白芨滩地区不同生物土壤结皮类型对微生物群落结构和组成的影响

doi:10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2022.0111

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 白芨滩国家级自然保护区及其周边植被恢复有利于改善区域生态环境,而植被恢复良好的区域内镶嵌分布着大面积藓结皮和藻结皮,其在防风固沙、改善荒漠生态系统地表土壤质量等方面发挥着重要作用。为深入了解该区域不同生物土壤结皮中微生物群落结构及其差异,选取藓结皮和藻结皮镶嵌分布的地表覆盖区设置取样点,分别对藓结皮和藻结皮进行细菌和真菌的Illumina MiSeq测序。结果表明,不同生物土壤结皮中细菌群落和真菌群落α多样性趋于一致,仅反映细菌群落丰富度的ACE和Chao指数在藓结皮中显著高于藻结皮。不同生物土壤结皮形成以微枝形杆菌属、红色杆菌属、地嗜皮菌属、芽球菌属、鞘氨醇单胞菌属、土壤红杆菌属、微红微球菌属、类诺卡氏菌属和苔藓杆菌属等为主要类群的细菌群落结构以及以赤霉菌属、Knufia、被孢霉属、石果衣属、链格孢属、Bahusakala、Phaeomycocentrospora、光黑壳属和Omphalina等属为主要已知类群的真菌群落结构。藓结皮中,红色杆菌属细菌相对丰度显著低于藻结皮,而苔藓杆菌属细菌相对丰度显著高于藻结皮。藓结皮中,Knufia、Bahusakala、Omphalina、Lamprospora、Vishniacozyma、Phoma、Entoloma和Trichoderma等属真菌相对丰度显著高于藻结皮;而藓结皮中,Powellomyces、Sporormiella、Thielavia、Iodophanus、Agaricus和Acrophialophora等属真菌相对丰度显著低于藻结皮。生物土壤结皮类型对细菌和真菌群落结构均产生显著影响,分别能够解释不同生物土壤结皮细菌和真菌群落结构差异的14％和8％。这些结果可为深入认识该区域不同生物土壤结皮在荒漠生态系统恢复过程中所具备的生态功能提供微生物多样性数据支撑。

关键词: 生物土壤结皮, 细菌, 真菌, 群落结构, Illumina MiSeq测序

Abstract: Vegetation restoration on the Baijitan National Nature Reserve and in the surrounding areas promotes improvements in the regional ecological environment. A large area of mossy and algal biocrust with a mosaic structure is distributed within the vegetation restoration zone, and this plays an important role in blocking wind, fixing sand and improving the surface soil quality of this desert ecosystem. To fully understand the microbial community structure and differences in different biological soil crusts, sampling sites with a mosaic distribution of mossy and algal biocrust were selected, and the bacteria and fungi within the biocrust were sequenced using Illumina MiSeq technology. The results show that the α diversity of the bacterial and fungal communities in different biological soil crusts tended to be consistent. The Ace and Chao indices, which only reflected the richness of the bacterial community, were significantly higher in the moss biocrust than in the algal biocrust. The bacterial community was mainly composed of Microvirga, Rubrobacter, Geodermatophilus, Blastococcus, Sphingomonas, Solirubrobacter, Rubellimicrobium, Nocardioides and Bryobacter genera, while the fungal community mainly included Gibberella, Knufia, Mortierella, Endocarpon, Alternaria, Bahusakala, Phaeomycocentrospora, Preussia and Omphalina genera. The relative abundance of Rubrobacter in the mossy biocrust was significantly lower than in the algal biocrust, while the relative abundance of Bryobacter was significantly higher in the mossy biocrust than in the algal biocrust. The relative abundance of Knufia, Bahusakala, Omphalina, Lamprospora, Vishniacozyma, Phoma, Entoloma and Trichoderma genera in the mossy biocrust was significantly higher than in the algal biocrust, while the relative abundance of Powellomyces, Sporormiella, Thielavia, Iodophanus, Agaricus and Acrophialophora genera in the mossy biocrust was significantly lower than in the algal biocrust. Biological soil crust types have a significant impact on the bacterial and fungal community structure, and can explain 14％ of the differences in the bacterial community structure and 8％ of the differences in the fungal community structure. These results can provide microbial diversity data for an in-depth understanding of the ecological functions of different biological soil crusts in the process of desert ecosystem restoration.

Key words: biological soil crust, bacteria, fungi, community structure, Illumina MiSeq sequencing

中图分类号:

X172

李靖宇, 杨瑞, 段晓敏, 刘建利, 刘秉儒. 白芨滩地区不同生物土壤结皮类型对微生物群落结构和组成的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2023, 39(1): 97-106.

LI Jing-yu, YANG Rui, DUAN Xiao-min, LIU Jian-li, LIU Bing-ru. Effects of Different Biological Soil Crust Types on Microbial Community Structure and Composition in Baijitan, China[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2023, 39(1): 97-106.

参考文献

[1] 宋超,余琦殷,王瑞霞,等.基于植被覆盖度的宁夏灵武白芨滩自然保护区防风固沙功能时空变化研究[J].生态学报,2021,41(8):3131-3143.[SONG Chao,YU Qi-yin,WANG Rui-xia,et al.Spatio-temporal Variation of Windbreak and Sand Fixation Functions Based on Vegetation Coverage in Baijitan National Nature Reserve,Ningxia[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2021,41(8):3131-3143.]
[2] 刘昀东,高广磊,丁国栋,等.风蚀荒漠化地区土壤质量演变研究进展[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2017,41(5):161-168.[LIU Yun-dong,GAO Guang-lei,DING Guo-dong,et al.Soil Quality in Wind Erosion Desertified Regions:A Review[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition),2017,41(5):161-168.]
[3] 张丙昌,武志芳,李彬.黄土高原生物土壤结皮研究进展与展望[J].土壤学报,2021,58(5):1123-1131.[ZHANG Bing-chang,WU Zhi-fang,LI Bin.Progress and Prospect of Biological Soil Crusts in Loess Plateau[J].Acta Pedologica Sinica,2021,58(5):1123-1131.]
[4] 熊文君,徐琳,张丙昌,等.生物土壤结皮结构、功能及人工恢复技术[J].干旱区资源与环境,2021,35(2):190-195.[XIONG Wen-jun,XU Lin,ZHANG Bing-chang,et al.The Structure,Function and Artificial Restoration Technology of Biological Soil Crust[J].Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment,2021,35(2):190-195.]
[5] 麻云霞,王月林,李钢铁,等.生物地毯治沙工程:生物结皮现状的研究进展[J].草地学报,2019,27(3):531-538.[MA Yun-xia,WANG Yue-lin,LI Gang-tie,et al.Research Progress on the Status of Biological Crust:A Kind of Biological Carpet Sand Control Engineering[J].Acta Agrestia Sinica,2019,27(3):531-538.]
[6] 郭忠录,蔡崇法.生物土壤结皮研究进展与热点:基于CiteSpace和HistCite计量分析[J].中国水土保持科学,2019,17(5):146-156.[GUO Zhong-lu,CAI Chong-fa.Research Status and Hotspots of Biological Soil Crust Based on CiteSpace and HistCite[J].Science of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,17(5):146-156.]
[7] 杨云礼,徐明,邹晓,等.不同植被类型对黔中山地丘陵区土壤细菌群落特征的影响研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2021,37(4):518-525.[YANG Yun-li,XU Ming,ZOU Xiao,et al.Effects of Different Vegetation Types on the Characteristics of Soil Bacterial Communities in the Hilly Area of Central Guizhou[J].Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment,2021,37(4):518-525.]
[8] BAO T L,ZHAO Y G,GAO L Q,et al.Moss-dominated Biocrusts Improve the Structural Diversity of Underlying Soil Microbial Communities by Increasing Soil Stability and Fertility in the Loess Plateau Region of China[J].European Journal of Soil Biology,2019,95:103120.
[9] FUHRMAN J A.Microbial Community Structure and Its Functional Implications[J].Nature,2009,459(7244):193-199.
[10] ZHOU H,GAO Y,JIA X H,et al.Network Analysis Reveals the Strengthening of Microbial Interaction in Biological Soil Crust Development in the Mu Us Sandy Land,Northwestern China[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2020,144:107782.
[11] ZHAO L N,LIU Y B,WANG Z R,et al.Bacteria and Fungi Differentially Contribute to Carbon and Nitrogen Cycles during Biological Soil Crust Succession in Arid Ecosystems[J].Plant and Soil,2020,447(1/2):379-392.
[12] CHEN Y J,NEILSON J W,KUSHWAHA P,et al.Life-history Strategies of Soil Microbial Communities in an Arid Ecosystem[J].The ISME Journal,2021,15(3):649-657.
[13] WANG Z R,LIU Y B,ZHAO L N.Development of Fungal Community Is a Potential Indicator for Evaluating the Stability of Biological Soil Crusts in Temperate Desert Revegetation[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2020,147:103404.
[14] XU L,ZHU B J,LI C N,et al.Development of Biological Soil Crust Prompts Convergent Succession of Prokaryotic Communities[J].CATENA,2020,187:104360.
[15] 冯秀绒,卜崇峰,郝红科,等.基于光谱分析的生物结皮提取研究:以毛乌素沙地为例[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(6):1024-1034.[FENG Xiu-rong,BU Chong-feng,HAO Hong-ke,et al.Research on Biological Soil Crust Extraction by Spectral Analysis in Mu Us Desert,China[J].Journal of Natural Resources,2015,30(6):1024-1034.]
[16] SOLIVERES S,ELDRIDGE D J.Dual Community Assembly Processes in Dryland Biocrust Communities[J].Functional Ecology,2020,34(4):877-887.
[17] 祁鹤兴,周星辰,胡美娟,等.宁夏白芨滩自然保护区苦豆子内生放线菌多样性及其分布[J].微生物学通报,2015,42(6):990-1000.[QI He-xing,ZHOU Xing-chen,HU Mei-juan,et al.Diversity and Distribution of Endophytic Actinomycetes Strains in Sophora alopecuroides L. from Baijitan Nature Reserve of Ningxia[J].Microbiology China,2015,42(6):990-1000.]
[18] 李靖宇,张肖冲,田兴国,等.压砂地硒砂瓜自根苗/嫁接苗不同连作方式土壤微生物群落结构比较[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(11):3608-3619.[LI Jing-yu,ZHANG Xiao-chong,TIAN Xing-guo,et al.Comparison of Soil Microbial Community Structure under Different Continuous Cropping Patterns of Self-rooted and Grafted Seedlings of Selenium-rich Sand Melon in Artificial Sandcovered Soil[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,2021,40(11):3608-3619.]
[19] CHEN S F,ZHOU Y Q,CHEN Y R,et al.Fastp:An Ultra-fast All-in-one FASTQ Preprocessor[J].Bioinformatics,2018,34(17):i884-i890.
[20] MAGOČ T,SALZBERG S L.FLASH:Fast Length Adjustment of Short Reads to Improve Genome Assemblies[J].Bioinformatics,2011,27(21):2957-2963.
[21] CALLAHAN B J,MCMURDIE P J,ROSEN M J,et al.DADA2:High-resolution Sample Inference from Illumina Amplicon Data[J].Nature Methods,2016,13(7):581-583.
[22] 李新荣,谭会娟,回嵘,等.中国荒漠与沙地生物土壤结皮研究[J].科学通报,2018,63(23):2320-2334.[LI Xin-rong,TAN Hui-juan,HUI Rong,et al.Researches in Biological Soil Crust of China:A Review[J].Chinese Science Bulletin,2018,63(23):2320-2334.]
[23] LI J Y,JIN X Y,ZHANG X C,et al.Comparative Metagenomics of Two Distinct Biological Soil Crusts in the Tengger Desert,China[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2020,140:107637.
[24] ABED R M M,AL-SADI A M,AL-SHEHI M,et al.Diversity of Free-living and Lichenized Fungal Communities in Biological Soil Crusts of the Sultanate of Oman and Their Role in Improving Soil Properties[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2013,57:695-705.
[25] ARENAS F,NAVARRO-RODENAS A,MARQUES-GALVEZ J E,et al.Different Patterns in Root and Soil Fungal Diversity Drive Plant Productivity of the Desert Truffle Terfezia claveryi in Plantation[J].Environmental Microbiology,2021,23(10):5917-5933.
[26] VOIGT O,KNABE N,NITSCHE S,et al.An Advanced Genetic Toolkit for Exploring the Biology of the Rock-inhabiting Black Fungus Knufia petricola[J].Scientific Reports,2020,10:22021.
[27] SEIFFERT F,BANDOW N,BOUCHEZ J,et al.Microbial Colonization of Bare Rocks:Laboratory Biofilm Enhances Mineral Weathering[J].Procedia Earth and Planetary Science,2014,10:123-129.
[28] BELNAP J,LANGE O L.Biological Soil Crusts:Structure,Function,and Management[M].2nd ed.Berlin:Springer,2003:155-166.
[29] 李靖宇,张肖冲,陈韵,等.腾格里沙漠东南缘藻结皮与藓结皮放线菌多样性及其潜在代谢功能[J].生态学报,2020,40(5):1590-1601.[LI Jing-yu,ZHANG Xiao-chong,CHEN Yun,et al.Potential Functions of Actinobacteria Diversity in Cyanobacteria and Moss Crusts in the Southeastern Tengger Desert[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2020,40(5):1590-1601.]
[30] LIU Z T,XIAN W D,LI M M,et al.Microvirga arsenatis sp. Nov.,an Arsenate Reduction Bacterium Isolated from Tibet Hot Spring Sediments[J].Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek,2020,113(8):1147-1153.
[31] BAILEY A C,KELLOM M,PORET-PETERSON A T,et al.Draft Genome Sequence of Microvirga sp. Strain BSC39,Isolated from Biological Soil Crust of Moab,Utah[J].Genome Announcements,2014,2(6):e01197-e01114.
[32] 李靖宇,张琇,孙敏,等.腾格里沙漠沙坡头地区土壤微生物多样性分析[J].生态与农村环境学报,2016,32(5):780-787.[LI Jing-yu,ZHANG Xiu,SUN Min,et al.Analysis of Soil Microbial Diversity in Shapotou Area of Tengger Desert[J].Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment,2016,32(5):780-787.]
[33] WANG J,BAO J T,SU J Q,et al.Impact of Inorganic Nitrogen Additions on Microbes in Biological Soil Crusts[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2015,88:303-313.
[34] ZHANG X C,LI J Y,LIU J L,et al.Temporal Shifts in Cyanobacterial Diversity and Their Relationships to Different Types of Biological Soil Crust in the Southeastern Tengger Desert[J].Rhizosphere,2021,17:100322.
[35] DEDYSH S N,KULICHEVSKAYA I S,HUBER K J,et al.Defining the Taxonomic Status of Described Subdivision 3 Acidobacteria:Proposal of Bryobacteraceae Fam.Nov.[J].International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology,2017,67(2):498-501.
[36] 李靖宇,张琇.腾格里沙漠不同生物土壤结皮微生物多样性分析[J].生态科学,2017,36(3):36-42.[LI Jing-yu,ZHANG Xiu.Microbial Diversity Analysis of Different Biological Soil Crusts in Tengger Desert[J].Ecological Science,2017,36(3):36-42.]