有机种植方式对稻田动物多样性的影响:以句容戴庄为例

doi:10.11934/j.issn.1673-4831.2018.07.006

生态与农村环境学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (7): 614-621.doi: 10.11934/j.issn.1673-4831.2018.07.006

有机种植方式对稻田动物多样性的影响:以句容戴庄为例

王磊¹, 李刚¹, 席运官¹, 陈秋会¹, 李妍¹, 田伟¹, 张弛¹, 李鹏², 杨豪³, 张纪兵¹, 肖兴基¹

1. 环境保护部南京环境科学研究所, 江苏南京 210042;
2. 南京师范大学生命科学学院, 江苏南京 210023;
3. 句容市天王镇农业服务中心, 江苏镇江 212400

收稿日期:2017-09-04 出版日期:2018-07-25 发布日期:2018-07-25
通讯作者: 席运官, 李鹏 E-mail:xygofrcc@126.com;biolipeng@163.com
作者简介:王磊(1984-),男,山东济阳人,副研究员,博士,研究方向为环水有机农业面源污染控制与生态修复。E-mail:wlofrcc@126.com
基金资助:
环保公益性行业科研专项（201309036，201209036）；中央级公益性科研院所基金（GYZX170101）；国家科技支撑计划（2014BAK19B01）；公益性行业（农业）科研专项（201003014-2）

Investigation on Animal Diversity in Different Paddy Fields With Organic Farming: A Case Study in Daizhuang of Jurong County, Jiangsu Province, China

WANG Lei¹, LI Gang¹, XI Yun-guan¹, CHEN Qiu-hui¹, LI Yan¹, TIAN Wei¹, ZHANG Chi¹, LI Peng², YANG Hao³, ZHANG Ji-bing¹, XIAO Xing-ji¹

1. Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection, Nanjing 210042, China;
2. College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China;
3. Agricultural Service Center of Tianwang Town, Zhenjiang 212400, China

Received:2017-09-04 Online:2018-07-25 Published:2018-07-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在句容市戴庄村分3 a（2013、2015和2017年）采样，对比有机种植方式（分别连续实施7、9和11 a）和常规种植对稻田动物群落组成和多样性的影响。调查结果表明，有机稻田中动物物种和数量均显著高于常规稻田（P< 0.05），其中，发现的有机稻田动物分别隶属于腹足纲、寡毛纲、蛭纲、昆虫纲、软甲纲、鳃足纲、蛛形纲、两栖纲、鱼纲和哺乳纲共10纲28目130种，常规稻田动物隶属于8纲13目27种。节肢动物为动物群落的优势物种，有机稻田动物中节肢动物有4纲15目106种，占发现动物总种数的81.5%，其他动物6纲13目24种，占18.5%；常规稻田节肢动物只有3纲9目22种，占常规稻田发现动物总种数的81.5%，其他动物5纲4目5种，占18.5%。有机稻田鱼类、两栖动物和节肢动物群落Margalef丰富度指数和Pielou均匀度指数均显著高于常规稻田（P< 0.01），有机稻田环节动物、两栖动物和鱼类群落Simpson多样性指数均显著高于常规稻田（P<0.01）。有机种植方式不仅能够提高物种多样性，而且能够提高物种均匀度水平，有机水稻栽培下的稻田水生生态系统具有更高的稳定性和更好的环境质量水平。

关键词: 稻田, 有机农业, 常规农业, 群落, 动物多样性

Abstract:

Information on the animal biodiversity in organic paddy fields is poorly understood and surprisingly obscure in China. A comparative filed study on the diversity and composition of animal community in 7-year, 9-year and 11-year organic and conventional rice fields was conducted. Animals observed via multiple field surveys belonged to Gastropoda, Oligocllaeta, Hirudinea, Insecta, Malacostraca, Branchiopoda, Arachnoidea, Amphibia, Pisces, and Mammalia (including 10 classes, 28 orders, 130 species) in organic paddy field. However, the animals observed in conventional paddy field belonged to only 8 classes, 13 orders, 27 species. Arthropods were the dominant species in all observed animal community. All observed arthropods belong to 4 classes, 15 orders, and 106 species (81.5% of total observed animal species) while other animals contained 6 classes, 13 orders, 24 species were identified in the organic paddy fields (18.5% of total observed animal species). Nevertheless, only 3 classes, 9 orders, 22 species (81.5% of total observed animal species) for arthropods whereas 5 classes, 4 orders, 5 species (18.5% of total observed animal species) for other animals were identified in the conventional paddy fields. The Margalef diversity and Pielou's evenness index of fishes, amphibians and arthropods were significantly (P< 0.01) higher in organic farms than that in conventional ones. Simpson diversity index of annelids, fishes and amphibians were significantly (P< 0.01) higher in the organic paddy fields than that in the conventional paddy fields. The results indicate that the aquatic ecosystem of organic paddy cultivation has higher ecological stability and environmental quality.

Key words: paddy field, organic agriculture, conventional agriculture, community, animal biodiversity

中图分类号:

S345
S154.5

王磊, 李刚, 席运官, 陈秋会, 李妍, 田伟, 张弛, 李鹏, 杨豪, 张纪兵, 肖兴基. 有机种植方式对稻田动物多样性的影响:以句容戴庄为例[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(7): 614-621.

WANG Lei, LI Gang, XI Yun-guan, CHEN Qiu-hui, LI Yan, TIAN Wei, ZHANG Chi, LI Peng, YANG Hao, ZHANG Ji-bing, XIAO Xing-ji. Investigation on Animal Diversity in Different Paddy Fields With Organic Farming: A Case Study in Daizhuang of Jurong County, Jiangsu Province, China[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2018, 34(7): 614-621.

参考文献

[1] POTTS S G,BIESMEIJER J C,KREMEN C,et al.Global Pollinator Declines:Trends,Impacts and Drivers[J].Trends in Ecology & Evolution,2010,25(6):345-353.
[2] TSCHARNTKE T,TYLIANAKIS J M,RAND T A,et al.Landscape Moderation of Biodiversity Patterns and Processes-Eight Hypotheses[J].Biological Reviews,2012,87(3):661-685.
[3] TSIAFOULI M A,THÉBAULT E,SGARDELIS S P,et al.Intensive Agriculture Reduces Soil Biodiversity Across Europe[J].Global Change Biology,2015,21(2):973-985.
[4] LIU Y,DUAN M,YU Z.Agricultural Landscapes and Biodiversity in China[J].Agriculture,Ecosystems & Environment,2013,166:46-54.
[5] 王磊,杨静,席运官,等.有机耕作方式对我国南方典型土壤质量影响的评价[J].生态与农村环境学报,2017,33(6):564-570.[WANG Lei,YANG Jing,XI Yun-guan,et al.Assessment of Quality of Soils Under Organic Farming in South China[J] Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment,2017,33(6):564-570.]
[6] 王磊,席运官,肖兴基,等.发展环水有机农业控制农业面源污染的政策与建议[J].农业环境科学学报,2017,36(8):1590-1594.[WANG Lei,XI Yun-guan,XIAO Xing-ji,et al.Development of Organic Agriculture in Watershed Areas to Control Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution[J].Journal of Agro-Environment Science,2017,36(8):1590-1594.]
[7] WANG Hong-yan,NIE Ying,BUTTERLY C R,et al.Fertilization Alters Microbial Community Composition and Functional Patterns by Changing the Chemical Nature of Soil Organic Carbon:A Field Study in a Halosol[J].Geoderma,2017,292:17-24.
[8] WANG Lei,BUTTERLY C R,TIAN Wei,et al.Effects of Fertilization Practices on Aluminum Fractions and Species in a Wheat Soil[J].Journal of Soils and Sediments,2016,16(7):1933-1943.
[9] CROWDER D W,NORTHFIELD T D,STRAND M R,et al.Organic Agriculture Promotes Evenness and Natural Pest Control[J].Nature,2010,466:109-112.
[10] MARJA R,HERZON I,VⅡK E,et al.Environmentally Friendly Management as an Intermediate Strategy Between Organic and Conventional Agriculture to Support Biodiversity[J].Biological Conservation,2014,178:146-154.
[11] 沈君辉,刘光杰,袁明.我国稻田节肢动物群落研究新进展[J].中国农学通报,2002,18(4):90-93.[SHEN J H,LIU G J,YUAN M.New Advances on Studies of Arthropod Community in Paddy Field[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2002,18(4):90-93.]
[12] 袁伟,刘洪,张士新,等.长江农场有机稻田害虫与天敌群落评价[J].上海农业学报,2010,26(2):132-136.[YUAN Wei,LIU Hong,ZHANG Shi-xin,et al.Evaluation of Communities of Insect Pests and Natural Enemies in Organic Rice Fields of Changjiang Farm[J].Acta Agriculturae Shanghai,2010,26(2):132-136.]
[13] 王长永,王光,万树文,等.有机农业与常规农业对农田生物多样性影响的比较研究进展[J].生态与农村环境学报,2007,23(1):75-80.[WANG Chang-yong,WANG Guang,WAN Shu-wen,et al.Effects of Organic and Conventional Farming Systems on Farm Land Biodiversity[J].Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment,2007,23(1):75-80.]
[14] 武剑,周小丹,薛文达,等.有机稻田与常规稻田浮游动物群落比较[J].江西农业学报,2012,24(10):95-97.[WU Jian,ZHOU Xiao-dan,XUE Wen-da,et al.Comparison of Zooplankton Community Between Organic Rice Fields and Conventional Rice Fields[J].Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi,2012,24(10):95-97.]
[15] 杨国庆,吴进才,张士新,等.三种类型稻田节肢动物群落结构、亚群落内禀增长率与链节数的关系[J].生态学报,2004,24(4):686-692.[YANG Guo-qing,WU Jin-cai,ZHANG Shi-xin,et al.The Relationship Among Structures,Intrinsic Rate of Increase of Functional Guilds,and Link Numbers of Arthropod Community in Three Types of Rice Field Under Organic Rice Product Ion System[J].Acta Ecological Sinica,2004,24(4):686-692.]
[16] TUCK S L,WINQVIST C,MOTA F,et al.Land-Use Intensity and the Effects of Organic Farming on Biodiversity:A Hierarchical Meta-Analysis[J].Journal of Applied Ecology,2014,51(3):746-755.
[17] BENGTSSON J,AHNSTRÖM J,WEIBULL A N N C.The Effects of Organic Agriculture on Biodiversity and Abundance:A Meta-Analysis[J].Journal of Applied Ecology,2005,42(2):261-269.
[18] FULLER R J,NORTON L R,FEBER R E,et al.Benefits of Organic Farming to Biodiversity Vary Among Taxa[J].Biology Letters,2005,1(4):431-434.
[19] BENAYAS J M R,NEWTON A C,DIAZ A,et al.Enhancement of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services by Ecological Restoration:A Meta-Analysis[J].Science,2009,325(5944):1121-1124.
[20] 万年峰,季香云,蒋杰贤,等.田埂留草控制稻飞虱效果及对捕食性天敌多样性影响[J].应用昆虫学报,2012,49(6):1604-1609.[WAN Nian-feng,JI Xiang-yun,JIANG Jie-xian,et al.Effect of Retaining Grass on Rice Field Ridges on Rice Plant Hoppers and the Diversity of Natural Enemies of Rice Pests in Rice Fields[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology,2012,49(6):1604-1609.]
[21] 陈洪凡,陈琼,黄水金,等.稻田节肢动物群落多样性指数与植食类、捕食类亚群落发生量的相关性分析[J].植物保护学报,2014(4):490-494.[CHEN Hong-fan,CHEN Qiong,HUANG Shui-jin,et al.Correlation Between Arthropod Community Diversity Index and Abundance of Phytophagous and Predacious Sub-Communities in Rice Paddies[J].Acta Phytophylacica Sinica,2014(4):490-494.]

有机种植方式对稻田动物多样性的影响:以句容戴庄为例

Investigation on Animal Diversity in Different Paddy Fields With Organic Farming: A Case Study in Daizhuang of Jurong County, Jiangsu Province, China

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	顾诗云, 杨飞, 张毅敏, 张志伟, 谢科夫, 管祥洋. 淹水胁迫对菖蒲生理特性及其根际细菌群落特征的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2020, 36(4): 488-498.
[2]	李雪, 刘述凤, 鄢雨朦, 张润洁, 王天杰, 付保荣. 复合芽孢杆菌对鲫鱼养殖水体水质及细菌群落结构的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2020, 36(4): 522-530.
[3]	寄博华, 李玮, 常军军, 李璇, 司光正, 何芳, 陈金全. 滇池湖滨湿地不同挺水植物区沉积物细菌群落结构特征[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2020, 36(3): 390-398.
[4]	罗鼎晖, 李翔, 骆蓓菁, 许洺山, 妥彬, 阎恩荣, 由文辉. 大金山岛常绿阔叶林和落叶阔叶林中小型土壤动物群落特征[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2020, 36(3): 349-357.
[5]	李凯益, 沈根祥, 王振旗, 赵晓祥, 钱晓雍, 付侃, 徐昶, 何忠虎. 基于猪粪资源利用的稻田径流污染物排放特征[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2020, 36(1): 129-135.
[6]	于小彦, 杨艳芳, 张平究, 张群, 杜永固. 不同水分条件下生物质炭添加对湿地土壤微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(9): 1163-1171.
[7]	覃宝利, 唐金玉, 王宣朋, 吴春, 叶建勇, 丁辰龙. 骆马湖夏季浮游植物群落结构变化及其驱动因子分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(9): 1172-1181.
[8]	张航, 栾小兵, 刘奇志. 土壤线虫群落对梨园不同害虫防治策略的响应[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(8): 1043-1050.
[9]	郭兴然, 刘宪斌, 张青田, 赵兴贵. 河北昌黎海域大型底栖动物群落特征及青岛文昌鱼资源现状[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(8): 1034-1042.
[10]	马宏燏, 王宏伟, 张庆费, 易逸瑜. 上海崇明岛人工林群落对加拿大一枝黄花入侵的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(6): 756-763.
[11]	邬刚, 袁嫚嫚, 曹哲伟, 张兆冬, 王莉莉, 王永露, 孙义祥. 不同水氮管理条件下稻田氨挥发损失特征[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(5): 651-658.
[12]	李雷雷, 鲍敏, 张营, 马本双, 旦智措, 陈振宁. 青海省祁连县不同生境蝶类群落特征与月度变化规律[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(4): 484-490.
[13]	王春雪, 李敏, 陈建军, 舒正文, 李元, 祖艳群, 王昭. 不同牛粪化肥配施比例下水稻田-沟-塘系统的水质及植物特征[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(4): 506-514.
[14]	姚凯, 敖家林, 徐僡. 花江峡谷岩生草本植物群落及其氮磷计量特征[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(2): 197-204.
[15]	张震, 曹亚蒙, 武建勇, 马友华, 何金铃, 周迪. 不同耕作方式对冬小麦田杂草群落多样性的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(2): 210-216.