J].Nature, 2015, 523(7561):403-405.
[26] DÍAZ S, ZAFRA-CALVO N, PURVIS A, et al.Set Ambitious Goals for Biodiversity and Sustainability[J].Science, 2020, 370(6515):411-413.
[27] MA T X, HU Y S, WANG M, et al.Unity of Nature and Man:A New Vision and Conceptual Framework for the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework[J].National Science Review, 2021, 8(7):265.

农业相关“爱知生物多样性目标”实施进展分析

Analysis of the Progress on the Agriculture-related “Aichi Biodiversity Targets”

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘永新, 邵长伟, 张殿昌, 郑先虎, 侯吉伦. 我国水生生物遗传资源保护现状与策略[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2021, 37(9): 1089-1097.
[2]	王蕾, 卢晓强, 刘立, 马月, 胡飞龙, 刘燕. 其他基于区域的有效保护措施(OECMs)的机遇、挑战及对策分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2021, 37(9): 1122-1128.
[3]	张晓平, 胡紫红, 危小建, 黄耀文. 资源枯竭型城市生态保护修复关键区识别研究:以江西省大余县为例[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2021, 37(8): 1031-1040.
[4]	牟雪洁, 饶胜, 张箫, 王夏晖, 朱振肖. 县域生物多样性保护优先格局评价及保护体系优化:以武夷山市为例[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2021, 37(6): 769-777.
[5]	林远锋, 许鹏, 张文文, 崔鹏, 李晓民, 鲁长虎. 我国动物园与自然保护区人工圈养丹顶鹤种群现状[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2021, 37(5): 668-673.
[6]	王凤琴, 陈晨, 刘威, 刘亚洲, 卢学强, 魏巍, 古远, 伊剑锋. 天津冬季水鸟多样性和优先保护区域分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2021, 37(4): 509-517.
[7]	刘刚, 龚明昊, 刘威, 李皓, 张建峰, 岳伟, 魏秀红, 钱英, 谢永刚, 张菊, 焦德玉, 伊剑锋, 周景英. 内蒙古图牧吉国家级自然保护区繁殖期鸟类种群动态[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2021, 37(3): 341-347.
[8]	闫振天, 卢明娟, 李廷景, 傅樵, 付文博, 陈斌. 重庆缙云山国家级自然保护区蝴蝶种类调查和区系分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2021, 37(2): 194-200.
[9]	刘云慧, 王诗皓, 陈宝雄, 范顺祥, 宇振荣. 中国农业生物多样性保护主要政策、措施回顾及2020年后展望[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2021, 37(10): 1225-1233.
[10]	于丹丹, 童文君, 刘威, 伊剑锋, 陈萌萌, 曹铭昌, 徐海根. 基于“自然未来框架”的中国生物多样性保护目标情景研究初探[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2021, 37(10): 1234-1241.
[11]	傅世锋, 吴海燕, 蔡晓琼. 厦门海域底栖生物多样性保护目标确定[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2021, 37(10): 1264-1270.
[12]	张明莎, 刘乾飞, 王敬文, 蔡颖, 柏智刚, 叶江霞. 1992-2018年轿子山自然保护区人为活动遥感监测[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2020, 36(9): 1097-1105.
[13]	台德运, 刘研, 陈婉, 李宏. 江西鄱阳湖国家级自然保护区两栖动物资源现状及保护对策[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2020, 36(8): 982-987.
[14]	刘研, 何玉晓, 诸冠彦, 高朔, 徐海根, 李宏. 湖南南岳衡山两栖动物物种多样性及其时空格局[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2020, 36(8): 975-981.
[15]	朱文博, 赵春霖, 何玉晓, 廖春林, 赵天, 江建平, 徐海根. 湖南八大公山两栖动物多样性时空格局观测[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2020, 36(8): 961-967.